all 66 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 85 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Anakin might be one of the better popular examples of how someone being failed from everyone around them, have their choices restricted and their will supressed, and that can lead their fall into fascist ideals.

He is born into slavery. He is rescued from slavery because he is told he is special. His mother is not special and so she is left behind and ultimately dies due to that. He lives with justified guilt and anger as a result.

The man that rescued him from slavery dies, leaving his reluctant protégé as his only real connection as a pseudo-big brother and mentor. He feels yet more loss and greif for this.

That mentor constantly places major expectations on him, telling him he is special and chosen, but also constantly criticizing his impulsivity and controlling him. He feels constrained.

He has a close association with power, but is always denied it himself even when he has contributed more than others. He feels betrayed and unappreciated.

He belongs to an order of people that tell him that all of these emotions and internal conflicts are wrong and dangerous. He feels dirty and hopeless.

He is told romantic love is off limits. He dalies in rule breaking, mainly in regard to that last rule. He loves a girl and she falls for him as well. The world doesn't implode. He starts to question the world view that was pushed on him since childhood.

A charismatic leader starts to give him attention, appreciation, and trust. He offers him power. He tells him that his feelings are not wrong, but strength. He tells him that he need not repress himself. He can seek that power, gain love, and ensure that he never loses anyone again. He questions everything for the first time and looks up to the man giving him this flattery and ideas of grandeur.

Then those in his order, specifically the one that most directly denied him the approval he sought and earned, tell him that this charasmatic man is evil, that his ideas that made him feel good about himself are wrong, and they attack this man. He is forced to make a choice between a highly moralistic, often hypocritical, and restrictive ideal, and the first taste of appreciation and power he has ever felt in his life. And on the spot, it is no wonder he chooses the latter.

It is obviously dramatized and he takes a real hard swing real fast with the immediate genocide of his entire order, including children, but... other than that, it is pretty realistic.

If Anakin had felt more accomplished and appreciated, less controlled, and free to love and live a happy peaceful life with his wife and kids, he would have been far less susceptible to the silver tongued fascist and probably wouldn't have made such a turn.

I am not sure how to fix this in the real world at any real scale, but to make sure everyone feels more appreciated, secure, and free. I'm certainly not justifying fascism or fascists' fall, btw. I'm just being realistic and seeking solutions to address it. I do think it becomes easier to fall for fascist messaging when the society, economy, and community are not healthy and supportive of all in it. But on a more micro-scale, I think all you can do is make fascism the less appealing choice for the individual. Make those at risk or on the brink feel loved and appreciated, even if you are very concerned by the beliefs they have started to take on and share. Make your boys and men feel loved and tie that feedback to simply being good people. Yes, I am saying to be less judgemental and give people a cookie for doing the bare minimum. It only costs you a metaphorical cookie and it may just buy you one less fascist.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 week ago

    I’ve always felt sexual repression is an important part of fascist playbooks but couldn’t explain why. This writeup is great for that.

    Also, in Jedi: Survivor, after Order 66, Cal Kestis abandons the Jedi ideals and takes on a girlfriend. It’s pretty satisfying.

    Lategame spoilersThere’s also a lategame struggle against the Dark Side. It becomes your L3+R3 super mode, and Cal openly admits he wants his friends to hold him back from using it too much. Could be a bit of a statement on using violence and anger in extreme scenarios, more than just “100% nonconfrontational pacifism all the time”.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago

    Make those at risk or on the brink feel loved and appreciated, even if you are very concerned by the beliefs they have started to take on and share. Make your boys and men feel loved and tie that feedback to simply being good people. Yes, I am saying to be less judgemental and give people a cookie for doing the bare minimum.

    YMMV, but this was one of the things that turned me around.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago*

    And the Jedi Order tried to deny him training, which would’ve been best because once he received that training, he was a walking weapon with or without guidance. But the reality is… hypothetically, you’d think that much “midichlorians” would still have awakened with some sense to the Force. And if either Sith or Jedi can sense a “new player” in its web, then he was doomed either way. I guess he fulfilled his plot set by his author so he won something there.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 82 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Face-eating leopard victim:

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 1 week ago (6 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    I just realized his name can be rearranged to "Smol Enuk" which might or might not be Afrikaans for "little person without balls"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago
    [–] 25 points 1 week ago* (15 children)

    I went normie > libertarian > liberal > socialist > anarchist. I've been on a journey. In a sense my viewpoint now is a synthesis of my initial instincts and what I learned since. Thesis: libertarian, antithesis: socialist, synthesis: anarchist.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Same. The branching point was libertarian, or discovering that they just meant they wanted to replace government with corporations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    I came close to getting sucked into libertarianism back in college. I had a roommate who was college libertarian, and he had a whole friend group that were pretty libertarian. And he was working for the Kinky Friedman campaign so our apartment was filled with Kinky for Texas governor signs. Who didn't love Kinky Friedman? Especially with the other options.

    But the more and more we talked with each other the more and more I started thinking hey this is kind of fucking crazy. One of them was convinced that we should get rid of the US Military and replace them with Mercenaries. Mercenaries. Cuz that's always a great concept. That always works well for a country. Slightly unrelated but another one of them said that the Postal Service, the band which I think has had to change it's name, was better than Michael Jackson's music. So clearly they were all out of their minds. And I pulled away.

    I think most of them grew out of it too thankfully.

  • source
  • parent
  • I was fortunate enough to have a classmate foist his copy of The Fountainhead on me when I was 17. Only got as far as the "rape is fine, actually" part, but hated it so much I skipped the whole libertarian phase and went straight to socialism. Thank you, Dana, you have terrible taste.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    Imma be real this "LiBeRtArIaNs" bullshit is new, misguided, and region specific, and even within that region is debatable.

    Small "L" (goddamn sans serif fonts) "libertarian" is literally just the diametric opposition if "authoritarian." That's it.

    "Big L" "Libertarian" for some reason has come to mean The American Libertarian Party™ specifically. "They've been taken over by the right" maybe, sure, but they can't have the entire concept of libertarianism no more than the US Democrat party is the entire embodiment of democracy, they're named after those concepts but those concepts still exist without the bounds of the US party and the whims of said US parties' current leaders. Even if the Libertarian Party™ happened to perfectly align with your views on what "liberatarian" (as in the antithesis of authoritarian) means at any point in the future, they still don't have ownership of the concept simply because they're named that.

    In reality, "libertarian" describes any number of people and ideologies as long as they're anti-authoritarian, including anarchism, and just like anarchism you can find many examples of people who claim it but do not understand it in the slightest, or seek to pervert it to their will intentionally.

    Don't let authoritarians poison you against a word for a concept in an attempt to sway you to their side.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    I understand your point, but it's a losing battle. Words change as people use them. Language evolves. A lot of modern vocabulary is bastardized from its origin. It's not authoritarians necessarily poisoning language, even though it can be.

    Socialism "was" a poisoned term, that I think has slowly returned to it's meaning.

    Example: Nice

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (3 children)

    If that's the case than literally now literally always means "figuratively."

    And sometimes, it does, when used incorrectly or sarcastically, but that doesn't mean that the literal definition of "literally" is no more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    That would mean the concept of "literality" no longer exists, but you just used it, (I'm taking your words literally, to mean that you believe "literal" now means "figurative" in perpetuity) so it must still exist. I also just used it, so even if you meant "literally" figuratively, the literal definition still exists, because I just used it.

    You see why we can't just say "oh welp words change" now? They do but also if nothing has meaning just stop speaking languages at this point because they're, well, meaningless.

    Hell I'll give you another popular example, you ever watched South Park? You remember the biker episode? They argue the same thing you do here, that words change meaning, but about a different word (and with a better case for it, no less). You wanna defend the evolved use of that word publicly here right now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    My god, I was being facetious in that last comment. I was merely highlighting that your frustration was not going to change the course of people's use of language.

    I'm not arguing that definitions are meaningless.

    Chill.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Kinda similar. Went from liberal, to socdem, to anarchist, to Marxist-Leninist. My growth since becoming an ML has been in getting a deeper understanding of scientific socialism, as well as getting organized and putting theory to practice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    You might find Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars(Red, Green, Blue) series of books interesting. In them he details a completely different economic system where corporations do not exist. It was fascinating and I would have been happy to read an entire book just about the economic and political ideas he expressed in the Mars books.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I was on the path to being a far right ethno-fascist CHUD because of how I was treated at large by the local bit of society I grew up in. Thank god I went to college at all, it started me reading and understanding politics and how we got where we are today. I started shifting left pretty hard when Obama was elected, saw the Tea Party for what it was, and seeing the "field" of GOP candidates and hell even Democrat ones.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago

    Average Manosphere pipeline

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    Libertarians are as bad or worse than the stereotypical lazy naive communist. Almost certainly worst for what they enable.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    Wait, you mean to tell me the "fuck you, got mine" ideology is worse than the "sharing is caring" ideology? Hot take.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    They haven’t even got theirs, they just think they would if there were no laws.

    When you press them they always suggest they’ll live in a commune like community but with perfect capitalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    The "stereotypical lazy naive communist" isn't really a thing, outside of stereotypes. Communists tend to be some of the most involved and aware members of the working class.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    If fascist is my final form, please God just take me now…

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    Uh, at what age was he personally murdering innocent people? I think this change happened a LOT earlier.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Thought I was in the political memes comm. Shocked to learn this was posted in Progressive Politics....

    But the progress depicted is from slavery to fascism

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    I never stopped being libertarian. I just started asking why freeloaders get tax-funded thugs to protect their stolen land, and agreed that workers have freedom of association.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago
    [–] 0 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    yeah, abducting minors, and indoctrinating them, does that to anyone.

    Curing fascism once it gets to a certain zeitgeist is only a genocide or two until the masses awaken, if at all.

    Funny the Jedi order are modern Zionists.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (3 children)

    Buddhist monks are Zionist? Fuck you

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    First time I read Buddhists carry swords, manipulate minds, and move objects to achieve enlightenment🙃
    Do you perhaps confuse Daoist with warlocks too?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    AI? The faces don't look like the actors

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    I'm pretty sure it's not AI generated. https://9gag.com/gag/aL0Gq7z here it is on 9gag from 2020, where you can see a handle for Craig Stirling. Looks like Craig posted this image on facebook back around May of 2020, which is probably close to the time it was originally created.

    I knew I saw it a few years ago, but it can be so hard to find old images. Also, probably the best version is over on reddit, but it's a little less political.

    Edit: I really shouldn't try to speak to this image. I just knew I saw basically the same thing before, this particular iteration could be AI considering it doesn't really look like Craig Stirling's.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    I uhh, guess. I'm not really seeing the metaphore here, and this isn't a meme community unless I'm mistaken.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment