all 86 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 181 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (18 children)

pilot phase with 38 ministry employees kicked off last year to trial Collabora's suite with Office documents. However, this trial was terminated when elections took place earlier this year. A spokesperson confirmed that the experiment had concluded, and would not resume again. They also confirmed that no evaluation benchmarking Collabora's performance against Microsoft Office had taken place either.

So it was a performance more or less, without any plan to actually switch.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 84 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

    When elections took place could mean someone that won was pro America or Microsoft

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

    There was no real change of power, Denmark is still ruled by their xenophobic self-declared social democrats busy teaming up with Italian post-fascists to undermine international rule of law. While there is little meaningful difference between Mette Fredriksen and Georgia Meloni she's pretty much as left as Danish politics goes, the only parties left of this mess (the Ø and Å lists, not kidding) are marginal and have never had real power.

    Traditionally Denmark has had no political line for themselves, and have followed America completely. They are completely new to trying to think original thoughts in terms of foreign policy, and we should expect to see them stumble a bit. I guess it's refreshing to see them pretend to try.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    Kind of hard words like xenophobic, fascist for parties democratically voted for by the majority of voters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 weeks ago*

    Georgia Meloni represents Fratelli d'Italia, the successor party of the Alleanza Nazionale, which in turn is the successor of the Movimento Sociale Italiano, which was Mussolini's party. The succession is direct enough that Fratelli d'Italia still uses the same logo as MSI; a tricolor flame.

    See if you can spot the similarity:

    If anything I was being generous to Georgia Meloni by referring to her party as post-fascist rather than straight out fascist. There is a clear continuation here. This is not a matter of opinion.

    As for the Social Democrats in Denmark being xenophobic, there's ample evidence. The fact that they would introduce ghetto laws to get rid of immigrant neighbourhoods - and even call them ghetto laws themselves - is one interesting high-profile example.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    It is kinda true though, we just call it something else. And fascism is on the rise here, along with xenophobia. We were always among the first to join the USA in wars while suppressing any questions from critics in the process.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

    It specifically says that performance wasn’t benchmarked.

    The root cause is incompatibility with Microsoft’s proprietary document format causing fuckiness for LibreOffice based Collabora. E.g. formatting issues.

    They could’ve tried the Russian alternative but I guess they’d prefer to gargle Microsoft’s fetid cock some more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Doesnt Office export to .odt too? Was any IT savy person involved in this?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago

    It does export to odt, but it still messes up document formatting. Of course this is a solvable issue from a technical perspective, but it's still a lot of man hours to do so for every single document and template across an entire government.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    The format isn't the problem; the rules for rendering content outside the PDF are more suggestions.

    And honestly, even if the rules were adhered to, there's no way in F that Microsoft would comply just for this very reason

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    the Russian alternative

    You say that like it's not simply swapping which one you have in your mouth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago*

    It isn't the same thing, no. The Russian alternative got forked by some EU corporation and relabeled to Euro Office. Further, it's FOSS, so it can be truly independently audited unlike Microslop's garbage.

    I will urge LibreOffice/Collabora any day. I don't really care for the Russian BS suite because it still adheres to Microsoft's proprietary "open" document standards, and so long as you use that bullshit you'll never own your own documents. You'll always be beholden to their garbage one way or another.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago*

    They also confirmed that no evaluation benchmarking Collabora’s performance against Microsoft Office had taken place either.

    So it was a performance more or less, without any plan to actually switch.

    Nope. There's was no evaluation. No reason to assume this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 139 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    sounds like they didn't try very hard

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago

    A big org, all at once, will almost always fail.

    Those IT departments aren't scoped to change the world all at once, and, on the receiving end, government workers generally aren't a class of people who respond well to large changes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 65 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)
  • [–] 49 points 2 weeks ago

    Denmark has abandoned plans to ditch technical problems

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 2 weeks ago

    It seems they tried to ditch Microsoft Office but to keep docx. What they need to do is to ditch docx first and start using open document format, then let the software follow.

    I don't think that's very likely as nobody seem to understand what file formats are or why they matter. So the second best option is probably to wait for Euro-Office to hopefully take off, and then hopefully Euro-Office can change default to ODT at some point in the future and we can finally get rid of docx once and for all.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 2 weeks ago

    They're getting threatened by the US and they can't even change a word processor, lol good luck to them

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 2 weeks ago* (2 children)

    Back in 2025, the government of Denmark announced that it is ditching Windows and Microsoft Office in favor of open-source alternatives like Linux.

