sorted by: new top controversial old
Linus Torvalds Working On A Hefty Linux Kernel Improvement With Claude Code in c/technology@lemmy.world
Linus Torvalds Working On A Hefty Linux Kernel Improvement With Claude Code in c/technology@lemmy.world
Finally, me too into the void. in c/voidlinux@lemmy.ml
[–] [S] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

I don't know what it's mean by too much maintenance but for now I understood that the first effort to setup a system we want is all the effort. Then everything flows like a stream.

Maybe future updates or upgrades require user level configurations but I don't think thats too a big issue.

Btw, I too heard about NixOS but as you said about Void, NixOS is not for me too. How is your experience there? It is more like an immutable distro right?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • Finally, me too into the void. in c/voidlinux@lemmy.ml
    [–] [S] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    Me too. I didn't installed it in an hype, but the minimalism it gives and the unique working style.

    I think most people are sticking with systemd and not taking a look at another init systems because major distributions like debian, fedora, opensuse, arch, etc. are sticking with systemd.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • Finally, me too into the void. in c/voidlinux@lemmy.ml
    [–] [S] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    Nice to know.

    Actually, don't know why but I got a satisfaction of achieving something big with Void. Usually no matter which distro, fedora, debian, opensuse, arch, etc... I always get a urge to switch between them.

    But Void doesn't give such an urge, maybe the reason is my 3 failures to try to install it and 4th one was almost successful. But after getting know more again I required to reinstall entire repo. No everything is rock-solid and user friendly. Void + runit + KDE + No extra bloats.

    Highlight : The official free and non-free repo only contains apps that matters and no extra gui app store, fonts, themes, etc.

    (The only reason for previous failures is me who was lazy to read everything in manual and listen full youtube guides)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • Are Anti-AI Linux distributions practical? in c/linux@lemmy.ml
    Are Anti-AI Linux distributions practical? in c/linux@lemmy.ml
    Are Anti-AI Linux distributions practical? in c/linux@lemmy.ml
    [–] [S] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Btw, today I tried once again to install Void and successfully installed it on my computer. With 5hrs + concentrated setup, I installed graphic drivers, power management tools, swap and app armor on the system.

    Don't know how the experience will be, but this time, with a successful installation, I feel much more satisfied than building arch.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • Are Anti-AI Linux distributions practical? in c/linux@lemmy.ml
    Are Anti-AI Linux distributions practical? in c/linux@lemmy.ml
    61
    Are Anti-AI Linux distributions practical? (lemmy.ca)
     

    I have been using Linux for over 8 months now, and my primary distribution of choice was Debian.

    Debian recently conducted a community vote on allowing AI contributions, and it ended up allowing responsible AI contributions.

    What is this responsible? How can AI commits be responsible? There are thousands of reasons to not use AI, and the primary reason is AI is a thief.

    How did you react to Debian's decision? Did you switch distros? Which one was your option, and why?

    Also, when the Linux kernel itself allows AI commits, is there any practicality in a Linux distribution strictly limiting or restricting AI commits?

    I have no serious usability issue with Debian now but am concerned about the use of AI even in my Linux distribution. Should I keep going with Debian or consider any other distribution, as I only have 8+ months of experience as a daily Linux user? I tried almost all Linux distros and am comfortable with everything except Void Linux and highly complex ones like Gentoo.

    CSS link not working. Help and Advice needed. (Solved) in c/programming@programming.dev
    CSS link not working. Help and Advice needed. (Solved) in c/programming@programming.dev
    [–] [S] 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

    In stack overflow i saw,

    / = root of the current drive, ./ = current directory, ../ = parent of the current directory.

    What exactly is this .../ ?

    Btw, I solved it by writing the path like this,

    <link rel="stylesheet" href="../../styles/style.css" />

    <link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="../../images/favicon.png" />

    Thank you for taking time to answer me.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • 14
    CSS link not working. Help and Advice needed. (Solved) (lemmy.ca)
     

    Am trying to learn web development by creating a website my own instead learning every single theory written on a textbook.

    Currently am trying to link a stylesheet and favicon on my root folder into the file called debian.html and debian-post-install.html. But it's not working and I don't know why.

    code used inside both html files head section are,

    <link rel="stylesheet" href="/styles/style.css" />

    <link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="/images/favicon.png" />

    To point to the root directory files or directories we use / in html instead of ../ right? Then why it's not working.

    Also I need advice on how bad is my html file structuring and what changes recommended.

    Solution

    <link rel="stylesheet" href="../../styles/style.css" />

    <link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="../../images/favicon.png" />

    view more: next ›