all 65 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 70 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Time to start the investigations, Elon. Might want to clear your schedule and make sure all your records are up to date. 🤣

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    We're in a stalemate for two years. That's the best we could hope for, and that's what we got. Billionaires are safe and always will be, Dems like money and power too, and power corrupts no matter which color banner they stand under for elections.

    One way to mitigate corruption and cronyism is term limits for Congress.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 3 days ago

    One way to mitigate corruption and cronyism is term limits for Congress.

    I was with you all the way until this point. I'm still not quite sure why this conservative-coded idea is gaining ground elsewhere, but there is little evidence to support the idea that term limits would be good for progressives.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 49 points 3 days ago* (3 children)

    I just can't stop laughing. I'm not even lying.

    I am seeing that shit everywhere -- especially in all the battleground states he poured money into like water, such as Maine, Texas, and Michigan that are now winning historical upsets -- and I literally can't stop snickering and laughing.

    🤣 🤣 🤣

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Dude just finished moving all of his shit to Texas too. I hope the meltdown is epic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 days ago

    Epic indeed. Toddler billionaire thought he could buy the elections he wanted and it didn't work, and there are no refunds. Imagine the entitled fury.

    Oh god I can't stop laughing, I'm gonna wake up the whole house 🤣 🤣 🤣

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 3 days ago* (3 children)

    I'd glad to see it, but it's barely anything to him. Equivalent of ~$100 to an average US adult.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    I would say that although mathematically you are correct, the impact of losing $100 for the average American is greater.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 days ago

    I'm celebrating this result. It's not about the money, because as everyone else is saying, this is chump change to him.

    But what's beautiful is the blow to the ego. The reminder that all the money in the world can't buy popularity or adoration. The suspicion that he might be getting taken advantage of by others taking his money. The confirmation that he's not fully in control, and never will be.

    That is worth celebrating.

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 3 days ago (3 children)
  • [–] 17 points 3 days ago

    Hey, he turned Texas blue. Maybe he'll come to Oklahoma now and do it again.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    If i was in charge but couldn't make it illegal for people to donate money to political funds, I'd make it a requirement that for every single £ they donate, they must donate the same amount to charity.

    They dont pick the charity.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 days ago

    He can spare it and so can all the California billionaires who won't get taxed. I'm disappointed, but at least I have a nice big blue wave to cool my toes in.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 days ago

    I wonder if all the republican scumbags he bought looked at the money and thought "wait, why the fuck do I even need to bother being a politician? I can just take this imbecile's money, lose, and go on a paid vacation for a few years. I'll just call it a series of fact-finding missions in aid of the 2028 presidential election".

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 days ago

    Meh. He won't miss the money, he probably regrets not doubling it, if anything. Also, he knew he was gambling by the fact he spent them money in the first place. He didn't put in anything he couldn't easily afford to lose, which really should make we never-gonna-be-billionaires think a bit.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    The difference between $473 million and Elon Musk's total net worth is roughly a trillion dollars.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago

    At what point will these people realize that there is a point of diminishing returns in campaign spending, where simply throwing more money at it won't generate any more votes?

    Honestly, the only way all this outsized campaign money makes sense to me is if candidates are pocketing it as a back-door bribe. Maybe now that Texas is run by sane people, we'll get some good investigations into where all the money went.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    I know where we can cut a trillion from, it starts with S and ends in pacex+tesla+twitter.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago

    But don't worry. He can spare it.

    That's the part I worry about.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago

    Texas gave Musk the D, I am very proud of my state today.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago

    473 million is poop money to him

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago

    The ROI to defeat Prop 40 in California was definitely worth it.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago

    That's like $50 USD for him, he'll be fine

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 child)

    Isn't that like a week's groceries going bad because the fridge broke for him?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 4 points 3 days ago

    Probably even less. For most people, a fridge repair and losing a week's worth of groceries will break them.

    In any case, Musk will be just fine, financially. His ego is another matter.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/saving-money-emergency-expenses-2025/

    Whether it's a busted refrigerator, car trouble or medical issues, unexpected costs are a part of life. But even such routine curveballs often spell serious financial trouble for many Americans.

    That's according to a new Bankrate report that surveyed more than 1,000 U.S. adults about their ability to handle a surprise bill. Despite the country's current low unemployment rate, the annual study found that 59% of Americans in 2025 don't have enough savings to cover an unexpected $1,000 emergency expense.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago

    I love when they spend a fortune, and lose anyway. They're money isn't as powerful as they think it is.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago (2 children)

    Who regrets pennies? Musk doesnt see 473 million dollars. Hes a multibillionaire. He didnt even feel this monetarily.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    But he feels it politically. It's very likely that some of the Rs going down in flames were because of his donations, not in spite of.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    Someone in a other chain pointed out its the stock hits and lose of his image as an insider that will cost him the most because of this and I can get slight satisfaction from that. But these people all need to be made mortal.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago (9 children)

    That's chump change for him. He's a trillionaire. Your millions mean nothing to him.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago

    Hes spent this cash because he wants to avoid the Democrats coming after him and his businesses. Hes been lumping everything under the SpaceX banner because NASA has been forced into depending on SpaceX so they absolutely have to be bailed out, and its a virtual certainty that they will need it. Republican controlled he can get the lot bailed out, Democrat there is a small sliver that they force the split of SpaceX from the crap and just save that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    He has a net worth of a trillion, it doesn't mean he has that sort of liquidity all the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    Can't he just pledge his stocks to the bank?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago (2 children)

    Kind of, but his stocks are most likely already leveraged, plus it does incur an interest. Plus, the loan has to actually be paid back in full.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -24 points 3 days ago (10 children)
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)
  • [–] 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    If you read their comment history, they are not a bootlicker. They come off more like a depressed californian who leans left.

    I think their comment was refering to the ballot initiatives in ca, the wealth tax and the two counter-measures that billioniares bought.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments