all 52 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 158 points 1 month ago

Woah woah, are you telling me that the surveillants don’t like being surveilled? I’m shocked, absolutely shocked I tell ya

  • source
  • [–] 155 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    The city I work at just ended their contract with them. Monday morning I get to send them a demand to remove them from our ROW within 30 days or we'll have them removed and fine them $500/camera per day until they pick them up and pay us our expenses related to the removal.

    Our police are also bagging the cameras, including the solar panels (so they'll shut off).

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 1 month ago (8 children)
  • [–] 42 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I mean, they did still allow the cameras to begin with

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I'd take someone willing to learn from a mistake over someone who doubles down though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    We're assuming they didn't just switch brands.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    They did not.

    City Council is made of of people who were misled by the "they only read license plates" bullshit. When they realized what they truly are, they decided not to renew the contract. Then a few days ago they took it a step further and decided to suspend it early along with their right-of-way permits.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I wouldn't go that far. It's an enclave for the mega-rich. I don't live there - literally every household is millionaires or better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 1 month ago

    We NEED to Protect the Privacy of American Citizens! Innocent People! Corporations stealing BILLIONS of Taxpayer Dollars!

  • source
  • [–] 40 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    The nerd in this case being the OSM community

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

    OSM FTW!

    EDIT: I do get accused of frequent, excessive, obscure use of initialisms.

    Open Street Maps - Our Street Maps, not goog, not apple

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 37 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    My town uses the other brand, that might account for some of the difference

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 month ago*

    Flock is not the only brand of ALPR (Automatic License Plate Reader). Its the brand/company that is receiving the most negative press, which means other companies providing the same service are quietly sneaking into towns and cities.

    If you drive in an area covered by an ALPR-networked camera, your vehicle’s movements may already be in a searchable database. As the tools for building these systems become more widely available, the pressure for clearer rules about who may collect vehicle-location data, on whom, and for how long is unlikely to ea

    As always keep reaching out to your local city council to ask where are these cameras being installed, how long is the information being retained, who is accessing these systems, and who is keeping the individuals accessing these systems accountable?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The one with all the product placement on The Rookie, Axon? They need to go fuck themselves too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    Product placement? More like just reality.

    Axon is the maker of Taser, and like 90% of the body cams that departments use. ALPRs are simply the newest of many tools they offer, and adding Axon ALPRs to replace Glock is probably extremely easy since there is a 99.99% chance they already have Axon products, and an existing contract.

    Axon is not new by any means.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 55 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    also so they can get a snapshot of all the IP addresses/people signed into google who tried searching the map. which...surprise...where's the map LOL

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago

    So is flock putting them up?

    Angie Nixon mentioned this case in South Florida on a recent interview: https://archive.is/my13H

    It really opens the door for any other third party to put up cameras and surveil without anyone noticing it.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago

    “If they’re not doing anything wrong”

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago* (4 children)

    If the map isn't reporting any false information then they don't have a legal grounds for the removal and this likely violates anti-slap laws.

    Flock is a private company with equal rights to everyone else: no more, no less.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Flock isn't the only entity operating security cameras and plate readers. How many non-Flock devices are being reported as Flock units?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    It's a good question but given Flock's cooperation with the ICE I don't want to give them benefit of doubt. https://deflock.org/ isn't currently listing the supposed 300,000 nor does it claim they're all flock.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Oh, I don't mean to give them any credit whatsoever. I'm just saying that it's very likely that there is "false information" included this set. That doesn't mean they actually have a significant case, just that the claims may need to be adjusted to the generic "Camera" or "ALPR" rather than "Flock" specifically.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (14 children)

    so has anyone figured out a reasonable way to block plates from being read?

    an adhesive layer, a clear coat, a plastic cover with the right spectrum blocking?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago

    The pretty common one is to have infrared LEDs shining on the plate. Humans can't see the light but cameras can and it blinds them. It's worth noting that it's illegal, and if the police catch you doing it they'll arrest you just for that. I'm not sure how much help that is, but then again, any technique that blocks the cameras from reading your plate is likely considered illegal.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The problem is that they don't just read the plates. They look at everything on the vehicle. Window stickers, license plate frames, cleanliness, scratches/dents, etc. Trying to disguise your plate will just make your vehicle more readily recognizable, and notify authorities that you have something to hide.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    I'm pretty sure there are laws that specifically say if you do something to prevent your plate from being read by these devices it's illegal. But it wouldn't matter anyway. They track you based on more than your plate. They even track pedestrians by looking at their clothing and such.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Think thats scary look up gait recognition. I remember reading a book in middle school almost 20 years ago, in the book they used gait recognition because facial recognition was deemed to invasive and was made illegal. Probably based on real life but I never looked into the legality of it. The original Punisher show on Netflix also brought it up, its how the hacker dude finds Frank Castle and kicks off the shows plot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Yeah but that's easier to fake just put a rock in your shoe

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    You cannot legally modify your license plate in any way, even if it leaves the number and stickers fully visible. I wonder if you couldn't do something to the area surrounding your license plate though to make the AI detection ignore your car/plates...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago

    40% of the truth. Flock lies likes Facebook.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago
    [–] 12 points 1 month ago*

    I agree with the sentiment, but the deflock map also lists all automated highway tolls as ALPRs too. These aren’t flock based to my knowledge.

    There may be “secret” flock installations. But there are also likely other brands and systems included in the 300k.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    We are living in a voyeur's dream world

  • source