Yeah, there's lots of alternatives available.
If you have a sodastream machine that takes the screw-top canisters, you don't even need to buy a different machine, you can just start buying generic screw-top canisters.
Yeah, there's lots of alternatives available.
If you have a sodastream machine that takes the screw-top canisters, you don't even need to buy a different machine, you can just start buying generic screw-top canisters.
But she said Australia was not pursuing a blanket import ban on settlement goods, as other countries such as the UK, Spain, Belgium, Ireland and the Netherlands have either announced or imposed.
“We have concerns about the implementation of a blanket ban and unintended consequences for Australian businesses,” Wong said.
Cowardice, as we've come to expect from our government.
APAN/BDS Australia have a guide on boycotting Israeli dates in particular: https://apan.org.au/boycott-israeli-dates/
Of course, people should be boycotting all Israeli products, and other targeted businesses that enable and profit from Israeli crimes: https://apan.org.au/boycott/
Nice! I can confirm that my account has been verified automatically and I'm able to just navigate straight to the store pages for The Witcher 3 and Cyberpunk 2077. Am I remembering correctly that we used to get a dropdown age gate on those pages? If so, things are now smoother than they used to be. Still, they could have implemented this method to begin with.
In case anyone else was wondering, that flag is an unofficial flag design for 'Greater Sydney': https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/au-ns-gs.html
The Saint George Cross with the superimposed Southern Cross comes from the 'National Colonial Flag': https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Colonial_Flag
No idea what the political implications of it are, but the cookers love to spout off bullshit about archaic laws of some kind, so the colonial connotations probably tie in with that.
Was this intendsd as a reply to my comment? Because I'm all in favour of it, and it's why I spent the time finding the group's details. I mentioned the Green Left listings not as a 'go do this over there', but just as a tool for finding details like the ones you were looking for, and because I went looking for details there and thought it was odd I didn't find any.
The article mentions a large student demonstration in Australia on 12 November. If anyone knows about it please post any details as I can’t get through the paywall for The Advertiser in the link.
Here's a de-paywalled archive link of the Advertiser article: https://archive.is/OaNBl
The organising group is called 'High School Anti-Capitalists'. They look to have a website and Instagram accounts for Melbourne and Sydney groups.
Usually you'd find this sort of thing on the Green Left event listings, but there's nothing there for it. I noticed, though, that's there's a bunch of listings around the country for 'students say no to AI' protests on the 10th.
It took me a minute to find it, but this reminded me of research I'd previously heard of that also turns out to be from UNSW and in fact one of the same authors:
UNSW research finds solar can act as early bushfire warning system
While investigating on the effects of wildfire smoke on rooftop PV installations, University of New South Wales (UNSW) researchers have found that solar arrays, due to their sensitivity to smoke, could serve as an early warning detection of wildfires by providing temporal and spatial information on the presence and approximate concentrations of smoke.
So that's a silver lining to this problem.
Unfortunately, smoke concentration is high when wind speeds are low, so you could get a double-whammy of degraded solar and degraded wind generation. Usually the two are pretty complementary, so conditions where generation from both is reduced is something that needs to be addressed. Offshore wind power is less variable, so this might underline its importance, as well as generally spreading out generation and firming with batteries.
I’m so confused.
I think I can help!
Council Rates are calculated based on the value of the property.
This is already a major increase, since property values have skyrocketed in the last five years.
It's not laid out in a way that makes it particularly clear but the key point of clarification is that council rates don't grow with property values.
Allow me to explain...
First, the council first determines the total amount they will raise through council rates for a given year. The annual cap is a restriction on the growth of that total amount.
Secondly, they divide that total amount by the worth of all properties in the area to get the 'rate in the dollar'.
That is to say, the 'rate in the dollar' is calculated each year only so that the council rates can be charged proportionally to each property. It is not a fixed rate such that council rates would grow in line with house prices.
This is outlined on the page you linked, just above the bit you quoted:
How is a 'rate in the dollar' calculated?
For a council using only a general rate (some use special rates for particular projects or needs), the rate in the dollar is calculated as in the following example:
- A council plans to raise total rate revenue of $10 million.
- The total Capital Improved Value of all rateable properties in the municipality is $2.38 billion (Capital Improved Value means the value of the land, the building and any capital improvements made to the property)
- The rate in the dollar is calculated by dividing $10 million by $2.38 billion to obtain a rate in the dollar of 0.42 cents.
The 'rate in the dollar' has trended downwards over the last few decades precisely because property values have increased faster than local councils have increased their rates. You can find the full list of residential 'rate in the dollar' figures for 2000-2027 for the City of Melbourne on this page, but in summary, it was 6.4 in 2000/2001, and it's 3.98 in 2026/2027.
The rate cap amounts since 2016/2017 can be found on this page.
I haven't read it in full, but this report gives at least some indications that the cap hasn't kept up with inflation:
The fall in capped rates revenue per property is largely due to:
• Difference between inflation and the rate cap: in 2022–23, inflation was around 7 per cent while the rate cap was set at 1.75 per cent; in 2023–24, inflation was 4 per cent and the rate cap was 3.5 per cent
Obviously if a major revenue stream doesn't keep up with inflation, then there's eventually going to be a squeeze on expenditures, including wages.
From an article in 'Council' magazine:
The union said council employees have experienced a decline in real wages in recent years, attributing part of the issue to rate capping arrangements that limit councils’ ability to increase revenue.
According to the ASU, the average Victorian council worker earns approximately $70,000 a year and has experienced a real wage decline of up to 12 per cent since 2021.
I'm sure the ASU is aware that increasing council rates is unlikely to be popular. This is evident when they specify "modest reform to the rate cap" in that 'Council' article. Also, their members are themselves rate-payers, of course. If they thought there was another way to secure a decent deal for workers, they'd be pushing for that instead.
Details here if anyone's interested: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-07-06/abc-new-ai-policies/106844364
Guix is interesting! How do you find it for general use? Is it hard to get non-free software (e.g. Steam) running on it?
So, after years of stirring up outrage, while providing limited information and zero solutions, we get journalists saying ‘We are fire alarm; not the fuel’.
Horseshit. You are absolutely a part of the problem, if not a major contributing factor to it.
I don't think the article is a defence of the media or journalists. The only mentions of media and journalists are critical of them.
Remeikis, it seems to me, is defending protesters and dissent movements.
In the minutes after the news broke of the alleged (someone has now been charged, and so language must change with it) attack, blame was ascribed by commentators, and later the broader political class, to people who had protested a genocide, those who wanted more climate action, and the Left in general.
We’ve normalised police bashing peaceful protesters.
We are a nation who will tone police people protesting racism, but not the racists.
A group of protesters sitting outside an MP’s office, demanding higher standards of their leaders, is not the same as death threats and violence. But in criticising the legitimate threats, the political and media classes will point to democratic dissent as an example.
Terrifying!