I dislike anyone implying they know what is best for me on any topic if they are not a professional, having children often makes people they are an expert for some reason
post
There's people that should have been child free. Like whoever made sam altman, jeff bozo, and muskrat for example.
Considering most kids I see out in the wild, my guess is that most parents shouldn’t be parents. Today I saw a kid running across restaurant tables as his parents did what parents do. Aww, how cuuuute.
I'm a bit bothered by that. Maybe I have a different perspective, but can we just sit quietly? It was funny when I was in Japan and I thought, hey kids don't go on a conversation on the train...
I think the probpem is that tthere are too many parents out there that tdont know WHEN to let their child just be a child. Instead too many parents reward their child when their child does childish things everywhere and anywhere when instead thes epareents should only be allowing their child to do childish things at an open space that is made to allowing children to do this type of experimentation like a playdium or a park or a gymnastics practice or a forest or jungle gym.... NOT in a restaurant.
I remmember having this one talk with a kindergarten teacher and theteacher was calm as a tranquilized cucumber despite seeing kids flyingn all oover the class room. SHe basically said that since children aree born not knowinng the physics or the 'rules' of ouur society, a society with rules that were crafted by adults , its basically like the children were born into a video game in 'sandbox mode'. The kids are just trying to unerstand what are ethe limits of, the rules, their bodies, or of the limitss of the physics of this world are at all times. The kids are basically 'testing EVERYTHING' all the time.
And now take that example of the kid running across the restaurant table and the parents saying 'Aww'. The parents in that situation were correct in letting their child 'test' out what it was running accross, but the parents were wrong in allowing. the child to conduct that test in the miiddle of the restaurant on a table. Had those parents taken their kiids first out to the playground to 'test' out what running on the 'tables' at the playground was slike and to burn off their energy then the child probablt wouldnt have had ran across that table. If that child had slipped on something oily or watery on the table and gotten injured ...weell.....
I think the major aspect is to function in society. Maybe there would be less Karens or whatever. Playing on the street with your friends is one thing, but in a room full of other people is a bit different. The one thing about teachers part that you mentioned, as I was an educator for a bit, you don't put your hands on someone's kid. High risk, no reward. You can only use your voice really, and I mean yelling. The restraint techniques require two educators, mostly for legal reasons, and well it's funny that they're military style ones; of course there's emergency ones and it's too risky.
I get a fair bit of jealousy because I have three money and no kids
But that's not why I didn't breed
I just don't like kids and had no desire to be a parent
Everything else is merely a bonus, not a reason
It's telling when breeders immediately seize on my lifestyle as a reason to criticise me
Jealous losers
Lmfao I never thought I’d see that username outside of the Digg revival attempt.
Agreed on your comment though. I don’t want them and everything that comes with that decision is a bonus not a reason.
Op over there like, "I can't have kids it would ruin my "preferred lifestyle" " then complaining when people comment on their lifestyle.
When have I complained about people commenting?
They can be jealous, I couldn't care less
"What is this nonsense!? You, FistingEnthusiast - an adult who has their own independent life , have reproductive rights and youve decided to use those reproductive rights to.... NOT reproduce!? GASP! hOw dArE yoU!?¿¡1 Your decision to not breed is ruining MY life!!!"
Im guessing thats how some of those arguments went ? lol
The most common response is "that's selfish"
- said by the same people who unironically ask, "iF yOu dON't hAve KidS, wHo'LL tAKe cArE oF yoU wHen yOU'rE oLd?!"
never having kids myself but its kinda mean to lump all parents together
responably having 1-2 kids isnt on the same level as popping out a bakers dozen
Aye if youre oit here having kids when the option to adopt is present and available then you might as well see yourself as being a 'bakers dozen breeder'
There are dozens of kids to adopt in every country on the planet. ALL these children are worthy of parents' love. And the fact that most of humanity has put up so many hurdles to make adoption occur and would only care for a child if it shares DNA with them further convicts humanity about our lack of our care for the most important beings of human society .
Indeed!
I feel too many parents act as if childfree people wouldnt know UNLESS we had kids ..... but these same parents fail to realize that some of us have been babysitters, and EC educators, and have seen what destructive and nonsensical things kids do in private and obviously do in public and have decidd that we just dont want them cause of these experiences and witnessings lol.
Also I don't understand why parent and child thing still have reference to outdated previous era or time where a family need to survive by tribal rules, which usually ends with conflict or crime which clearly recorded in history.
All that knowledge and public still insist having children is better than not.
all 35 comments