all 45 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 115 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What a fucking stupid idea.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    It would only be good if it was a tax that would force websites to be simple like the 90s to reduce all the garbage data a website loads nowadays.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 89 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

    Please stop reposting this fake news.

    This was "passed" by 10 socialists, out of a 577-person council, who held an essentially secret vote to guarantee the proposal was "approved." This is a political trick. No one supports this. It will not pass.

    In the U.S. this would be like if the 3 representatives from Wyoming and the Dakotas had a slumber party and the "caucus" decided to push a bill that required all children in the country to read the bible before going to bed, and then everyone on the internet started saying "U.S. lawmakers approve bill to force children to read the bible!!!" There's a ridiculous amount of information being intentionally left out of that headline to get you to click it, and to encourage lazy "I only read the headline" and updoot farmers like the OP to repost it.

    Here is an article that actually explains this, not some dried up old internet message board desperate for clicks. https://tech-insider.org/french-lawmakers-per-gigabyte-internet-traffic-tax-11-10-vote-2026/

    PROTIP: If something on the internet outrages you or seems completely insane, it's probably fake. Spend 10 seconds in Google before freaking out in comments and being an easily manipulated rube.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    This will just result in more companies blocking France.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    That would be kinda insane. It would be $12 just to download gta 6😂

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 week ago

    French lawmakers seem to enjoy causing riots.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    There certainly wont be a way to tanper with this, right? Like nobody would maliciously start to load content from a platform now just to increase their bill.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    It's basically an internet shutdown disguised as a tax. If it applied only to GAFAM I would support it, let's get them out of the market

  • source
  • [–] [S] 54 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    France looked at internet connections people already pay for and thought: what if we taxed the contents too? Apparently the only thing that should be unlimited is the government’s appetite for new revenue. And somehow they’re surprised when people suggest the bill will end up with consumers.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    It would be making the companies pay for their delivery of content, so not a direct payment by the customer. Companies play to play for access to French citizens. How the companies deal with that is hugely variable, but think of this as a step towards wealth tax.

    Also France desperately needs more revenue as it is nearing a debt crisis on it's own, which might be some of what is behind this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    France has approved a proposed tax that aims to tax the amount of internet data per gigabyte sent to French users in the country, with major companies like Google, Netflix, TikTok, and Meta now in the crosshairs. According to minutes released by the National Assembly, members voted 11-10 in support of the motion on October 30 — which now means the new law has been added to the country’s next budget, despite major opposition from the government side and the finance committee rapporteur. The law still has to pass through the Senate for final approval. The latest amendment, introduced by socialist lawmaker Laurent Lhardit, could see content providers pay €0.055 (roughly $0.06) to the government for every gigabyte of content distributed to French users.

    So not the end user directly, but the companies who deliver the content. Like a fee to access France's users, pay to play.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 42 points 1 week ago (10 children)

    It's a proposed law... like most laws, it will almost certainly die along the way, or be altered to irrelevance.

    Think through this for a hot second about how such a law could affect EU internal trade and complicate external trade. Of course it will die.

    Stop hyperventilating.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    i mean france has passed similarly draconian taxes before that caused riots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    "Draconian taxes" meanwhile France is in draconian debt.

    France will go bankrupt if they dont cut their government spending by a huge amount. But any proposal in that direction causes riots. So instead their government is just driving at full speed towards bankruptcy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    But they won't pass a billionaire tax either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (3 children)

    Billionaire Tax isn't even enough.

    The problem is that all the boomers are retiring and demographically and economically that's just impossible to keep up with. Their government has the highest debt of Europe, but meanwhile the lowest retiring age of all and a huge bureaucracy. 1 in 3 French people work for the government. It is just not possible, no matter who or how much you tax people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (2 children)

    My point is that it's ridiculous to propose a regressive tax on internet when the zucman tax was voted down earlier this year

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    Lemmy's pretty good about getting to the meat of a thing, but other platforms will breathlessly report a proposed law by a freshmen state congressmen as a done deal. Some dude's been in his state's congress for a few months, proposes some bullshit to get his name in the news, and it works every damned time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago*

    Couldn't this be abused? What's stopping me from using a VPN node in France and downloading terabytes from google, meta, etc.? But I guess they will start capping traffic to French addresses.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    This makes no bloody sense. Either the pipe is in use, or it isn't. The "water" itself is infinite, so long as the device on the other end has electricity. I assume people in France already pay their electric bill.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Air fiber, nodes of wifi that dont follow power regulations. This may birth the next internet?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I don’t support doing this legislatively, but there should be a greater incentive to optimize storage size and bandwidth. Broadband has made us far too comfortable with unnecessarily large files and inefficient compression.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    frenchy budget is pretty fucked. they do be needing more revenue.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (2 children)

    I fear for the day that France goes bankrupt and the EU goes down with them… The Netherlands has been so strict with its budgeting and it would all go to waste thanks to France.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments