all 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 55 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

Use this as your "fascism has actually taken over" moment if you need one still. Its past time to get serious about our Democracy.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Anyone still clinging to the idea that fascism/authoritarianism is "on it's way" rather that "it's here right fucking now" is simply willfully ignorant, so much an asshole as to be entirely irredeemable, lying, not paying attention, or just fucking too stupid.

    In other words, the straight, white, right-kind-of-Christian, fascist base.

    🤷‍♂️ 🙄 🤡 🖕 💩

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    I wish more people agreed.

    I have a pretty small social circle, but they are all very progressive, very against what is going on right now. Still, I am the only one planning to go to a No Kings protest. I'm the only one who went to the Hands Off protest. It's not encouraging.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    They dont get paid enough to sacrifice their humanity.

  • source
  • [+] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    They're going to start shooting very soon. And Americans don't have the stomach for the years of passive resistance that will be required.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    And Americans don’t have the stomach for the years of passive resistance that will be required.

    You're imagining organized people coordinating to work towards long term goals nationwide...

    That's not what would happen. People would just progressively lose it and start crashing out. People can still rationalize that compliance might work out best for them for now.

    But if they start killing people for resisting despite not knowing who they're even detaining...

    That makes it hard to deny that compliance is pointless. And after that it doesn't take much for entire communities to make the jump to proactive defense.

    trump's not raiding cartel safehouses, he's going after harmless workers. So that shows everyone that using violence to resist makes them prioritize others. But some of those harmless workers have kids who were born here and are legal citizens. But they're Americans, and Americans are rarely harmless

    Hell, look at how gangs took over the projects in Chicago, they'd straight up have snipers 24/7 and if any cops showed up, it didn't take much for the cops to leave. Like, when push comes to shove, trump can't just bomb downtown LA, and occupying America is practically impossible, even for the American military.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    trump can't just bomb downtown LA

    I wish I could believe this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I mean. Even typing it I was remembering Philly PD doing it...

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1985_MOVE_bombing

    But that was 40 years ago and was easily swept under the rug.

    While he could order it to happen, and it's technically possible every obeys that order...

    Actually pulling it off would virtually guarantee every major city being 100x worse than LA has ever been, even 92 LA. Hell, that only took a decade to beat in Cincinnati. It would be trillions of dollars in infrastructure damage alone, not even getting into lost revenue.

    Any attempt to use feds everywhere would spread them too thin and make them ineffective everywhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Remember, trump said blue states would "disappear off the map" before his midterm 'surprise'

    I was reticent about the idea before, but had mentioned it as a terrifying possibility. But, at this point, I would have to consider it likely that he would do much worse than a silly little bomb.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Americans don’t have the stomach for the years of passive resistance

    Oh, buddy...

    We're way past passive...

    If there is to be any saving of the remnants of US democracy, much more that "passive" is required.

    Passive/complacent is exactly how we got where we are.

    🤦‍♀️ 🙄 🤡 🖕 💩

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    And then he corrected himself.

  • source
  • [+] -4 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • 58 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 122 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Unconstitutional. They are now categorically a occupying enemy force.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Where are all the 2A folks who brag nonstop about resisting tyranny?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    in thier red states, which trump is avoiding sending ice and troops , by the way where most of the "illegal/undocumented immigrants are", meat packing plants, farm picking crops.,,,etc/.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Most gun owners are MAGA these days. When they talked about resisting tyranny they basically meant they were racist and didn’t like Obama. They are all for what is happening now.

    People like me who are liberal gun owners are rare and there mostly aren’t enough of us to protest together effectively.

    This is thanks to the rest of you being anti-gun. Hopefully, though it’s too late at this point, you see how fucking retarded it is to be anti-gun in a world where your adversaries are fascists.

    In my state I now have to apply for a permit just to buy a firearm, take a class, and I’m not sure what else. This, even though I already own firearms including a so-called assault rifle, all while possessing a license to carry a concealed pistol.

    That’s the kind of shit people like you voted for, advocated for, and killed off liberal interest in n firearms by doing.

    This reality is what you helped create while our politicians lapped it up - easier to blame guns than help people with their mental health issues. Cheaper too!

    So go fuck yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So you are aggressive, pro gun and anti education.

    Why do you need to protest with someone who is pro gun? Do you think you'll need to use it at a protest?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    The question they replied to was where the pro 2A people were. The point of 2A is that the armed populace meets or exceeds the armed tyrants. One person with a gun can't stop hundreds of cops with battle gear, that's the point of everyone having a right to be armed.

    I would hazard a guess that in this context their answer is probably yes, they expect to need to protest with other pro gun (armed) protesters if they were going to be armed.

    Ask the Black Panthers how well only one or two people being armed in a protest worked against the cops, compared to everyone being armed. There is a reason Reagan started gun control, and it wasn't because his supporters were the ones that were armed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 53 points 1 year ago

    "Several days of training"

    That seems sufficient /s

  • source
  • [–] 53 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [+] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 95 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I wish they tied up BSG with an ending that demonstrated the cylon plan.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Yeah, I love BSG, but about half the time I rewatched it I end up just forgetting to continue about when they start working with the cylons. I think they didn't actually know what the plan was when writing the show, and then it just sort of stops.

