Hey wait a second. Why are you posting a video with a blurry Wolfsangel patch on some random background soldier's uniform? You literally said there are photos of Zelensky proudly posing with swastika flags. Those are the images you should be posting.

But okay. Wolfsangel. First, having that symbol in the background of a video and saying that makes the Ukrainian military white supremacist, well, that's a tenuous argument. According to them the Wolfsangel symbol is being used in its original historical context, ie, to symbolize rebellion and freedom from tyranny. The situation they're in certainly bears out that notion. I mean, what would be the point of promoting white supremacy in a war where virtually all the soldiers involved are white?

I'm sure you're aware most Nazi symbols were appropriated from elsewhere and turned into hateful imagery by association and a corrupting ideology. I agree with you that in a modern context it's problematic, but I stop short of calling their explanation outright bullshit. For you to unequivocally accuse them of Nazism, which echoes Russian propaganda, is suspect in itself.

Separately, if white supremacy in the armed forces genuinely bothers you, I have some truly distressing news about many service members in your own military. I hope you're as vocal (or more, even!) with your opposition to their service as you are to that of the Ukrainians. But somehow I doubt it.

source: Russia Today

evidence: blurry photo

No, I think it's outdated info. They definitely started out that way when they were an independent militia pre-2014, no argument here, but modern researchers and historians say that's no longer the case. The Kremlin disagrees, of course. I have no doubt there are still Neo-Nazis in there, but to say that makes it an openly Neo-Nazi battalion... there are Jews and Muslims fighting in that brigade too, if that means anything to you. I guess you'll just have to decide for yourself who's more credible, the defenders or the invaders.