top 84 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 year ago

What is Fox talking about?

  • source
  • [–] 136 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'd say it's because during Biden's term he was running a fairly basic administration and during the run-up to the election, inflation was something they (repubs) could use to rile up the base, but now not only is the election long over, there's so much new horrible stuff every day (both real and made-up) in the spotlight that inflation pales in comparison.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Also, Biden was actively tackling the problem by having investigations into large grocer chains and brandnames who reported record profits and increased prices, and we talked about that whether we were on his "side" or not. He also prevented a couple of mergers/acquisitions such as the Krogers Alberstsons merger. And that was boring in most cases and in some cases ineffective.

    Now that nothing is being done about any of it, theres less to talk about except "experts say this is really bad and it's going to get much much worse. Now for the weather forecast, take it away Carl."

    "Actually, Bob, with the loss of weather monitoring funding we're back to relying on Almanacs and to avoid liability I've been asked to not call it a forecast but a weather prediction."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Because the pro-Trump media now tells people it's because of the long-lasting effects of the Biden admin. Here in Hungary, we're still being told the awful state of the healthcare system is due to the Gyurcsány-era, that was in 2010(!), although they started to mix it up with a little "the EU isn't sending us money because we made a law that labels gay people pedophiles".

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Fucking EU always screwing us over. We're still waiting for our £300,000,000 a day for the NHS that the EU is feeding to brown people.. or whatever it was that we were promised

    It's definitely not governments lying constantly, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Last year, there was not a single conservative person in my "circle" that wasn't constantly griping about the cost of eggs and "Bidenflation". Poor souls could not afford to eat anymore, the only protein they supposedly lived on was eggs, but the price of those was so high they were just going without.

    The moment that Trump took office, egg prices spiked again and suddenly these people understood that the president doesn't control the price of eggs and besides eggs cost so much due to the effects of bird flu. Suddenly these people who couldn't previously afford anything but eggs to eat are telling me that they're having roast beef for dinner, then pork chops, and so on. Literally nothing has changed in their lives except there's a different president and nearly everything is far more expensive, and yet all the financial woes they were complaining about this time last year no longer seem to exist.

    I even mentioned the price of coffee, milk, and beef in a recent conversation. Supposedly these things were higher when Biden was president (not true), and when I refused to budge on that, suddenly it's back to "well the prices are determined by complex market conditions" and "the president has brought down the price of many other things like eggs".

    It's literally impossible to have a logical and factual conversation with these types of people.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    The eggs thing wasn't complex market conditions, companies saw an excuse to raise prices in unison, they tripled their profits, and are slowly lowering them as sales decrease due to people buying fewer eggs. They're still up 200%.

    If you want to know what lowering food prices looks like, ask the chinese. Each city I went to had arrays of different policies, none of which started and ended with "give money to giant ag companies and the means to exploit migrant workers." Lot of policies helping retirees start micro farms.

    30 eggs for 2USD related.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    I know you know this, but I have to jump on the train here.

    This is what Fox told them to say, and now they’re not. The whole thing is so obvious to anybody not in their clutches. I have a friend who, after the Jan 6 insurrection, was “done with Trump”. Guess who voted for him again and is convinced he’s doing a great job.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago

    True, but the news is freaking out about it a lot less, and spending a lot less time interviewing people about what percent of them might feel like it's personally the president's fault and he should definitely lose the next election because of it because people are hurting right now and he doesn't care.

    It is, as the man said, notable. In fact it seems like they've totally moved on from feeling like inflation is an important issue to pay close attention to and freak out about.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5mlx_DnIEo

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    only the news stopped talking about prices

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Because it’s* worth it seems the likely answer.

    *racism, genocide, anti-science, anti-LGBTQ+, anti-health, trickle-up billionaires, misogyny, state religion, and more.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I find it interesting you put the asterisk on the first it whereas i would have put it on the second. I wonder why that is!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The asterisk is for the footnote from "it's**". In other words, the asterisk is for the entire line.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    Same reason the clown is elected twice in the first place, the media in this country is completely irresponsible and run by profit driven assholes with zero ethics, a major problem in everywhere.

  • source
  • [–] 105 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I mean, because the left and center are concerned more with the collapse of democracy and the rule of law and the right wants all brown people to die.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Killing all the brown people was how we were supposed to get cheap eggs. The brown people were making our eggs expensive so we had to spend $600M on an Everglades concentration camp

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago*

    ap•o•plec•tic | ,apa'plektik|

    adjective informal

    overcome with anger; extremely indignant: Last year, tons of people were apoplectic about food prices.

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago* (12 children)

    What's crazy is that ground beef is practically a waste product. You can get it for under $4/lb in Houston. Hell, come by certain grocery stores at the end of the day and they're trashing buckets of it.

    $6.12 for something that's filling up garbage cans and landfills to the tune of 429.2 million lbs in 2022 alone? Seems like Americans are getting price gouged.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    536,000 cows, forced to sit in their own shit for 18 months just to be unceremoniously slaughtered and thrown right in the trash, like some fucked up torture treadmill

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    like some fucked up torture treadmill

    Welcome to industrial animal agriculture. I stopped eating animal products 7 years ago. My only regret is not making this change earlier.

    And before someone says "just buy from small local farms": I live in an urban area. Unless I burn gas driving all over fuck, the industrial animal ag products are what is in the stores. Easier for me to just go plant-based.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "Just buy from small local farms," a phrase spoken exclusively by people who do not just buy from small local farms.

    7 is a good year, on average most of the cells in your body have already been replaced. You're almost entirely made of plant material at this point lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    7 is a good year, on average most of the cells in your body have already been replaced. You're almost entirely made of plant material at this point lol

    Animals only eat plants, so they're plants, so I'm really eating plants

    /S

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Just curious because you're specifically using the term plant-based: are you eating plant-based or are you vegan? If not the latter, how come?

    No judgements whatsoever - just curious

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I use the "plant-based" label because people get weird about the v-word, and quite frankly I'm only super-strict about meat and egg so don't think I've really earned the title. I avoid dairy, but it shows up in a lot of unexpected places so I give myself some leeway with micro-ingredients. Why? Because it's more effort than I'm willing to put in. I know that won't be a satisfactory answer to diehards, but it is an honest one.

    Or perhaps you are asking if it is only about food? I don't use non-food animal products either (e.g. leather, wool, down).

    My last paragraph is really more rhetorical because it's a very predictable "whatabout." While not wanting to bother with the effort certainly is true (in-line with my attitude on dairy micro-ingredients), having easier availability to small local farms wouldn't change anything in this regard. I'd still stick to a plant-based lifestyle. If anything, it's something I might have used as a crutch while phasing out animal products. But I am past that now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Wait, are the micro-ingredients you're referring to the traces of dairy you get with most foods you buy? Like even food that's specifically labelled as vegan? Not quite sure what else you could mean since these products would still be considered vegan since they're not made up of or consist of animal products.

    But yea, it's tough to keep scanning ingredients list for potential non-vegan ingredients. It's relatively easy for food for me nowadays but stuff like soaps, face wash, laundry detergent and stuff like that that's not always explicitly labelled as vegan can be tricky to navigate around. Nail polish is easy because I found a brand that's specifically vegan and cruelty-free. :)

    You'll get there some day (if you want that). We all start out small and it takes some effort, but it's manageable in the end. 💚

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I avoid dairy, but it shows up in a lot of unexpected places so I give myself some leeway with micro-ingredients. Why? Because it's more effort than I'm willing to put in. I know that won't be a satisfactory answer to diehards, but it is an honest one.

    This is part of the problem with the “v-word” movement. There are so many purity tests when, in the end, it is literally impossible to avoid all suffering. Industrial agriculture kills untold gobs of animals and insects. Almond farming uses shit tons of water that would otherwise feed a healthy habitat. Having a cat or dog means participating in the animal products industry as well.

    This doesn’t mean “give up”, but it does require the admission that there is no ultimate piety that can be achieved - despite what some would have you believe. They are either willfully ignorant or lying to further an agenda. All we can do in our position in modern society is try our best to minimize suffering, with the understanding that there will always be some.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    It really is incredible how much land is used, pollution created, and environmental devastation caused to create more waste for landfills, furthering the aforementioned problems. Meanwhile, folks starve next door and around the globe. Coming down from the trees was a terrible decision.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Because media focus shifted. People will be mad with what the media tells them to be mad at.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    gov controlled media strikes again

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Is it because they are talking about Epstein? No? That's weird.

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Beef prices should go up, along with all meat prices, to reflect their ecosystemic toll. The problem is basic staples are also expensive.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    yeah stop the corn and soybean subsidies and actually charge ranchers for letting their cattle graze on federal land and then the price will reflect what the real price of meat is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    and actually charge ranchers for letting their cattle graze on federal land

    That's how we got the shit with Cliven Bundy a while back. Fucking right wingers whine when they don't get free money for nothing and have to pay for the externalities their actions create.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Absolutely this. Essential food should not be expensive. Meat, especially red meat, should be quite expensive and something you only eat rarely

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Won't this threaten your livelihood?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago*

    Do anyone still remember the drama with egg prices? Or is it just me?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    the absolutely wild thing about this is that australia is/was also complaining about a cost of living crisis, and our food is $ for $ roughly the same… as in our numeric value for food is the same - despite our currency being worth about 2/3 as much

    this doesn’t mean that australia has our cost of living crisis easy… it means that americas food prices are ultra fucked

    https://links.coles.com.au/hRXTKkT7aVb

    Coles No Added Hormone Beef 3 Star Regular Mince: $7/500g (1lb ~= 450g)

    (at time of writing, that beef in the photo costs about $10AUD/500g, or our beef mince costs $4.50USD)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Noticed a similar thing going between Canadian and US grocery stores. Roughly the same numerical cost, but with the difference in price exchange rates it is far cheaper on the Canadian side. Also, high fructose corn syrup isn’t at the top of every single ingredient list.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    I hear about high food prices all the time, it's like 50% of what people complain about

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Saying this in response to a news story about rising food prices? The high food prices are still being talked about and are still a problem.

    The "The Resistance" logo in the top-right makes sense as only democrats could come up with a dumb line of attack as "food prices were never actually a problem and people were just being told to be angry about this non-problem". This is the same party that boasted about saving consumers 16 cents for the 4th of July: https://www.newsweek.com/white-house-boasts-cookouts-are-16-cents-cheaper-this-year-internet-isnt-impressed-1606210

    Almost as if they knew of how fucked the inflation would be and tried to run in front of it. That clearly didn't work, so they tried gaslighting everyone by claiming rising prices are a non-issue. If this is the resistance then we're fucked.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The problem is that before we all spoke of the issue. Now a large chunk of us speak nothing of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    The problem is that before we all spoke of the issue.

    The problem is that the biden administration pretended they solved the problem while it was still getting worse, after an administration whose first two years were spent breaking every promise to the left of joe manchin.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Possibly because you are a Xitter user, where 90% of the user base is bots.

  • source
  • In part because people got used to those prices rising. But mostly because the media couldn't generate clicks discussing it anymore.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Oh, man. I haven't thought about Ramit in years. He used to do a blog called "I will teach you to be rich" or something like that.

    Surprised he's not a Trump voter, to be honest.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    i miss when the cost of eggs was our biggest concern

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    because everyone knows and feels the slowly rising over-inflation, but there are far more pressing problems that need to be addressed

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    I think the main difference is that people were "apoplectic" when food prices had doubled or tripled in a year or two, and now they're only going up like 10%. But also because people get used to anything, and apparently one of the things they're used to right now is food being ridiculously expensive. Thirdly, most people get sick of a subject after a while so they engage less on it. Don't want another article, don't want another comment, they just turn it off and look at memes.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    When plant meat is at the same price or cheaper, I will.

    I've already worked out most of my recipes to use it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Or just don't eat meat and choose one of the plenty alternatives that's not faux-meat

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    A lot of vegan meals don't feel quite filling without some kind of protein. Seiten and mushrooms cooked the right way does it, so does impossible burger.

    But "lol just stay hungry" isn't a persuasive argument.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    It wasn't meant as a "stay-hungry gotcha". What I meant was that vegan meats are not a must when it comes to substituting meat. Food like Impossible Burgers and things like that. But there's tofu, tempeh, seitan as you've mentioned, beans, legumes, chickpeas... There's a lot to eat instead of (vegan) meat is what I meant to convey.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Last night I had half a container of peanuts. That was enough protein

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Its not about meeting caloric requirements for protein. If people felt completely satisfied after eating peanuts, people wouldnt waste all that money on meat. The impossible burger proves that its always been a matter of creating vegan meals that are satisfying to the people who eat meat.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    the average amount of red meat consumed a day on the earth per person is something like 2.2 ounces.

    seems like the price isn't high enough to make Americans recognize how a 1/4 pounder is twice that average in one item.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah that's dumb... Not everyone eats red meat everyday... Maybe try finding out how much someone eats during a meal on average... And how many people per day .. That's more informative...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment