you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Because this behavior shouldn't be encouraged.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

    disagree, if they reimplement this as foss software and it crushes adobe it will be nothing but a good thing, sure ai overall is bad but ai was happening anyway and minimizing the harm of it by using it for actually good things for the foss movement is the least problematic possible thing to do with a highly problematic tech.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    Minimizing the harm means not using it. AI output doesn't come out of nothing. It's generated at significant ecological cost.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    They were going to use it anyway. The notion that your boycott will accomplish anything when the tool is this unbelievably useful is insane, fight this at the regulatory level, furthermore the ecological impact is quite minor if you use Chinese ai due to the solar farms.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment