I know this is a joke but donβt combine any of these meds. You might add Wellbutrin to lexapro or Zoloft, but you would never take them together, and your body metabolizes Effexor into the medication in pristiq so they wouldnβt combine those either.
post
Unfortunately that's just how psychiatry is. You can get a metabolic test done that tells what meds your liver metabolizes better, but ultimately it's throwing darts and hoping something sticks.
My son has a complicated set of prescriptions that restored him to euthymia after two years of hideous depression. I am so grateful for his cocktail.
Depression is the logical outcome of the system we live under.
Medications are only there to enrich your doctor! The medical industry only exists to extract profit! You don't need drugs - it's natural to be depressed, just look at how bad the world is! ADHD is a superpower! Autism is caused by vaccines!
- Things said by idiots.
(edit: Or just the misguided. Disillusion with the medical industry and all its myriad problems is understandable, but that doesn't make it a conspiracy nor does it mean the people who dedicate their lives to it are all profit-driven goblins that don't care about you. Overprescription is a hugely complex and heavily propagandized topic, but tarring all mental health professionals with this brush and discouraging people from getting what little professional help is available is indefensible)
Nowhere near as real as doctors genuinely believing pseudoscientific bullshit and having it thrive way past the point of disproven efficiency.
Looking at you, homeopathy and psychoanalysis.
Wait, are we really putting psychoanalysis on the same bucket as homeopathy now?
Pretty much. It's built on unverifiable claims, even Freud's own case studies ended wrecks, and it!s used today to support shit "diagnoses" like "this kid is autistic because his mother loved him too much". And there's all the bullshit coming from the forced proximity with the analyst, like false memories. It is, in many ways, a pseudoscience.
As for what can be determined through actual science, there were huge cross-studies that could not find any benefit to psychoanalytic therapy for treatment of most psychological problems.
Psychoanalysis is not an equivalent term to psychology. It's only a branch of it, one that shits on experimentation and proof because all the proof you need are in the ravings of an old weirdo from a century ago.
They cover Freud in psychiatry like you cover Satie in music, Picasso in art and Brecht in writing classes. That doesn't mean that the latest TV shows like Heated Rivalry are cubist versions of Mother Courage set to Gymnopedes. And how much Freud have you actually read and studied at a postgraduate level? Why do you mentioned Freud and not Lacan?
Politely, I think your opinion is under-informed.
They also teach obsolete models of the atom in science so students understand where we're coming from, but they don't still use them.
Not in postgraduate. Which the last comment made pretty clear that, at high levels, Freud is not seen as a complete fraud (mostly).
I have mixed feelings about Lacan, although that's not my real academic position.
None in postgraduate is looking at old models [of anything] as absolute truths.
I think i see the two senses of where the miscommunication occurred.
You can put psychoanalysis in the same bucket at homeopathy in that it doesn't work when studied by clinical trials, and mainstream practitioners don't use it.
On the other hand, Freud was not trying to be fraudulent, and did contribute tremendously to the field of psychology, unlike homeopathy's fraudulent relationship to medicine.
These are all generic drugs. No one is winning cruises for writing scripts on the $4 list.
Ahh yes, better living through modern chemistry.
And medicine as a skill/occupation, if you've been around it, isn't something you "do". But rather something you practice. I never one "did" medicine to or on any patient I dealt with in 20 years of being an EMT or Medic. I practiced medicine within my scope of practice, (there's that word again), just like any doctor or nurse.
And when you administer a medication/prescribe to a patient, that's called a "trial". Why is it called a "trial"? Be you have no idea what it's going to do to a patient. You simply go on past collective and professional experiences. And then you hand them a pill and wait to see what it does. It's going either cure them, do nothing, or it kills them. The 3 True Outcomes.
The first and last options means that you don't need to deal with the patient again. It's the middle option, "does nothing" that is a huge problem. That's when you pull out that bingo card in the cartoon and start trying to get your bingo some other way. And sometimes you even need to hit the blackout to get a bingo. And that's how you get the cartoon.
I will leave with this wise thought I got at an EMS symposium many years ago. The keynote speaker told us "That no matter how much we think we know about medicine and believe how advanced we've become in caring for people, it all still boils down to keeping the patient amused and letting nature take it's course".
this is anti-treatment propaganda.
I disagree.
This is question everything recommendation. Doctors are just people too. They can make mistakes, be out of date, or be corrupt.
But corrupt is very unlikely.
Do research. Read studies. Question. Challenge. And get the best result for yourself in the process.
Rearrange that and I would've gotten 2 bingos if we're counting all the meds I've been prescribed in my life
all 47 comments