Overview page: https://www.gog.com/en/anniversary

Direct sign up for Galaxy Linux beta: https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/t/YEF5EV/

top 96 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 107 points 1 day ago (34 children)

This is good news.

I’m really hoping that Valve will end up being a better stewart of the PC ecosystem than Microsoft in the long run.

Sometimes, It does really feel like the PC ecosystem can wither and die without them. I know we’re all enthusiasts here but I need to remind myself that we really do benefit from the larger ecosystem of PC owners. Without that demand being present, personal computers would really be for a few choice people and not all of us.

If the larger ecosystem collapses under the weight of one company (like Microsoft or valve) then there are bigger problems to solve like supply chain, trust, and support that no free and open source project will be able to handle. Not because it’s free and open source, but because the problems are just really really big and they take a lot of money to fix.

More people working on these problems is a good thing. I’m happy to see so much more happening on Linux regardless of my preferences.

  • source
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 day ago (16 children)

    I think the greatest strength valve has is being privately owned, rather than having to answer to investors. Combined with them genuinely appearing to care about the state of gaming, it's a big thing. Especially with their contributions to open source and Linux gaming.

    Microsoft and such are all about the money, quality assurance has quietly been abandoned over the years.

    Here's hoping we aren't disappointed years from now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Yep. If Valve ever announces an IPO, they should be considered dead and we should all start to migrate away.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    To where? Leaving behind your library? I doubt it. They would have to do a lot worse than that, but it would be a cataclysmic event for PC gaming and their days would be numbered..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

    The fact that they are privately owned is the reason why they are even capable of caring about things besides profit above all else. Large groups of people like boards of directors and shareholders are only capable of caring about things in their lowest common denominator that virtually every person cares about, such as having more money.

    Note how all VC-owned and publicly traded companies behave like perfectly predictable clones of one another. They are all just apparatuses for money production, with the actual product they sell, their literal means of making the money, an afterthought.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 22 hours ago (8 children)

    This is true, but also kind of depressing that Capitalism is now so insidious that people treat gaben like some kind of benevolent philanthropist for choosing to sit on a huge ongoing cash cow that makes more money directly to his bank account than he's physically able to spend, rather than IPO it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

    On a scale of rich guys, he's currently one that hasn't done stuff to upset me. But of course, he's no God. And the moment he or his company turn into soulless money whores, the trust will evaporate. But for now I'll be happy that they're contributing to things that don't directly generate cash for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago (5 children)

    Eh? How does becoming the main platform for Linux gaming not generate cash for them?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago (4 children)

    Who said anything about them not making cash. Just that it isn't their soul purpose. Their contributions to proton and stuff are helpful to everyone. And now it's encouraging the likes of gog and epic to try, with varying levels of quality. But it's something. It breaks us from the singular standard desktop gaming os.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago (3 children)

    they’re contributing to things that don’t directly generate cash for them.

    Who said anything about them not making cash.

    You did. Don't you read your own posts or something?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago (2 children)

    Them selling games makes direct profit. Them improving a compatibility layer for another operating system creates more potential customers, sure. But it also lets people play most of their games from elsewhere too.

    Proton isn't a direct cash generator, it's a fortunate bonus of them having so much money and nobody else to answer to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago (1 child)

    On one hand I think I finally see what point you were trying to make, but on the other it reinforces my original point even more that the bar is now that damn low that we've got people simping for a marketing strategy like it was some act of philanthropy, because it happened to create a useful thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago

    The good news is that Valve is not the steward of the PC ecosystem, even (or especially) on Linux. Everything they've contributed to Linux is open source, and they don't control it. Even if Valve disappears tomorrow, or enshitifies, there are tons of Linux distros and the packages are all public.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (13 children)

    I’m really hoping that Valve will end up being a better stewart of the PC ecosystem than Microsoft in the long run.

    Outside companies can't really contribute to Windows development and have no say, so it's 100% up to Microsoft to look after the Windows ecosystem.

    On Linux however, Steam can contribute to the kernel and both audio and graphics systems. All this apart from delivering their Steam service. The same will be the case for GOG, although they probably can't afford much, and the same will be true for Epic if they want.

