To me it's still crazy why there are still so much rep voters. I get it when you're a billionaire, but why would normal people want their country to get fucked up even faster than is already happening, making their own lives even worse than they already are. I mean, I get it when you're lied to, but now they have seen with their own eyes how life became so much harder under rep leadership. Choosing for that is the dumbest thing I've ever seen. "I have trouble paying my bills and groceries. I want food to be less affordable and less available and I want to pay more to fill up my truck, and I want it yesterday!"
post
WTF Vermont
I want to fund Zelensky statues in places Trump likes. It's a complete waste of money but I want it anyway. He's been at war longer than any of those confederate shitheels we have statues of now.
Eh I'm of the opinion that erecting statues of people who are still alive, especially politicians, is a bad idea. Never know who will turn bad and when.
FWIW, the Ukraine-based designers of 3D-printable Zelensky models is legion, and they're either free or the funds go directly to supporting the people there!
If you don't have a printer, or know someone who does, oftentimes public libraries will —or maker spaces, gaming shop communities, high schools, colleges, etc.
Also, the cost in filament/resin is suuuper cheap (e.g. <5¢ to print a PC for D&D), so do tip/donate to the place/person you choose. 🤓
Zelensky must go (I'm ukrainian)
*who
Or *to whom
It’s “whom” either way, because the “to” is still there, it just comes at the end of the sentence, something which works perfectly fine in English and doesn’t hamper understanding at all.
Correct.
Even in the absence of "to", 'whom' is correct: Whom do I thank.....
Oh absolutely, because it’s the object, not the subject, but you do need the “to” for “say” to work well. We’ve basically only got a case system in English in pronouns and it feels a lot more confusing to people than it is.
Would you say “him?” Say “whom.”*
Would you say “he?” Say “who.”
*major exception: people like to use the objective case with “it is,” but that does not flow well with whom- you might call someone up and say “it’s me,” but “whom is it?” is going to hit a lot more people’s ears wrong. (Neither really makes sense for the objective case, but there are incomprehensible exceptions to normal case rules in other languages, I support English getting weird with it)
His talent in posing often in those akward expressions must be studied. Like the asshole mouth.

all 24 comments