    Denmark's reasoning was that it wants to reduce reliance on a U.S. vendor like Microsoft and also not be at the mercy of a volatile Trump administration. Now, it appears that the country has failed in its ambitious endeavor.

    Adoption of this European software would have been an important step in Denmark's bid for technological independence from software made by a U.S. firm.

    A pilot phase with 38 ministry employees kicked off last year to trial Collabora's suite with Office documents. However, this trial was terminated when elections took place earlier this year. A spokesperson confirmed that the experiment had concluded, and would not resume again. They also confirmed that no evaluation benchmarking Collabora's performance against Microsoft Office had taken place either.

    Microsoft must have truly been shitting it. 38 whole people trying out other software.

    I mean how hard would it have been for Microsoft to just pay a few of those 38 if any of them had been taking it seriously to begin with.

    No benchmarking, and the attempt at switching ended with the elections.

    Could it even have been called an attempt?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    Microsoft must have truly been shitting it. 38 whole people trying out other software

    That's not the point, the problem for Microsoft is that when people begin to realize we don't need Microsoft products because open source solutions work, it will spread like fire.

    The attempt was however half assed, and Microsoft never really needed to worry.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago*

    People do already realise that we don't need Microsoft products.

    The attempt was however half assed, and Microsoft never really needed to worry.

    That's my point.

    "Attempting" to ditch Microsoft by relying on 38 people to decide they should use any other product is nonsense. Even if we knew more about the 38 people. How long they tried it for, what other software did they try etc..

    It would be very easy for Microsoft to have just paid a fair few of them pennies, for them to say "let's give up".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 2 weeks ago* (3 children)

    One thing I hate, but came to understand about governments and big companies, - is that they only leave stuff if it starts falling apart under them due to lack of support and growing incompatibilities.

    Because otherwise the "technical problems" in the title can possibly be one Excel spreadsheet that turned out to not be bug-to-bug compatible when opened in LO.

    And now I've read the article, and with the exception of Collabora instead of LO, this is even dumber, they've cancelled the pilot due to "formatting issues". Even after looking a bit at big companies I think they are f-ng parasites and should have somehow gotten used to those "blank pages", thank you very much.

    That's an excuse. I say continue the pilot, and fire the focus group of 38 lazy ministerial jerks.

    But OK, I'm not a Danish citizen, so please be my guest, you hypothetical Danish citizen reading this, to borrow my opinion.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Used to work IT at a university during the transition time from Win 3.11 to Win95. The amount of emotional hand-holding (not even so much technical support) involved in getting the admin staff through the process was unbelievable to me at my young age. Now I understand, but back then I was expecting way more "this doesn't work" or "I can't find this program" and way less "I don't know how I'm going to do my job."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Cause the way UIs look when you want to do a job are discarded as "by programmers for programmers and not normal people", and UIs making an illusion of things working by themselves by intuition of the user and hiding specific actions are considered "user-friendly".

    UIs intended for people to do their jobs look, as an extreme, like ed . Less extreme - WordPerfect. XEphem, XGrace, Lisp environments. Those are what you come up with when you want a kiosk, but with a clear idea of a workplace supported by it, or an expert workplace where you do a job.

    While things like MSO, Telegram, today's web browsers, and so on - they are intended for people who don't want specifics. They want the illusion of fuzziness of what they are doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 49 points 2 weeks ago

    They got the call.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Doing these things is not easy and they take a lot of time and effort. But from a short look at the article it seems that there were issues with expectations:

    the officials were running into formatting issues such as blank pages when opening Office documents in Collabora and vice versa

    Like what do you expect when using an ODF first tool for OpenXML (Microsoft Office) documents? Euro-Office would be a better fit, from my ONLYOFFICE experience. It's not perfect but it's the more drop-in solution for their use case. It's sad that this has come to an end because of what a good, experienced Linux user could tell them even before they began.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago

    I see this all the damned time. Some people are obsessed with pages breaking at a heading or figure so they insert manual page breaks all over the damned place.

    Even the slightest font kerning difference and you end up with blank or mostly blank page when some manual page break gets pushed to the next page.

    Delete the manual page break that never should have been there? Nah, just cancel everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • It's always going to be a band-aid ripping moment, switching from MS Office to anything else.