    Linux has mainly been held up by server development on the professional side, and desktops have been mostly been an afterthought among the ones with the money. Even Linus Torvalds does not use Linux as his personal computer. So most of the Linux desktop was developed by personal private interests with help from Red Hat.
    But despite that Linux desktop is pretty damned awesome today with strong alternatives to Gnome. 😀

    It can never be the responsibility of Valve alone to keep the Linux desktop alive and thriving, they are merely part of it, and they have been a great boon for Linux, like Red Hat used to be who developed most of the GTK graphics back end, Gnome desktop, Pulse Audio and systemd.

    Linux desktop is a very very different ecosystem than Windows, in the way it works, kind of like how Eric Raymond tried to describe in his book The Cathedral and the Bazaar. Unfortunately he failed, and the book and ended out as mostly nonsense, but the book is famous anyway, because it does try to describe the gist of it.

    Sometimes, It does really feel like the PC ecosystem can wither and die

    The traditional PC is dying, no doubt about it. PC used to be a universal tool for everybody, it isn't anymore, many people have scrapped their PC, and now just use their phones and sometimes also tablets. The PC is a special interest tool today, and as such it will survive, but at a smaller scale than it used to be on. But as a special tool, it will also keep developing for those special "needs" like gaming, and the PC remains way ahead of any other form of game system in almost every way.

    Edit:
    Linus Torvalds does indeed use Linux desktop today, he Apparently uses Fedora.
    But for many years he didn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 day ago* (4 children)

    Linus Torvalds does not use Linux as his personal computer.

    Yes he does. I would imagine the same one he built on camera in 2025 for his desktop. He has been seen with mac laptops, but they had ashahi linux on them.

    Edit: I should add around 2011-2015 he did daily drive a mac, so a long time ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    around 2011-2015 he did daily drive a mac,

    That's what I knew, I never heard he changed to actually using Linux, last I heard he said the Linux desktop isn't good enough for daily use.
    I'm glad if he actually uses Linux desktop now. 😀

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    I thought Linus used Fedora and that systemd was made by Poettering as a personal project unrelated to his work at Red Hat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

    I'm pretty sure Red Hat financed it, although it was a pet project of his.
    Last I heard Linus was using a MAC.

    Edit:
    Apparently Linus does use Fedora now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

    His most recently stated preference is definitely Fedora: Linus Torvalds on Linus Tech Tips

    He specifically likes it (over say Ubuntu) because it's easy for him to build/replace the kernel whilst at the same time, it's a "just installs - just works" distro with no tweaking required.

    Edit: I see no evidence that Linus has EVER used MacOS as his daily driver, despite using Mac hardware several times.
    This is all way off topic, but "Even Linus I INVENTED LINUX Torvalds doesn't even use it" is wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

    Yes I was not aware he had done that, I have LTT blocked on Youtube because he's an asshole, so didn't see it.

    When I started using Linux in 2005 Linus was definitely using MAC, and I heard that a few times within the first decade. Linus also expressed that Linux desktop is not suitable as a daily driver.

    https://linux.slashdot.org/story/05/03/09/1314250/torvalds-switches-to-a-mac

    Torvalds Switches to a Mac

    I'm surprised it was a bit hard to find, and I had thought I'd find better sources on it, but apparently it's hidden behind things that have happened since.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 22 hours ago* (1 child)

    And yes, he is running Linux on it ;)

    It's literally right there.

    Edit: The article needs to be dug out of the waybackmachine: https://web.archive.org/web/20050309174306/http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/0,39023165,39183867,00.htm

    Torvald's response came quickly and succinctly. "My main machine these days is a dual 2GHz G5 (aka PowerPC 970) - it's physically a regular Apple Mac, although it obviously only runs Linux, so I don't think you can call it a Mac any more ;)" he said.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 21 hours ago

    OK then I've been mistaken for 20 years. 🙁
    But the context that he was running Mac and he criticized the Linux desktop for not being suitable for a daily driver, lead me to this obvious conclusion.

    For some reason I have never seen an article before that he uses Mac but with Linux on it??

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 60 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (22 children)

    For those of you who were able to switch to Steam, I understand why this isn’t very interesting for you, but GOG has a huge library of very old games that Steam does not have, so this is still a pretty big deal, even if it took a really long time.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    GOG also adds community patches to old games very often, so their releases work better than their Steam equivalent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 22 hours ago

    Also because of their no-DRM policy, some Windows games from GOG are actually more compatible with Wine because the DRM was removed.