    In my opinion, the show in general just has a very slow steady decline. It starts as some of the best TV I've ever seen, and then they obviously can't just keep doing the same thing and it starts losing it's place I feel.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    There was that TV movie called "The Plan", which was basically about the show from the cylons' perspective, and trying to work their actions into a somewhat coherent narrative. But the titular "plan" was essentially just winging it.

    The line from the show's intro though, "and they have a plan", that was not something the showrunners originally wanted. The network made them add it in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Photos of Guard soldiers providing security for the agents have already been circulated by immigration officials.

    Bullshit "providing security". They're the ones who are armed and in armor. They have qualified immunity to do basically whatever they want. The national guard should be there to provide security for the citizenry.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 66 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    This violates the Posse Comitatus Act

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Who is downvoting this? Why? Do they disagree that the act was broken? Do they just dislike armed forces being barred from law enforcement?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Votes don't matter here, it's not tracked. Some instances don't even display votes either way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    They matter to just about everyone not on hexbear (for them it really matters but they tell us it does not).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Maybe just you? I've seen a few people get mad about it but most people seem wholly unconcerned with them, and rightfully so.

    Can you tell me what my total "points" are?

    I'm not even sure downvotes affect a comments visibility on here, with the way federation works I bet they don't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Ha, you downvoted me. Ironic.

    Oh and yes the votes do effect visabilty on Lemmy. Some ways of interfacing with lemmy also allow you to see user totals. But that is not the value of votes, the value is in the feedback and interaction on comments.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Cool , so what's your total internet points?

    You can spin up an instance and query the db to find out if you want, I'll wait.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    This opinion has always been stupid. It has never been about "points," it has been about reputation, the points were only ever meant as a shorthand representation of the reputation. So yes, Lemmy won't give me your point total, but I can still see both your comments themselves and their "scores" that I might be able to gauge whether or not you have a reputation as somebody with meaningful contributions or as a contrarian edgelord.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    So you can't actually judge a comment on its own but need Randoms (and bots) to tell you how you should interpret it.

    Definitely not the flex you think it is, and karma doesn't exist here lol. "Reputation" doesn't exist in a way that follows the account. Votes are exceptionally easy to manipulate. Keep assigning value to internet points and I'll just keep pointing and laughing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What an absolutely insane stretch that has nothing to do with what I said. Clearly you aren't here to discuss, you're just here to soapbox. But I didn't sign up for your asinine TedTalk, so I'm just gonna block you so I never have to waste my time on you again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    That's probably your best bet champ.

    Enjoy fretting about made up points on a federated platform that doesn't track them and usually doesn't even correctly display them unless you interact with the comment, peak redditard.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    If we make it out the other end the bastard should hang for treason

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    “Detained” my ass.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (8 children)

    There's a loophole, and it allows the national guard to do this. From the Wikipedia article:

    The Act does not prevent the Army National Guard or the Air National Guard under state authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within its home state or in an adjacent state if invited by that state's governor.

    Kind of surprised the national guard are not included when all other branches were included during the Biden administration

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    They weren't invited by the states governor

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yes I know, why isn't Newsom ordering them to stand down?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Because they have been federalized and don't answer to him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    They do answer to Newsom, they were federalized illegally (directly and not via the governor) which is why California has sued the federal government. It's just a matter of him doing something instead of waiting around for the courts to strike down the federalization before taking action.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Those who work forces...

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Unless the guard troops are working directly with law enforcement, or are there at the request of the state, or the Insurrection Act has been invoked, none of which have happened or are the case, then it is completely illegal for them to be detaining anyone for any reason. Those troops should be refusing to follow those illegal orders.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yes, but will it be judged legal later by the courts? That is not an academic question and disobeying illegal orders require them to be judged illegal.

    The average reservist is not a legal expert but knows things are wacky. They not going to forfeit too much by guessing wrong. Especially when things are mild like this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    This is not mild, my friend ☹️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    So all the rabid 2A’ers are like “now’s our time, let’s go!” right? ……..right????

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The last thing we want to do is mobilize the gun Community. The 2nd Amendment is ony when the 1st Amendment has failed.

    So far the 1st is looking strong. I'm so far left that I own many weapons. I also know that we don't want to give the few psychotic military commanders like this a reason to shoot protesters.

    Socialists should all have arms and know how and when to use them. Liberals have constantly pushed people on the left to disarm themselves and made claims that only the right have arms. Very few people on the left will tell liberals they own firearms because they have been told to fear the gun instead of the person wielding the firearm.

    I hope we never have to fight a protracted guerrilla war in America. We aren't close to that yet, and I pray I never need to use my arms to protect my family and community. That's where gun owners are.

    We are only needed when the military fully takes up arms against the population.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Sucks troops are about to the first to be taken down before cops.

  • source