"If she's a 10, you're probably an assett".
post
It's not a flex if they're sleeping with you for a nefarious reason
Somebody missed the memo of "doesn't matter, had sex"
Sex is not that hard to come by lol
True, I cum by sex almost every time
I'm only here because of sex
How many hot foreign spies have you slept with loser
It's because the jacket, right?
Seriously. In what world is "so powerful foreign governments send models to seduce me" a flex?
He has so much money he could literally hire someone to find him a different girlfriend for every day of the year and hire one additional person per girlfriend to make sure the girlfriend is happy. But no he has to fuck the girls from work.
This right here.
In evolutionary psychology terms, there is nothing more attractive than having a child that is legally guaranteed generational wealth.
I don't know if you've ever met anyone with generational wealth, but after a few generations they become extremely attractive.
100% its because of the power and authority he has over them, and the fear they have of losing their livelihood.
If memes were stocks, the Jensen Index would be of the charts right now.
It's crazy how after countless controversies, what finally takes them down is infidelity. Like the Klein guy recently.
This research goes to show why that's the case.
"Nine-in-ten Americans say having an affair is wrong. Republicans and Democrats differ sharply on the morality of abortion and homosexuality." https://www.pewresearch.org/?p=293690

They think the death penalty is more morally acceptable than someone else being gay?!
A patient choosing to end their life is more morally wrong than the death penalty? This must be the conservative "they deserve it" mentality.
I dont know how to comment about this freaking chart... what the hell is wrong with americans?
The problem with that is morality isn't binary. People will find some things more wrong than others without ever considering them moral.
Eating meat not being a moral issue according to a majority of people and only 4% of people condemning it? Thanks, ignorance and cognitive dissonance!
Where is the cognitive dissonance?
Their username maybe?
Oops, forgot I was on shitpost and made a serious comment, carry on
You didn't answer the question
Well how deep do you want to go?
Because one way or another, people seeing "eating meat" as not being a moral issue either don't understand the moral implications of it (industrial livestock farming for the most part) or don't care about it, and I suspect cognitive dissonance is doing the heavy lifting in the latter case.
People eat meat because they don't value animal lives like human lives. You can make a moral argument against that, and you'd have a good case for it, but it's not cognitively dissonant.
Yep, but I have yet to find a single person that would way that eating meat is not a moral issue if they know about industrial livestock farming.
I know about industrial livestock farming and don't believe eating meat is a moral issue. I believe the way we treat livestock is absolutely a moral issue (as well as an ecological and health issue), but not the actual eating of meat
Yeah we can split hairs all day, but you just agreed. Eating meat, 95% of the time, includes how we treat livestock.
In a survey, if they ask me if I think murder is a moral issue, I won't say no because I am thinking of self-defence. Abortion is a moral non issue, because most abortions are accidental. Good talk.
Again, lots of them know, they just don't care. Many people just do not care about non-human animal suffering.
They don't care. I don't think you are wrong for caring, just that you aren't being realistic. The life of a chicken has little value for 99% of people.
Everyone has a line between life that's of value and life that isn't. For some people chickens aren't on the same side as them, for some nothing is on the same side as them. There are extremes that are easy to consider insane or immoral, but things start to get different shades of grey once you get away from the edges.
It is exactly my point, no?
It's more about them either not knowing about it or choosing to pretend it isn't happening. Everyone knows. Actually, I think people care more about the environmental impacts than what the animals go through. It sucks but it is what it is.
You do understand that my point was that it was either ignorance or cognitive dissonance and you made this comment to explain exactly that to me?
My point is that it's neither. They know and they aren't pretending the animals are okay, it's just that most people don't give importance to the plight of a chicken.
It's a problem for you and not for them because your morals are completely different, not because you "know the truth".
As a meat eater I do care, although it's partly because meat tastes better from happy animals. I do think factory farming is immoral due to the treatment of the animals, though, it's just a 2 birds one stone thing.