    In my Steam collection I actually have a situation of a game which won't run in Linux from Steam no matter what I do, yet the pirate version of that game runs just fine in Linux (and in fact that's the only way I can enjoy my purchase), whilst in my much larger GOG collection I have no such situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    To add, they originally repack(so it run on modern computer) and sell old game, which is why they named it Good Old Game.

    I'm just happy that i can play Witcher 1 and 2 i bought on GOG last time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Heroic Launcher connects with GoG, so you don't need to wait for this. I'm still happy it's coming, but we do have other options.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 22 hours ago (1 child)

    Same with Lutris.

    Personally I prefere store independent launchers that aren't constantly trying to sell me shit or market shit to me, or which were designed to try and tie me to their ecosystem.

    None the less, that GOG is actually puting out a version of their launcher for Linux is a good sign, even if I personally won't use it same as I did not use it back when my game machine was Windows.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 21 hours ago

    One nice thing about GoG Galaxy, at least a version I used a very long time ago, is it is actually an agnostic launcher as well. It could connect to Steam, and other services, to automatically manage your unified library. I have no idea if it's still like that on Windows or if the Linux version will be like that. It was very non-judgemental and not pushing purchases, like Steam does. This was like a decade ago though, so that may not be true anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    For me if the GOG client can't offer better support than Lutris I don't see a reason to use it over Lutris. Not going to lie, the bar is kinda low as I don't particularly love Lutris but the bar is there for the GOG launcher.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    I started with Bottles, then switched to Lutris, which dramatically improves the experience. I now (and for a while now) use Heroic Launcher. It's my preference. Lutris has still been useful, in particular for installing Escape from Tarkov from an install script for Singleplayer Tarkov (or whatever it's called now). Heroic doesn't support that as far as I'm aware. It does connect with Steam, GoG, and Epic though, so you can buy and play games from those through it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    When I buy a game I check if it's on GOG first.

    I have a HUUUGE steam library... Thanks to a few years of Humble Monthly. But really I prefer GOG.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Yeah I usually do the same. Offline installers are a pretty big benefit. I like to know a lot of games are available offline.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 22 hours ago*

    Also because of their no-DRM policy which forces games publishers to remove any DRM from their titles before they can sell them there, older Windows-only AAA games sold there don't have the $&/"%*$# DRM that often makes them almost impossible to run under Wine or Proton.

    I mean, you still have games from GOG that won't run under Wine no matter what you do, but at least you don't have the situation like you have with Steam were the game you bought won't run in Linux yet a downloaded pirate version of it runs just fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (8 children)

    You're assuming those will work on GoG, that might not be the case unless they do something like Proton, otherwise those old games are Windows/DOS only and so you would have to manually download the binaries and run then through wine or something, so Galaxy coming to Linux wouldn't affect this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • Lutris & Heroic already install all windows GOG games into Wine +/- Proton prefixes using some simple automation. The bar for an official GOG launcher to achieve the same isn't that high if they want to go down that route. Proton is freely available and open source, so GOG can use it too if they want (and would be sensible to do so).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago* (5 children)

    Proton is not part of Steam. It's a package that you can run games on from anywhere. Yes, this will need WINE and likely Proton, and it's easy enough to have the launcher use those, as Heroic and Lutris already do (or as you can do from the terminal).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    I know it's theoretically easy, but that doesn't mean GoG will do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 21 hours ago (1 child)

    It seems like a particularly stupid design choice to make a launcher for Linux and yet refuse to do something that both simple and required for most Windows game to work in Linux which is launching them with Wine AND DXVK, same as Lutris and Heroic do.

    You're basically just insisting that they could be purposefully incompetent.

    Sure, technically, they could, but then what would be the point of spending money on a GOG Galaxy Linux version given that only a small fraction of the games in their store have a native Linux version?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 21 hours ago

    It took them over a decade to implement the most requested feature which could have probably accomplished in one afternoon as GoG Galaxy is an electron app, and they didn't, I'm not holding my breath expecting them to be competent.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 22 hours ago (1 child)

    Sure, and were also assuming it works at all. What's your point? It'll almost certainly have something like this or there's no point in them making it at all.

