all 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Of course that's confusing, one is a measure of speed, the other of volume.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 17 hours ago

    If you assume a standard size for a cup of tea and a standard size for an average nation then it's a measure of distance. The distance being the depth that the tea would reach if it was poured equally over the whole empire.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 day ago (8 children)

    I also do that face when I hear kilometres and colonisation spelt wrong.

    Also, my confusion face isn't Earl Grey flavoured, as I'm not some sort of lah-de-dah French Space Captain or whatever, so I drink normal Yorkshire Tea, which is obviously grown in the great tea fields of Yorkshire, which are real.

    And yes, I can hear spelling, and no, I can't prove it.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    As a non-native, I accept and welcome your insistence on spelling words the original way. Now let's make sure everyone spells and pronounces everything the original way, including

    • dachshund (da - ch=kh - s - hoond)
    • fuchsia (foo - ch=kh - see - uh)
    • bruschetta (broo - s - k - ettuh)
    • goulash is only accepted when talking about the Austrian version of the Hungarian original, gulyás (goo - yush)
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (2 children)

    metre may be closer to the original loanword but in no way does it match the english pronounciation, meter does that much better

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)

    Meet-uh
    (Or meet-ah, for Southerners)

    [Edit] Or, within 100 miles in random directions:
    Mittah
    Mi'ae
    Meit-eh
    Meet-uuuuuh
    Meet-rr
    Mittre

    Probably depends quite strongly on where you live.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago

    Furlongs per fortnight would be my preference.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (8 children)

    We seem to be getting the hang of metric when it comes to fitness and exercise.

    Attempting or even suggesting to use km when behind a wheel however still results in fear and confusion.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago

    What annoys me most is that we sell petrol in litres but still measure fuel efficiency in miles per gallon. Then America wanted its own gallon to feel special and so there’s the added confusion of which gallon when converting

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    As someone who doesn't really drive, I pretty much use metric for everything, I find it way more intuitive.

    I still think it's odd that we have this carve out for motorists, basically everything else (apart from pints of beer also) seemed to do the metric switch at the same time apart from them. I often get odd looks from people when using kilometres over miles for long distances

    I can only assume that metric was resisted in pubs partly because people assumed they'd take the 568ml pint and round it down to 500ml, or perhaps to save small pubs from having to replace all their glassware. Both seem workaround-able though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Switching is effort when there's infrastructure involved. Much like changing all the pub glasses, you'd have to change all the road signs, the driving test, and the speedometer in every single person's car!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I always assumed for signs it would be a case of stickers (like they do already for other changes) and then replacement over time as signs got renewed. I guess to go all out, we might need to move exit markers slightly given they're spaced 100 yards apart I think, but they're close enough to 100m for it to probably be fine

    I think most cars for as long as I remember can do both

    Changing the test just seems like a bit of bureaucracy, but maybe I'm simplifying that in my head

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    Good points actually! I suppose it would be doable, but it would probably be a massive expense (and hassle!) ultimately for not that much of a gain, so I can't imagine any politician actually stumping up the cash for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 23 hours ago (1 child)

    People in the UK use imperial for all kinds of things all the time, not just distance. I don't know anyone who knows their height in centimetres. Everyone still uses feet and inches. Land is still usually discussed in sq ft, acres, hectares etc. Weight (of a person) is still stones and pounds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 22 hours ago

    FWIW I use centimetres and feet relatively interchangeably for height and know a lot of others that do the same

    Weight is very much kg these days in my circles, I think older relatives are the only ones still using stone. Not sure when that flipped really as it was definitely stone when I was growing up

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    Just switch already; it makes things much easier.

    ~ someone who went from US customary units -> metricland

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    bergamot is genuinely disgusting

  • source