I would assume each question is independent of the others, so probably a T for 'last'

Yeah, in the most pedantic sense, the correct answer is "a", for "Louisiana"

Yeah, but the actual answer is how white are you?

And question 12, looks like the intent was below circle 3, but they put below circle 2. So is it a typo, or another intentionally ambiguous question where you can fail whoever you want?

That's a perfect example of its ambiguousness; I read that as "the number below [this question]" and assumed I had to cross out enough zeros to make it 1,000,000.

Compared to rest of questions, the one doesn't specify that the answer is contained in the sentence, By that logic, I'd say the first word is Louisiana.

I can help! So the first step is to be white, and then the second step is to do whatever you think seems right

Circle? It clearly says draw a line around whatever you decided wrongly to indicate. Lines don't curve and aren't boxes, so good luck.

A

I think.

Oh good, now we have three completely different answers

That's on purpose - white skin? it can be either one; otherwise both are wrong.

I would always assume not more than or equal unless it says so

It says "more than"

I mean purely pedantic, I have no idea the original test writers... but based on how I read the words

The number (one singular number needs to be crossed out)

Below one million, IE number < 1,000,000

So my conclusion

10000000000 < 1,000,000

Ah, but they can get you because a bunch of zeros isn't "a number".

You could cross out the first 1000000... leaving just the last zero, though.

Six zeroes, right? Five zeroes makes one hundred thousand. Six makes a million. Or am I missing something?

I'd second this interpretation... least based on my interpretation of "cross out THE NUMBER".

1 is a digit in the number below

0 is not one million

Aww, my suffrage. :(

You mean like how the house and senate are the ones who actually vote on the laws instead of direct democracy?

If there were a practical way to do it, a way to ensure that only those who were well informed on a topic could have a say in it wouldn't be an issue. The only barrier to voting would be your desire to inform yourself.

Unfortunately there isn't, because just about every word in the above sentences can be twisted by someone with illintent.
The concept isn't fundamentally flawed, it's just blocked by insurmountable obstacles.

In most places, citizens below a certain age can't vote, yet laws affect them as well. By extension, one could probably argue that some people "don't know what's best for them" and experts/educated people are better suited to make the laws.

(However, creating such a test would obviously be impossible in practice, and would result in a conflict of interest, leading to discrimination, as muusemuuse points out.)

The concept that only the educated should vote is essentially the entire advantage of living in a republic. If the test was actually fairly made it would be fine, the real problem is it would be used to limit specific demographics from voting while not actually ensuring only the educated can vote

Yes holy shit Jesus fuck yes I know this. Read again the second part where I said that there's no way to do this in reality.

Is too.

Please explain