    When I switched to Linux on my personal setups, it was at a time when Windows and Office were so different to what I was used to, I'd have to retool and retrain anyway. From what I hear from some of my white collar acquaintances, that's basically coming. I've been hearing things like "I wrote this spreadsheet 20 years ago, it's worked fine for decades, and now it's breaking because they're disabling VBA and it can't run from OneDrive." So I think we're going to enter an era when all the things that probably shouldn't have been implemented in Excel are gonna stop working.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 2 weeks ago

    This is borderline fake news. This pilot project was launched poorly by the ministry responsible for digitisation because the minister wanted his own project running so he could bash other ministries for not doing anything. It’s ironic, like rain on your wedding day.

    There are multiple pilot projects across the Danish range of ministries. Many are in much better shape because they’ve actually been thought through: example

  • source
  • [–] 46 points 2 weeks ago

    Ffs, ignorance and laziness aren't excuses.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Did MS offer them a huge deal?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

    I don't have much experience with Collabora but what I have wasn't great. I'm very much in favour of governments ditching MS for something like Libre Office. But I also know that the formatting errors can be a pain in the røv especially if you have 20 year old Excel sheets full of important information spiked with macros that civil servants who have long since retired made ages ago. It's minefields within minefields.

    So I think many things can be true at the same time. Denmark would like to rely less on American software and services. It was in the interest of the government to communicate that loudly at a time when the mad orange hand was reaching for Greenland (and may do so again because what's in a treaty?). The Collabora trial could have been an earnest effort that failed for many reasons I don't have trouble imagining. Or it was a show piece, a signal to the Danish voters as well as American companies. Your contacts may not be as certain any more. It may have led to some increased MS lobbying bts. And this doesn't mean this is the end of the effort. Just this one, at this point in time.

    The big problem is this: success stories of governments switching to something open source are rare. You don't win elections when people are fed up with long processing times in government services. They'd have to be sufficiently pissed off with the mad orange to tolerate that out of spite. And with the urgency of the Greenland crisis having subsided, the level of pissedoffness will have also declined.

    👍 1
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I would put some money on it either being.

    1: Some senior bod didn't like that they had to learn where one new button was, and threw their toys out of the pram. 2: The macros thing you mentioned. So many of these were done back in the day, VBA code that no-one knew about until they tried to open the sheet in another office package and it exploded.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    That last paragraph is interesting because in my opinion; Europe has been supporting the US, so they have no room to talk. I got tired of the why don't you protest bullshit. It's because you paid for it, with every arms, apple, google, amd, nvidia, intel, microsolp, etc purchase that the US made. This isn't a popular opinion but it should be recognized that you're indirectly paying in as well.

    Open software should be pursued.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    There is this idea in international politics that the rest of the world should have a say in US elections. Because the outcome inevitably affects us all outside the US. Since we don't have a say, we still rely on you to be the instrument of checks and balances on your government. And when it is as erratic and boneheaded as your current one, no amount of trade we do with the US should abrogate your responsibilities as the aforementioned instrument. Nor do I think we should stop encouraging protest against the dumb policy of tariffs, which is hurting your own economy as well. Or the end of Roe v Wade. Or the illegal kidnapping of a not much liked head of state. Or the illegal war in Iran. And while this is not exactly the example to follow, the French are rioting for much less these days. It started with bad conditions in schools.

    Capitalism works very much with countries' economies complementing each other. You have the IT sector, high tech military companies, and whisky. Europe has luxury brands, wine, and various niche industries. You buy our shit and we buy yours and then there is no need to produce your shit here as well and vice versa.

    That's a result of decades of a transatlantic relationship that worked in everybody's favour. We invest in your economy and get security guarantees in return. It's in a way an extended payoff of the Marshall plan. Your tech sector would be much worse if Europe had built up parallel infrastructures. Which nobody thought necessary because we were all friends. And especially arms deals are often decades in the making. So this "you buy our slop and guns so stop telling us to protest our idiotic government" doesn't sound quite right to my ears. I think that's too easy an out.

    Rest assured though that Europe will be spending less of its money in the US. The loss of trust as a result of 45/47 is nearly instant. Rebuilding it will take more than a couple of saner administrations. Meanwhile, the US's purchasing power is shrinking too. Europeans buy military equipment in South Korea and Canada looks to the EU for closer ties. And we haven't even talked about the bubble yet.

    It's surprising really that you aren't protesting more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    There are no checks and balances. And per example, what would happen if all tech industries pulled the plug on Europe?--that could happen, look at starlink.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    US tech industry hurt itself in confusion

    US Big Tech is loyal, first and foremost, to mammon. Pulling out of a single war torn country isn't so bad. Pulling out of a rich and highly developed market, with over half a billion consumers, and many globally leading corporations, that will hurt in a different way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Believe it or not these methods are already available and good thing no one told the orange man he can do it. And as in the news you can clearly see no fucks given when it comes to things like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    100% it was a hot dumpster fire of a Sharepoint deployment that made it impossible to migrate.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago

    Microsoft's specification has previously caused problems for other vendors like LibreOffice's The Document Foundation (TDF) too. There is some controversial history behind this feud between the two formats

    No, there was no feud. What happened is that when Microsoft had to create an open document format that everyone could use, they purposefully made their format impossible to implement by anyone. IIRC, The open doc forma spec does it all and is 1500 pages large, whereas the Microsoft format doc is well over 6000 pages long and contains closed parts still anyways.

    This is just standard Microsoft strategy and it worked again and dumb fucks again decided to stay married to Microsoft Microsoft because at apparently they love being abused

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    So TDF has a fascinating article on their blog discussing how the Austrian military made the switch. It took a lot of planning and there was a huge amount of work to help move people along.

    I suspect this may not have been the case here. But I’m sure we’ll find out the gory details soon enough

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 2 weeks ago

    I swear I have been reading this article for 20 years. Some gov org balks at Microsoft cost and pitches free alternative. They dont plan on spending extra to complete the transition and then dont adequately train or build out the infrastructure.

    Replacing an intrenched system with a free software alternative successfully will require more money in the first few years, not less.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 2 weeks ago

    Yeah, this is how monopolistic digital companies operate. Every time you try and pivot from their bullshit “ecosystem” you encounter “technical difficulties” because they’ve surreptitiously extended their tentacles beyond their products. Getting off of these systems will take a concentrated effort and it’s unfortunate that governments just aren’t willing to do it.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 weeks ago

    Says Microsoft propaganda site.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago

    I bet OpenAI and Copilot were the original source of this information.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago

    Satya Nadella pets a white cat.

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    Great going denmark. /s This should not have been much of a challange. And you failed.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    I rather disagree, this was always going to be hard. Microsoft will have put serious pressure on them not to switch, and its pain-in-the-ass proprietary lock-in tactics create a lot of friction in making a transfer. And let's also acknowledge that the average office worker is so much a creature of habit that they can't easily adapt to new software without costly trainings and months of service, and even then many people never fully adapt. I don't love that Denmark is stepping back, but let's not pretend that entrenched technologies and contracts are easy to switch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    My organization is slowly switching away from all Microsoft and other SaaS software, there's never been a better time to switch to open source, ever.

    The only reason it's taking long is because we are a small team and don't have the capacity to handle that project full time, so it comes one small incremental step at a time.

    A government has the resources to employ the right talent to get the job done, it's either incompetence or interference.

    Edit:

    A pilot phase with 38 ministry employees kicked off last year to trial Collabora's suite with Office documents. However, this trial was terminated when elections took place earlier this year. A spokesperson confirmed that the experiment had concluded, and would not resume again. They also confirmed that no evaluation benchmarking Collabora's performance against Microsoft Office had taken place either.

    It was interference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    I'm working on building a little demo with Saltcorn before bringing it up to my boss probably in a week or two as a strong contender for our EHS system replacement. We've got a mess of an EHS system with a ton of stuff that isn't actually EHS-related bolted on that we're replacing it with 3 systems, and one of those three will be for the non-EHS stuff which my boss is currently wanting to build in-house from scratch using AI. I'm hoping to help him dodge that thermonuclear warhead of a mistake by showing him an existing platform that will scale much further before costing us a ton in development costs to maintain

    My big argument is going to be on cost+effort front with the added benefit of being open source so we can control it no matter what happens with the vendor

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago

    The worst is that they are expecting complex formats to "just open" and using those complex formats. It's the EU, such a thing as a modern office format should be standardized the hell through, there should be a format specifically designed for all such places, MSO just shouldn't be a factor. Yet when MS kickbacks are involved, it's fine to use something unfit for the task and call a couple of blank pages (at page breaks, I assume) a fatal flaw. Anyway, text formats are complex, but not that complex, MSO's OOXML is just intentionally left open and with variety of interpretations and with implementation's data structures not important for anything written into the standard and in general it's a scam device and MS should have been fined like 50 billion for publishing it and daring to propose it to official entities and as a standard.

    What I don't understand is why can't we use something like XHTML with and and tags and a WYSIWIG editor.

    I mean, OK, I've spent a few months playing with prototyping a document format with edits history and comments and it's not as easy as it seems, but applying what worked for me to a content format like described above with links to blobs by hashes, blobs stored in the same zipfile, one could get something usable for many office tasks.

    Not even talking about org-mode, you know, existing, with just a bit of extension that could fill the role of many office applications.

    I mean, no need to even talk about "fit for the task" and efficiency. 90s' WordPerfect was good enough for the same uses. The complexity of formats is a deliberate way to limit competition by MS and a deliberate excuse to keep getting kickbacks for the organizations in question.

    There's just one thing that can be done - to make it mandatory to use software developed by government contract for this specific purpose for all governmental stuff, and make it FOSS, and with a FOSS format, and with specifications simple enough for a student to write an editor.

    Anyway. This is all dreams.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 2 weeks ago

    They didn't even try. It seems it was all a show.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago

    I could easily believe that it was more work than they expected and so they decided that it wasn't worth it after all, but man. Do it anyway.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago

    How big was the bribe?

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago

    EU leaders are lying to you. This is a global class war.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    This is not particularly surprising since Collabora leverages the Open Document Format (ODF) rather than Microsoft's proprietary OOXML specification. Microsoft's specification has previously caused problems for other vendors like LibreOffice's The Document Foundation (TDF) too.

    While it seems elections killed this initiative, the above is why I recommended EuroOffice or OnlyOffice for converts. It has a more MS feel and much, much better support for conversions.

    I'm still confused why TDF hasn't put more time into opening other formats.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

    What a bunch of weak ass removed. I did it a few years ago. I'm on Nextcloud and collabora. I spend a lot of my life in spreadsheets. In their defense, collabora's choices when it comes to key commands and defaults could not possibly be more stupid. For example, if you are pasting something into a spreadsheet, only a clown would think the default should be paste with formatting? At least give us a "ctl-shift-V" or something like that. So stupid. Just mimic google sheets and be done with it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    I don't agree with their decision, but migrating any large organization to new software is typically a lot more difficult than migrating a single home user.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago

    Agreed. But Fyi, I'm not a home user, I own a small business.We have to train employees on Collabpra and other open source tools. Its not that hard. We have tons of collaborative, shared documents that our clients interact with. Cybersecurity is a thing, but its not all that difficult to not be slave, or involuntary contributor to the dark side.live by your principles or capitulate. I know which choice I'll make. I also know that 90+% of people wouldn't even consider the extra burden of defining, much less living on principles. That's so sad.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago*

    What, did they try Win+E and it wouldn't open a file browser on linux? 🤣

    edit: Oh my bad, i read that as Microsoft, not Microsoft office.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    I wonder if detecting incompatibilities in rendering docx formatted documents in LibreOffice and Collabora is something that AI models could actually help with. If you had a large enough dataset of various docx (or other Microsoft formatted files) you could have Word and LibreOffice render each of the files and then have the model check the two renderings for differences. If something shows up you could probably use a second model to highlight what elements of the relevant docx file was at fault. That way when something shows up consistently the tool could provide that data to the relevant teams to fix the problem. I think there will always be so many edge cases with problems like this that having humans test at this scale wouldn't be a good use of engineering time.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago

    Y'all being surprised is the funny part.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    I genuinely, genuinely don't understand the need for microsoft office. A text editor has sufficed for everything I have ever wanted to do.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (2 children)

    Excel spreadsheets bigger than databases. And the userbase doesn’t know any other options because of monopoly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    It's actually amazing that Microsoft has been able to keep their users inside their walled garden for so many decades. When I was a teenager in the 90s, the same argument was used... That their users don't care to look for other options. And it's as true now as then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    You can be sure Microsoft was working its utmost hardest to make this not work, and make it look bad. All the more reason to get away from them as fast as possible.

    The best way is to stop using office documents altogether. It's legacy computing that at shouldn't be needed any more.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Yo be fair, alternatives to office suck.... Office is by far the superior choice.

    People using alternatives usually say "this is enought for my knowledge/use"

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Libre office is at least on par. In my experience it has far fewer bugs and is far less frustrating to use.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    It's fine if you don't want to do complex stuff and most importantly are the only one using it, offline. Good luck if you want to start sharing over a network for multi user editing, viewing, reviewing etc which is what any org needs

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Libre office certainly exceeds the web edition of office in functionality. I'm not aware of a gap to the desktop version, but I'm not a power user for sure. That lack of multi-user editing is almost a feature for me given how often other people have screwed up my spreadsheets in Excel.

    What i think really happens is that people compare whilst trying to swap documents back and fore with MS office. When judged on that level it comes off poorly, but that's not a fair metric. MS has intentionally worked against compatibility.

  • source
  • parent