AI investment has helped keep markets and economic growth ticking along, but the IMF fears the boom could quickly turn to bust if the promised profits fail to materialize. With tech giants borrowing billions and investors piling into the same handful of companies, a selloff could leave more than just Silicon Valley nursing a hangover.

top 88 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 115 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

If so, the technobros did this. The technobros should receive most of the consequences. There should be dire consequences but we all know who will receive most of that. The system is broken.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Sorry. The techbros will get bailouts. Its the pensioners that will starve.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago

    It's the pensioners who made most of the money from NVDA and MU price graphs going vertical anyway. Friendly reminder that people over 55 own 73% of the US, much of it via index fund based retirement funds and such. Isolating just the boomers, they own 8x more wealth than billionaires (though there's a fair bit of overlap of course, with a lot of billionaires themselves being boomers). Total over 50% of the US (including everything from cash to real estate to stocks) is owned JUST by the boomer generation.

    Which is not to say the techbros aren't the problem, but in absolute dollar amounts, they're not actually the biggest beneficiaries - only per person did they make more money off this. Not as a class.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    That's why the techbros made sure to buy the politicians.

    This will be like 208-2012 but this time around it's the techbros businesses which will be deemed "Too big to fail" and get saved with public money and the central bank printing money to buy their bonds, whilst everybody else pays for it with Austerity.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 60 points 2 weeks ago

    "Greedy shitbag tech bros pushed it. Greedy shitbag investors threw every penny at it. So whoops, the whole world is held hostage. Sorry fuckos, you, John and Jane public, are going to pay to save the global economy. Greedy fucksticks aren't allowed to lose."

    ...can't wait.

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

    The whole AI bubble is just one big bet: "AGI is around the corner and will replace all white collar jobs"

    Now, LLMs get slowly better but aren't AGI and it's unclear if our current approach is even capable of reaching AGI.

    Sadly the US went 'all-in' on the bet and everyone except the ultra rich will feel the pain.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 weeks ago

    The lack of progress is one thing.

    The value for money is another: AI companies are still burning through vast sums of capital, while users are indeed using the products more and more... but still nowhere near at a price that would even cover the companies’ costs, let alone be profitable. If each token costs a few dollars, demand is likely to shrink significantly again... because as long as the systems operate stochastically and, logically, produce erroneous results, it may take a very large number of tokens to obtain a result that’s actually usable (this is especially true when using AI to replace workers whose tasks and skills you actually have no clue about).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    AGI will never happen with LLMs, but if you think in terms of a human brain out can be effective language and output and image recognition module. But there's no there there. Something else entirely is needed for true thought and sentience. But llm ai is already sufficient to translate machine thought into language sentences. You just need the spark of life that can actually think for itself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    You just need the spark of life that can actually think for itself.

    I know it's probably not intentional but you make it sound as if "just putting a spark of life" into the machine is easy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    if the promised profits fail to materialize.

    What profits? Nobody has money to spend and llm companies lose money on $200/mo subscriptions.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    They lose money on those $200 a month subscriptions, but e.g Anthropic won't let you use the sub outside of Claude Code, so for anything that would use their API, $200 gets you less usage than one 5-hour session of that subscription.

    Which doesn't stop them from losing a bunch of money to training though

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 2 weeks ago* (4 children)

    Buffett Index: total stock valuation vs. GDP

    1928: 130%

    2007: 130%

    2025: 220%

    Now guess where most of that stock growth and GDP came from? I'll give ya three guesses, but you're only going to need one.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 weeks ago

    The economy as it stands is a house of cards built on promises no one keeps but enough people believe.

    I have never claimed to be an expert on anything but the moment you let the fate of something rest on the guess of how much it will cost if everything goes the way you think it will, when the other half of the room hope it goes the other way seems mad.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Yeah the "business" tycoons do that every decade or so. Some busts are bigger than others. Not much any of us can do about it unless we tax the hell out of corps and wealthy so that they can't build enough self serving shit to then dump the economy once they've scraped as much money as they can in the current cycle.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I'm convinced at this point the goal is to just not use money. Why do we have to be tied to this shitty fiat currency that isn't directly tied to physical worth?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 2 weeks ago*

    don't stop, i'm so close

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)
  • [–] 11 points 2 weeks ago
    [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago

    Burn it all down!

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    If profits are what will make it fail. It is going to fail. They need everyone to subscribe to their premium tiers at this point.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Wouldn’t matter. The cost to execute the tokens is greater than the subscription. It’s all VC funds that they’re burning every day. It’s inevitable to fail unless they can convince every day users to pay $2k a month

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I'd pay them 2k a month for every month they pay me 10k for. Ofc I need to be paid first because otherwise I won't have the money to pay them and still comfortably live.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    No that’s kinda the point. If AI charged for actual cost, no one could afford it. It’s all subsidized now. Basically a money shredder

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    API costs start to approach the operating costs of these systems. The ultra premium subscription tiers still lose money.

    Tech has high market value because there’s the potential for growth, and the cost to grow is minimal after the initial startup costs. Adding a subscriber to a newspaper costs, say $0.20 for each subscriber; adding a Facebook user has a cost approaching zero as the user count grows. The problem with GenAI is that the inference cost grows linearly with usage, and the constant creation of new models means the training costs are also not recouped.

    The debt the datacenter builders are taking on are being traded as junk with high interest rates already, and they’re going higher. They’ll never generate the income that the rates demand much less recoup the cost of building.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago

    The problem with GenAI is that the inference cost grows linearly with usage, and the constant creation of new models means the training costs are also not recouped.

    probably even slightly more than linear at this point as they use up so much electricity and other resources that it becomes more and more expensive to serve more users. User 1 is easy, that's just the existing data center. User 1 million, well, you need a new datacenter and drive up hardware prices, but it's fine. User 10 million, you need to build/rent gas power plants, figure out where to get water from, RAM and everything costs 5 times as much as it used to, bribe local politicians to build despite backlash etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago

    Let's hope so!

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago
    [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago

    Then we riot.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago

    thats rich coming from the IMF.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    If the thing we call an economy no longer becomes sustainable, maybe going to QUD mechanics of trade or going back to bartering might become a thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago*

    If they were at all serious about AGI there would be less focus on ever-improving the dead end of LLMs on that. They just want employers to think they can pay robots less than their workers, full stop.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago
    [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago*

    DUH. The Great Depression of 1929, and it took the world economy, and it fomented into World War.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago

    🀞🀞🀞

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    The economy isnt going anywhere its just going into a recession again, nothing you havent seen before if you were born before the Bush administration.

  • source
  • I hope AI dies with a wheeze and a babble of nonsensical output that leaves the pseudoscientific and influencer crowd poring over it looking for meaning in it for decades.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    The impossible mission force?! What are they doing making public statements?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    They've been comprised. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to infiltrate the IMF and remove compromised agents by any means necessary. If you are captured or killed the Secretary will disavow any knowledge of your actions. Good luck. This message will self-destruct in 5....

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    The new pseudoscience taking out the incumbent pseudoscience is the net zero we need.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago
    [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    COVID took the global economy with it.

    Losing AI would be like... I don't even know, insignificantly small compared to that.

    If AI up and disappeared tomorrow when I clocked into work, it might actually make my job easier. I could be even more productive without having the slop floodgates open every day.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    The problem is not the "losing of AI", it's the loss of human and physical resources that went into AI and will ultimatelly yield little or no Economic value when they could have been gone into productive Economic activities.

    The human part is similar to COVID - people's time that could have been used in Economically productive activities was lost and will never come back - however the AI bubble differs in that actual physical resources have been wasted (mainly building and equiping datacenters) whilst during COVID fewer physical resources were used (mainly in vaccines and PPE).

    Also the AI bubble is mostly concentrated in the US, whilst COVID was global, which means that the damage of it blowing up will probably be worse in the US, whilst that of COVID was much more diffused.

    But the really big things is not even the AI bubble blowing up per-se - it's that there are other bubbles which are ready to blow (such as realestate Worldwide and auto-loans in the US) plus a worldwide Oil crisis caused by America's war against Iran, so the Economic shock of the AI bubble blowing will be amplified by the latter and will likely make the former blow up, almost certainly adding up to even more damage that the 2000 and 2008 Crashes (possibly as much as both put together).

    COVID was a slowdown of Economic productivity, this shit will probably be the Find Out stages all on top of each other of years of Fuck Around misallocating resources in multiple Economic domains.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    That would be awful, we must save them and give all our money to their wonderful project. We will sacrifice ourselves and live in the woods while they improve their drunk chatbot that should cure cancer any minute now.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago*

    Don't worry, they'll use your taxes to make it profitable. Then, when AI can do your job by being trained by your data, they'll fire you and throw you to the curb and suddenly start talking about sustainability and the issue of overpopulation.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 child)

    TBH I don't see how it could take anything with it. The money invested will still exist except for interest on loans and unrealized gains which don't actually exist because of overvaluation.

    This isnt like the mortgage crisis. Anybody who gets fucked over by this crash deserves it.

    In fact, the longer this is allowed to go on without crashing the more money people like Jason Huang siphons from pensions.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago

    2 exceptions to what you said.

    1. Whatever money raised through IPOs and other public investment is mostly the general public's saving accounts. So far it's just $80bn in the SpaceX IPO and $40bn from the bond issue they did shortly after.
    2. Just like the mortgage crisis it's the banks holding the debt that's been issued. Now since 2008 they were meant to firewall between their retail banking arms and their investment arms so that if they fucked up again the retail banks were safe. However this legislation got repealed in the US, so we could be looking at a bank bailout again to make sure the banking system doesn't collapse with everybody's money in it.

    The money loaned still exists, you're right. Trouble is it's not in the AI companies anymore. It's been spent. It's gone through them out to other companies (like Nvidia, MS Azure, AWS, Google Cloud, etc).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    No shit, Sherlock!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

    I am using chatgpt without paying them. I'm doing my part to waste their resources! When AI finally stops being shoved down my throat, it'll be a good day.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

    You think they aren’t harvesting your data for advertising?

    And even if you are somehow anonymized, any usage to juice their numbers is what they want.

    If you want to stick it to ChatGPT, use their competition. GLM, Xiaomi, Deepseek, Mistral, Nemotron, whatever;their absolute deepest fear is the public pivoting to actually free models. And you can use them with whatever level of privacy you wish, since you aren’t locked to vendors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    I mean, we could also just not have AI at all. I dunno what point you're trying to make, but it's not landing. I am extremely anti-AI, and I want it to just go away. But, guess what, it isn't, and they will keep shoving it down our throats until the AI bubble bursts and they take the global economy with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    @NocturnalMorning @brucethemoose How can you be "extremely anti-"AI" and still use a LLM? There is no right life in the wrong one. Theodor W. AdornoThere is no ethical use of "AI"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    Oh boy, another, you want to improve society, and yet you participate in it argument. Gee, how original. I understand what you are trying ti get at, but you aren't going to win any friends going around telling everyone they are evil for using a tool that is being shoved down all of societies throat.

    Hell, my work has an internal AI tool, and I refuse to use it. Are you happy? Probably not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    @NocturnalMorning It's not about winning you as friend. It is your free choice using Chat GPT or other "tools" as you call them mad by antidemocratic transhumanistic Tech Oligarchs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Do you just go around trolling people everywhere you go, or are you incapable of having a discussion with people without insulting them or someone else in the process? You're preaching to the choir anyway...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    Oh boy, another, you want to improve society, and yet you participate in it argument.

    Then why not use Reddit, too?

    ...But you're already on Lemmy.

    No one is making you use ChatGPT; there are free alternatives every direction you look. This is not a 'participating in society' argument, it's a really low-effort choice, far lower effort than choosing to use the Fediverse.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago
    [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    So, if it takes the global economy away then you could still eat an apple but there would be no price tag attached. Money has always been a middle-man of questionable and ever-changing value.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    It's not taking the global economy away in that sense.

    It'll blow up the global economy in that a lot of people will be unemployed and everyone's retirement funds will crash (which is fair, because AI is what made them go up so fast in the first place). A few rich people will also lose a bunch of money, but the clever ones will actually profit off it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    good

    if an oppressive corrupt regime is purposely hampering social progress for billions of people, not only should it fail, it should fail globally on a scale that resets global economies by centuries.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 child)

    Yea, good. Billions of people should starve so a couple of wealthy people lose a bit of money but not enough to need to sell their yachts. Let's blow up the global economy!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    ah, a centrist!

    tell me. how many people will die from malnutrition and neglect when the human race is enslaved by a ruling class that only cares about increasing profits over social programs?

    how many people will die when the environment crumbles and it's impossible to grow crops or support livestock without the power held by a ruling class?

    tell me. how many people are you willing to sacrifice to ensure economic stability continues?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Been doomsday-prepped since 10 years ago. Expecting the worst at anytime.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Okay just wake me up when UBI starts.

  • source
  • [+] -7 points 2 weeks ago

    It won’t. Bubbles don’t burst.

  • source