    Regardless, it still doesn't even rely on them because, like I said, you can do it yourself from the terminal. You could just write a simple script to launch the game and they'd run. Proton exists. It isn't a Valve thing that they have to remake.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 21 hours ago

    It'll almost certainly have something like this or there's no point in them making it at all.

    GoG has native games for Linux, at the time the feature was initially requested to GoG Proton wasn't a thing and we had to do janky stuff to run windows games on Steam. I'm not saying GoG won't do it, I'm saying people are assuming it will just because everyone else does, which might not be true. Hopefully it is, but it's just an assumption.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 43 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    i want to play this map in worms

    ❤️ 1
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 38 points 1 day ago

    This is huge.

    Will probably still use Heroic, but I'm happy to see more choices

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 16 hours ago

    Might not be a huge deal for current Linux users, because of Heroic and Lutris are well known and widely used, but for gamers who are about to switch from Windows this could be another reason to do so.

    I saw many "how to switch to Linux" guides where they had to stop at the gaming section and explain Proton/Wine/Heroic/etc

    It sounds much easier: If you want to game on Linux there is a native Steam and GoG clients.

    Lots of people loves achievments and cloud saves.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 day ago

    Really happy to see this. Hopefully others follow.

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 1 day ago (29 children)

    Good to know, and hopefully I step in the right direction, but for me it's too little too late, since I first requested GoG to port their stuff to Linux, Valve has:

    • Released a client for Linux
    • Ported their games to Linux
    • Created a standardized target for Linux
    • Financed Wine and dxvk development
    • Released and maintained Proton
    • Released Linux based platforms multiple times

    And in short has spent lots to increase Linux adoption. I might install it and check out some old games that might not be available on Steam if they have an easy way to run them like Proton. But I have since spent thousands on Steam, not to mention I mostly use Steam as my main UI on most of my gaming systems.

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 day ago (26 children)

    Difference is, Gog has the moral high ground so to speak. In Steam you don't own shit - sure, there are convoluted ways to download the installer archives, but it's a joke compared to GOG.

    Other than that, I agree with everything you said.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    There are actually many DRM free games on Steam [link], most notably Cyberpunk 2077.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    Cyberpunk 2077 is DRM free because it's made by CD Projekt Red, the same company that runs GOG...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

    True, they owned it when CP2077 was released.

    They no longer own it though.

    That doesn't explain the thousands of other DRM-free games on Steam though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 21 hours ago* (2 children)

    In Steam you can't make an informed purchasing decision to only get a game if it doesn't have DRM, because they don't inform you of it upfront.

    Further, steam-api is itself a light form of DRM, even if it can be mostly worked around by those with sufficient technical proeficiency by using something like the Goldberg Emulator.

    Meanwhile in GOG no games have DRM and you can definitelly make an informed purchase decision that considers the presence or absence of DRM there.

    Your argument would have weight if Steam gave you the choice of not buying games with DRM if you didn't want to by informing you of which have it and which don't, but that's not at all the case - you buy the game and only after that do you discover if your brand new single player game phones home every time it starts and refuses to run if there's no Internet connection.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 18 hours ago (1 child)

    This is just total crap. Every game on Steam tells you if it has a 3rd party launcher, anti-cheat and if it requires an internet connection. No other store discloses stuff so consistently and in such detail that I know of.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

    That's an outright lie.

    For example, this has no "requires internet" disclosure and yet if you try and start it offline for the first time it won't run and even after that if you have it offline for more than a week or so it stops working (I know because it happened to me on vacations).

    Most games integrated with the Steam API require the game to be online and able to reach the Steam servers both for first start and at least once in a while, something that's not disclosed in the Steam store page for those games.

    Further, it doesn't get more consistent as disclosures on DRM go than GOG's "None of our games have DRM", so your "no other store" is also a lie.

    If you're going to fanboy for Steam, at least stick to their true qualities and don't make shit up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (15 children)

    I feel like this and DRM are the two things people point out as GoG's benefits, but first of all GoG also sells you a license, so it's EXACTLY the same as Steam. The "difference" is in the other point, because without DRM games bought on GoG can be backed up and installed again without needing GoGs approval, but this ignores two HUGE caveats:

    • GoG also allows DRM on their store, with some games having DRM for DLCs or extra content.
    • Steam doesn't require DRM, so all games that are DRM free on GoG are most likely also DRM free on Steam.

    All in all this means that in regards to ownership morally GoG is essentially the same as Valve, they just have better PR about it.

    PS: To give credit where it's due, GoG is a lot more restrictive with what DRM it allows, and you can expect most of the game you bought to be playable without DRM there. However I feel that allowing me to play on my libre OS is a lot more morally significant than the difference between those two DRM stances.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (14 children)

    Genuine question, can you start these DRM free games that you own via steam without the steam launcher?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (12 children)

    Absolutely, otherwise the game wouldn't truly be DRM free. There are some games that have a different version on Steam that on GoG where the game crashes if it can't find steam running, IMO those are badly programmed games and while it is technically DRM I would put those into a category of unintentional DRM, and there is an easy crack which is to replace the steam library they ship with with a fake one that replies as if it were steam. And while easy to do I would not call those DRM free.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

    TIL, I thought all steam games had to be run via the steam launcher.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 21 hours ago*

    Further, even if they are integrated with Steam via the Steam API (they literally are shipped with a steamapi.dll), you can usually get around the soft DRM of it using something like the Goldberg Emulators (basically a version of that DLL that doesn't connect to Steam's systems).

    The problem is that if you care about games having or not DRM, you can't make an informed purchase decision in Steam because they don't give you information about that when you're considering buying a game, so you only find that out after you bought it.

    This is even more of a problem that merelly single player games that won't run offline because some forms of DRM which aren't phone-home DRM can still make it impossible to run that game with Wine or Proton - I have a game from Steam which won't at all run in Linux no matter what I do, yet a pirated version of it runs just fine with Wine.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 21 hours ago (8 children)

    Does Steam tell you upfront before you buy the game if it's DRM free, or is it always a happy surprise when you brand new single player game doesn't fail to startup because it phoned-home and your Internet connection was down?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 21 hours ago (7 children)

    It does, kinda, there are warnings for games that require certain things like kernel level anti-cheat or 3d party accounts, although I think they should have an extra one for always on DRM which is particularly nasty and troublesome for people on a steam deck so there's reason for them to warn on that.

    But also, you have 14 days to return a game as long as you have less than 2h of play, if this is a major concern for you you can run the game offline and ensure it works otherwise refund it. There are also unofficial curators run by community that allow you to quickly see if a game is in those lists which is a nice community way to ensure weird cases are captured. Still would be nice to have more official stance from Valve on hard DRMs, hopefully with GoG coming to Linux they might have to care more about it, but we'll see.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (6 children)

    Often you don't know or care your game won't run offline until your Internet is down and you just want to play a game and it won't run. Also some kinds of DRM are totally invisible until certain conditions happen (say, you upgrade components in your PC and now the DRM thinks it's a different machine).

    Even if without fail you install and test every single game you buy from Steam games for DRM before you actually play them (so as not to exceed the 2h), making sure you do so within 14 days of purchasing, and refund them if they do have such DRM, or for every single game you're considering buying, spend time trawling through support communities upfront to see if they have such DRM, you still won't know for sure if that game has some DRM that will stop you from playing it a later date - maybe the offline stuff only triggers after X days offline, maybe the DRM is doing the whole machine ID stuff and breaks only if you change enough or specific components in your PC, maybe it's just something that cause needless problems running it under Wine, and for all those things maybe nobody that had problems with it wrote about them in whatever support forum forum you checked.

    Unreliable workarounds aren't actual solutions.

    Meanwhile you can buy from GOG without such hassles or risks that you have when buying games from Steam to make sure they're free of nasty DRM, a totally unecessary massive hassle as Steam could easily list for each game if they gave DRM or not and which kind of DRM they have if they do, but they choose not to.

    My point is that with its current stance Valve is at best purposefully supporting anti-consumer stances from some game publishers which would suffer in terms of sales if their bullshit DRM was prominently signalled in the store listing for their games.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 17 hours ago (5 children)

    I don't disagree with most what you said about Steam, I really wish they were more strict about DRM and disclosure of it, I think they have a lot to improve in that area, and you are absolutely right that just because there's a workaround doesn't mean it's not a problem.

    In fact the only thing I disagree with is this:

    Meanwhile you can buy from GOG without such hassles or risks that you have when buying games from Steam to make sure they're free of nasty DRM

    You do know GoG allows DRM on their store, right? And that you don't have curators or similar to have a workaround, your only hope is to go through this thread https://www.gog.com/forum/general/drm_on_gog_list_of_singleplayer_games_with_drm/page1 to find if it's listed there.

    I'm not anti-GoG or pro-steam, I wish both of them to succeed because I want to play DRM free games on my Linux machine, but I feel that GoG gets a lot of good propaganda for things they're only doing marginally better than steam.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (4 children)

    Yeah, they sometimes fail in enforcing their own stated policy.

    While quite a number those things are so so, many are clear breaches of that policy (for example the Absolver one at the very start and the Cyberpunk 2077 one).

    Personally in my 200+ collection of games from GOG I never had such problems, whilst my Steam collection of around 20 games has several titles with DRM to the point that one of them won't even run from Steam in Linux but the pirate version (which is cracked) runs just fine.

    None the less, you make a fair point.

    Personally I currently favor GOG because with their "No DRM" (except when they fail at it, as you pointed out) and downloadable offline installers, I de facto have the same ownership rights of the games I purchase as I used to have in the pre-Internet days when I bought a game CD (later, with the Internet, even physical games started having online validation), and if a different store was giving me that I would support them equally for that.

    It's really about how far in practice do my ownership rights of a game go rather than store X or store Y, so stuff like blocking from playing a single player game in a machine which is offline or at any point the "game license" being revoked, the game removed from my collection and now I can't ever play it anymore (which, by the way, is also a risk in GOG if you don't download the offline installer) are big problems to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

    Yup, I can totally see that logic, but as someone who's using Linux as their main OS for a long while being able to easily play the game on my system is more important than most instances of DRM (although always on DRM is not acceptable to me). My reasoning is that if I have to jump through hoops to get the game to run on my machine by for example having to setup a wine prefix and figure out things for it I'm not paying for that game, if they don't care for me as a customer, then why should I pay them?.

    For a long time that meant only native games got my money, and back then I used to buy stuff from GoG as all being the same their no DRM policy is better than Valve's. But Valve invested heavily on Wine and Proton, which not only improved my experience inside their store but also outside of it, so I see a lot of return in giving them money, whereas GoG I'm getting the same experience from them than from the pirate bay or whatever kids are using nowadays, so I don't see a reason to give them money.

    All of that being said, when GoG Galaxy comes to Linux, and if they integrate wine with it in a useful way, I plan on having a look at the old games catalog and possibly throw some money their way to encourage both Linux and DRM free support, but nowadays rebuilding my game library elsewhere would be prohibitly expensive, not to mention the pains of having to deal with multiple launchers, systems, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

    I use Lutris as my launcher in Linux and the level of convenience to run Windows games in Linux with it is slightly superior to Steam (superior mainly because I like to run my games inside a sandbox with networking disabled, which I can easily do in Lutris but not Steam, plus I don't have the launchers always running in the background and it's very rare that I have to wait for Lutris to update when I want to run a game and start it, whilst with Steam it's pretty common that I try to start a game and then spend a few minutes waiting for Steam to update itself and/or the game, when all I want is to run the bloody game and don't care about it being the latest version), though for most people it should be around the same or maybe even a bit more for Steam if you care about automatic updating of the games before they're run (which Lutris won't do for GOG games - it will fetch and install game updates but you have to tell it to do it) and certain Steam API facilities such as cloud-saves and showing achievements to your friends.

    My total failure rate of running Windows games from GOG using Lutris as the launcher is about the same as that of running Windows games from Steam because Lutris too does the whole Wine + DXVK thing and has launch scripts for most games, though Steam does seem to have problems with AAA games from a certain generation (around the 00s) that won't run in Linux whilst the pirate version of the same game runs just fine from Lutris, which is probably due to the DRM for those games back then which I remember was a real pain in the arse and which is still present in the Steam version.

    So my no-DRM thing is also a bit about running my games in Linux - because sometimes DRM gets in the way of that - though it is mainly about ownership and controlling myself when and how I run the games I bought and not actually losing access to a game because it was taken down from the store.

    In fact I have no intention of using a Linux GOG Galaxy as my launcher in Linux, same as back when my gaming PC was Windows I didn't use the Windows one, I just hope GOG finally making one for Linux signals that they're taking Linux gamers more seriously and maybe they'll do like Steam and contribute some open source code to the gaming ecosystem in Linux, as that will benefit us all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 hours ago (1 child)

    Yeah, I understand all that, but first of all I have 4 gaming systems, 3 of them boot straight to Steam big picture (Desktop plugged to my living room TV, Steam Deck and Steam Frame), while I could have my gaming laptop for something different it just makes it easier to use the same on all systems, plus I would miss on cloud saves which make it seamless to switch from one system to another.

    But here's the thing, to run things in Lutris I have to set it up myself, and setting it up with GoG downloaded installers or pirated versions is essentially the same, so what exactly is GoG providing me that I can't get by pirating? Am I only paying them for the legality of it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

    You don't have to set up anything yourself in Lutris for games from GOG - you just go to the GOG view in Lutris where it lists all your games in GOG and click "Install" on the game you want to install and play: Lutris has scripts for the vast majority of GOG games that will automatically do whatever tweaks are needed to be done to Wine to run it so you don't have to do anything beyond that.

    It's about as likely that you have to do anything further than clicking "Install" to get a GOG Windows game to run from Lutris as it is likely that you have to do anything beyond clicking "Install" to get a Steam Windows game to run from Steam, and even if you do get an issue, like with Steam in Lutris most of the problems are solved by just switching in a pull-down box in the config for that game to get it to use the latest Wine or Proton version.

    As I said, I get no more hassle with running GOG Windows games in Linux with Lutris than I have running Steam Windows games in Linux with Steam.

    If you run pirate games from Lutris, THEN you do often have to set it up yourself since Lutris doesn't have install scripts for such versions of the game at which point one does indeed need to dive into logs and poke around Winetricks to get the game to run (though you might get lucky, especially with DODI repacks).

    Even if installing and launching GOG games from Lutris wasn't that convenient, you would be paying GOG rather pirating the game to pay the makers of the game for having made something you enjoy, and in fact I would recommend you to buy the game directly from the makers if you can bypassing the games stores (ANY games stores, GOG included) so that they get the maximum amount possible as they're the ones doing most of the work and the games stores are just middlemen taking advantage of market inefficiencies and networking effects in games distribution to get a disproportionate cut of the money for doing a tiny fraction of the work.

    As a question of principle I actually chose to pay for games in GOG when I could just download pirated copies of the GOG offline installers for those games and install them just as easily - the Lutris scripts for the GOG versions of the game work for both direct download from GOG and for local offline installer files, and those local offline installer files can just as easily be pirated copies as they can be something you downloaded from GOG.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Not really. GOG has the moral highground on game ownership but Steam has it on hardware ownership, which I would argue is more valuable. I do wish Valve would do more against all of the terrible trends in the gaming industry but I'll accept everything they're doing to push forward an open ecosystem as a whole instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Valve also has the absolutely massive advantage of a significantly larger amount of income. It's like complaining that an indie game doesn't have the graphics that a AAA game has. Sure, it's great that Valve is contributing some amount to Linux, but they can afford to. It's also not purely to be nice either. They are expecting the investments to have returns.

    I'm not going to complain that GoG took a while. I'm only going to be happy they eventually have taken the step. It's probably at no insignificant cost to them, and they easily could have just not bothered, but they see the market moving and are trying to get ahead of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 21 hours ago

    First of all let's get something out of the way, I don't think Valve is doing anything to be nice, they're doing it because it's in their best interest, however their best interest happens to align with mine.

    I don't expect GoG to do what Valve is doing, but porting Galaxy to Linux has been the most requested feature on GoG for a LONG while, and honestly it's not that hard to do, especially considering they have a Mac version. If they can't even dedicate one programmer for one month to implement the most requested feature for their app, and allow me to play their games on my "steam machine" then they don't really care about my money.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 22 hours ago*

    Whilst I definitelly didn't use this when I had Windows and much prefer general launchers like Lutris and Heroic which aren't tied down to specific game stores (and thus, amongst other things, aren't constantly trying tosell you and market you shit, or purposefully designed to make it hard for you to run your games outside them) and instead use those store's REST APIs to do things like download and install the games, it's a good sign that finally GOG is making a version of their launcher for Linux.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

    Fine i guess. Just a bit worried about all that vibe code. I hope it will not turn out to be hyper-hackerable.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›