[–] [S] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

I don't know what it's mean by too much maintenance but for now I understood that the first effort to setup a system we want is all the effort. Then everything flows like a stream.

Maybe future updates or upgrades require user level configurations but I don't think thats too a big issue.

Btw, I too heard about NixOS but as you said about Void, NixOS is not for me too. How is your experience there? It is more like an immutable distro right?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    Me too. I didn't installed it in an hype, but the minimalism it gives and the unique working style.

    I think most people are sticking with systemd and not taking a look at another init systems because major distributions like debian, fedora, opensuse, arch, etc. are sticking with systemd.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    Nice to know.

    Actually, don't know why but I got a satisfaction of achieving something big with Void. Usually no matter which distro, fedora, debian, opensuse, arch, etc... I always get a urge to switch between them.

    But Void doesn't give such an urge, maybe the reason is my 3 failures to try to install it and 4th one was almost successful. But after getting know more again I required to reinstall entire repo. No everything is rock-solid and user friendly. Void + runit + KDE + No extra bloats.

    Highlight : The official free and non-free repo only contains apps that matters and no extra gui app store, fonts, themes, etc.

    (The only reason for previous failures is me who was lazy to read everything in manual and listen full youtube guides)

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Btw, today I tried once again to install Void and successfully installed it on my computer. With 5hrs + concentrated setup, I installed graphic drivers, power management tools, swap and app armor on the system.

    Don't know how the experience will be, but this time, with a successful installation, I feel much more satisfied than building arch.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

    In stack overflow i saw,

    / = root of the current drive, ./ = current directory, ../ = parent of the current directory.

    What exactly is this .../ ?

    Btw, I solved it by writing the path like this,

    <link rel="stylesheet" href="../../styles/style.css" />

    <link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="../../images/favicon.png" />

    Thank you for taking time to answer me.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 2 points 4 weeks ago* (2 children)

    Am opening the html files in a web browser by double clicking it.

    Yeah, that makes sense. Thanks.

    Is there any other way I can define the path so the update directly visible in the web browser? Or the only way to do it is by changing the file structure?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    As a linux user with 8+ months experience, do you think considering Gentoo is good for me? I already tried all major distributions like linux mint, arch, debian, cachyos, fedora, mxlinux, voidlinux, etc. and sticked primarily to debian because of it's stability and huge package availability.

    Is currently am on a decent Linux distribution anyway when compared to microslop windows and fedora ? What do you think?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 1 point 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (4 children)

    I wonder if this much issues behind AI commits why debian, linux kernel and flahub are allowing AI commits.

    Do someone concious just switch from debian after this ?

    Also never heard about hyperOS linux distro.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›