Why not just use GIMP? I don't really use image manipulation and editing except for extremely basic things, so maybe GIMP has some important limitations I don't know about.
post
Or you could use paint.net and NOT support data centers destroying the planet.
For real! It's partially what keeps me coming back to Windows. I yearn for the day when Paint.net can be ran on Linux.
Last time I tried using Paint.NET (early last year, I think) it had significant feature gaps compared to the likes of Photoshop, Krita, or Gimp. It's a good start. And I know it's an open source project that's dependent on contributions and funds. But if you need to edit images beyond some relatively basic features, it's not there yet.
Not using this doesn't help with that though? It is already released, telling them not to make it would help but it's too late now?
Because this behavior shouldn't be encouraged.
disagree, if they reimplement this as foss software and it crushes adobe it will be nothing but a good thing, sure ai overall is bad but ai was happening anyway and minimizing the harm of it by using it for actually good things for the foss movement is the least problematic possible thing to do with a highly problematic tech.
Minimizing the harm means not using it. AI output doesn't come out of nothing. It's generated at significant ecological cost.
They were going to use it anyway. The notion that your boycott will accomplish anything when the tool is this unbelievably useful is insane, fight this at the regulatory level, furthermore the ecological impact is quite minor if you use Chinese ai due to the solar farms.
Every action can be taken via the cli too, this makes video editing ai saas the next job to get strangled.
Prompt: here’s my footage I’d like it in the same edit style as youtuber yakkah at 25:00 long.
Linux devs have shown that the Butlerian Jihad is not ready yet.
- not open source
- not a clone
- illegal
- to be zapped by Adobe in 10 seconds
I've been saying it for a while now, but I think the techies going nuts over AI and automation are shooting themselves in the foot.
By producing so much software so quickly, they're doing the same thing AI did to art. They're devaluing it.
Well. Vibecoded software is kind of a different duck, because it’s so unstable and ends up being a completely unmaintainable replacement/alternative. I’d say it’s more “shit” than even diffusion-made media.
It’s similar in that it’s a short-term fix. You use diffusion when you want something right now, and cheap, everything else be damned, and vibecoding is the same. This “impulse coding” also makes the projects quite ephemeral.
…But LLM coding is also a spectrum. There is a healthy amount of LLM automation that absolutely helps small projects or solo devs, those that are already doing a great job without them. Clearly vibe coded projects like this aren’t healthy, but there are other instances where it’s actually a useful tool.
Trust me, as much shit as I talk about AI, I still use it even for personal things and see that there's a real technology here that will stick around. It's just hard to have a real conversation about that when it's muddied with "omg we let it loose to hack everything and it did", and "don't worry if it destroys the planet, Q4 will be great", and "don't worry if q4 is terrible and we're losing billions, because we might make AGI".
Not only that but they shoved it into everything and started producing as much slop as possible, while they convinced seemingly every CEO in the world they have to produce slop too. I see engineers who hate their lives now, who are being told to automate every aspect of their job until they're no longer required, and they don't care about what they make anymore because they feel so disconnected from their code.
We could have had a rational boost with this technology as a cool coding assistant, but instead we got whatever the fuck this blood sacrifice economy is. Meanwhile, some companies are shocked that no one wants to read their 100 new ai generated blog posts.
Actually, nobody's gonna use it at all. If it's AI-generated, then it's absolutely a duplicate of Photoshop. After a while, all updates will be stopped.
I do kind of wonder if Adobe will actually be able to shut it down. Photopea is pretty much a clone of Photoshop and its been going strong for years now, even charging money to remove ads.
I think it would be hilarious to see this open source project, with AI, be what finally brings a decent image editor to Linux and crushes adobe.
I really hope Artcraft is a pisstake. I have hope that it is a performance art project that makes a statement on AI use in art and the current copyright laws. Otherwise, it is just another slop project that takes attention away from real open source projects like GIMP and Inkscape.
...and a worst case scenario could be action against this "Artcraft Suite" setting a precedence for laws targeting open source projects.
no comments (yet)