Oh, I am not surprised about that. Ubisoft were never really known for respecting their customers.

Finally seeing them complaining, it was weird that they were so quiet.

Wasn't their driving game a big factor in the campaign in the first place? Guy's out of touch to say the least

I don't care what this guy has to say. I'm not even going to click on that link because it'll just make me angry. Fuck off, Yves. Get your own house in order.

He should probably concentrate making games people want to play instead. Ubisoft is down the drain.

The Stop Killing Games demands are not hard to meet, unless you’re a greedy little shitgoblin.

During the last sale recently I was looking for an open world racing sim. Ended up getting Forza Horizons 5 over Ubisoft's The Crew 2 because they killed off and removed my copy of The Crew from my library, so they can get fucked.

Truly so shocked. Anyway, pretty obvious since the biggest reason these companies refuse to even release the server component (as opposed to making the game playable offline) is that they can then either "remaster" the game and release it again in like a decade or just release it again with maybe a couple features added and call it v2.0.

The ceo is a massive clown!

And then we kill Ubisoft. Murder by no purchases.

Incredible that they got over 1 million signatures, and this shooting target gets just as much of a say.

Ironically, I think Ubisoft has a good example of a multiplayer game with a good end-of-life despite not reaching its sales expectations with BattleCore Arena, where the last update allowed P2P play after the servers went down. Meaning that the game wasn't totally killed off, even if it was thought as yet another service game, which is always appreciated.

That said, given the lack of marketing that was done around the game, it was perhaps a "not too expensive game that could maybe work on a fluke", where Ubisoft's lack of attention potentially left the devs quite free with their game. Devs who thankfully respected their players and made good end-of-life decisions.

Luigi

He's so old. No wonder Ubisoft is so close to bankrupcy.

Goat fights back against banning-goats-from-gardener-jobs.

Why tf should anyone play the games if the CEO looks like some old rich white greedy parasite? Fuck him and Ubisoft. I was already boycotting their cookie cutter, external launcher, account needed, crashing, microtransaction bullshit enshitification anyways.

If I understand it correctly ubi was the company that was the straw that triggered the pettition. That has to sting

He should put his energy instead to making games work on Linux to increase the profit potential.

Repeat after me: Unsupported is fine. Remotely disabled is not fine.

Ubisoft is the first company that comes to mind when I worry about games going offline.

I've talked about it before, but I have something like $2k sunk into Rocksmith 2014 and associated peripherals. I'm not aware of any other game like it for bass guitar, and the new service model of Rocksmith looks like AI shit.

If / when they take down the servers is going to be a very sad day for me.

Thats a good sign, sign the petition if you can

”support can’t last forever.”

True, and it costs money to operate. You know how to fix that? Just release the source code of the server software, idiot.

Oh a CEO? Of a company that makes a franchise where characters go around assassinating the unjust?

Nah I'm just imagiluiging things.

What an old dude. No wonder Ubisoft doesn't get gamers

Ubisoft's CEO can suck it.

Good. Let's make it known exactly who is trying to steal away consumer rights. Make their names and faces known to everyone. Make it known they can't win. That they can't take back what has already been sold.

Haven't read this much bullshit coming from somebody for a while now.