It's absolutely a "know the truth" situation though. People wouldn't do to their pets what they pay people to do to other sentient beings that can do exactly what their pets can. Let me revise my first statement then : it's either ignorance, cognitive dissonance or cruelty. And I can't stand either of them.
Aren't you the guy that criticises parents for feeding their children meat despite having no kids or any background in pediatric nutrition?
What? Nope. Even if I was, what is your point? What if pediatric nutritionists told you children don't need meat to be fit and healthy?
Well, I had a similar argument with another vegan user whose avatar was similar to yours, and my pediatrician recommended we give our kid more liver so...
Well you can Google it, it's actually easy to give a vegan diet to kids from infancy where people care about selling the alternatives, but I understand some societies that are too reliant on meat products and kids with absorption issues, it doesn't make it a moral non-issue still, and I sure have not had a single pediatric nutritionist talk to me about liver lol
I was going to become vegan if I couldn’t handle personally raising and slaughtering an animal. Turns out… I can. The first time I killed a goat, one of the other goats gave birth to twins at the same time. I had a moment… individuals die, but the herd persists. These goats eat a bunch of naturally occurring grass and weeds. I can totally ice one and turn him into tacos a couple of times a year and it’s pretty much environmentally neutral. Absolutely morally neutral
You are just contributing to my point. See all the conditions you needed to have net to consider eating meat morally neutral there? Yeah, doesn't apply to industrial livestock farming.
I think the issue is more about the quality of life before the slaughtering. Your hand raised goats probably have a pretty good life, goat wise.
I mean, it was probably the part where China was getting sanctioned technology...
At least it's not kids this time? It's crazy that that's is the bar now
Definitely, the affair is a sidenote, the illegal funnelling of chips to China and blatant awareness of this crime within the Trump Admin is the story
Infidelity might be the headline, but clscratch a penny and you'll find support for a genocidal apartheid regime.
It’s more than obvious that this scandal is now being used to explain the complete failure of the financial system through such a trivial matter. These people apparently still think they need a scapegoat—this time they’re even presenting someone from their own ranks (presumably because he isn’t white).
I cannot, for the life of me, understand why social media is still buying into this. This is obviously the buildup to the inevitable crash, which was by no means caused by LLM technology itself, but rather by the ridiculously inflated expectations of the “financial experts.”
This may be amusing right now, but soon all of this will cost the little guys all their money. That’s as certain as death and taxes, since the U.S. is obviously incapable of even beginning to rein in its degenerate financial system—which is screwing over the entire world—as it’s controlled by the very few people who have a stake in this absurdity.
This has nothing to do with a CEO or his affairs, but with a failed system that is dragging everyone—who, absurdly, still clings to it—down with it.
This is not the fault of an CEO with Asian heritage and his mistress; it is what the U.S. system ultimately boils down to. Pinning it all on this case is absolutely indicative of the degenerate white supremacist oligarchy that the U.S. truly is.
It’s a nice comment with good points. If only it wasn’t written with AI. Ironic in a sense.
AI-written text remains very clearly distinguishable. This is not one.
You're serious?
They might be commenting on your often and consistent use of em dashes.
These people are so deluded that they can't imagine anyone not speaking English as a native language and therefore using a translator for the sake of simplicity.
It's pretty sad when you're so narrow-minded that you're unable to focus on the content of a statement rather than its form—well, that's Lemmy for you.
I heard he has an AI powered dick that makes women orgasm so hard they shut themselves
I thought the R/I format was dead and buried ten years ago
Edit: Man I really looked at this image and didn't have a single neuron fire in my head. One image and its reply statistics is not a meme. The "format" I had in mind is when someone would put two images next to each other with different stats below and the joke is that idea X spurs more discussion/horny image posting/whatever. The stats tell a story when you compare two sets of stats. I am a fraud. Forgive me.
This is through pure osmosis, never used the site.
“R/I format”? Are you talking about a 4chan post?


top 99 comments