all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 14 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

Or... Ya know... You could charge them with criminal negligence as their product engaged in illegal hacking from their own corporate "controlled" environment.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 hours ago*

    "Their product" didn't "engage" in shit. It's a text generator.

    The company engaged in illegal hacking. By hooking up a randomized text generator to a Linux terminal with internet access and letting it to generate console commands unsupervised.

    LLMs are a very powerful tool. But we can't let the companies using those tools escape responsibility by giving LLMs any perceived agency.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 4 hours ago (1 child)

    They already reported it to you

    This is the part where you're meant to do something

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 hours ago

    take the fuckers to court

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago

    Mandatory reporting of AI risk is likely to be pretty useless, considering how poorly most people understand how LLMs work.. Will be interesting to see how they try to enforce it..

  • source