all 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 73 points 1 month ago (4 children)

If I were running a tech project, and elon musk offered to help I'd quickly begin questioning all of my life choices.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 70 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Well DHH is a Nazi fascist so he won't be questioning anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    This person assumes the best case for DHHs statements and excuses things by mentioning lack of information, but does not do the same for the person they are arguing against

    This can of course be explained by them not realizing that, but that would mean that both the original post and this one are not thought out enough

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    This article does everything in its power to try to twist DHH's words in some charitable manner while assigning (and subsequently defecating on) some arbitrary Rubyisms to an article that had nothing to do with Ruby.

    Ironically, the article does exactly what it claims the others were doing by assuming those others were responding to his article based on uncharitable assumptions or poor faith.

    The words a person chooses to write in a blog post are thought-out and explicit. He chose his wording to convey the meaning it did, knowing full well what the connotations of those sentences were. He reinforces those connotations with his later speech. And now he solidifies that message by accepting something of monetary value from Musk.

    The far-right plausable deniability game isn't going to work here. Evaluating speech solely on the semantic meaning of the words alone disregards the most valuable parts of communication. His message was clear, and it's people like this who choose to ignore it (or who silently agree, though I don't know this author so I have no clue which it is).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Lol. $1.5M in Grok tokens. The gooning and misinformation service.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago

    Thanks for the warning, I guess.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The funny thing is that DHH isnt even doing anything with that much money to make Omarchy better, seems like all money is going into his pocket

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago

    Of course they did. Omarchy is one of the only openly fascist-run Arch customizations.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    And watch while they claim $1.5MM in revenue and $1.5MM in "marketing" to juice their books just a bit more.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    Of course it does. There is no reason to do this except to say "yay" to DHH being racist.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 weeks ago

    I guess that settles the entire debate, in case anyone had any doubts.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago
    [–] 5 points 4 weeks ago

    I feel like I am living in a simulation where the creators are just messing with us now. The headlines have just gotten too oniony over time.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Is there a list of these asshole backers anywhere, so we all know who to boycott?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago*

    elon backs nazi; shocking headline....

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago*

    This reminds me; I gotta get rid of 1password.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago*

    Nazi pseudodistros aside, I wonder if they could sell those tokens for real money. If not, it might as well be 1.5M in magic beans.

  • source
  • 62 comments in c/linux@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 133 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    That confirms it, Omarchy is the official operating system of bigots.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 93 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 45 points 1 month ago

    fucking called it when the first batch of millions started rolling in. not that it was too difficult to see. disappointing to see many open source folks being like "who cares?", which is just the head-in-sand reaction i'm used to encountering when talking about fascist politics with locals. it seems to me that the users who are ready to welcome large amounts of institutional capital into open source projects don't understand that it comes with strings attached. maybe they think more money = more eye candy = growing userbase = better video game support on linux? idk, hate to see fascism creep into every aspect of my personal interests

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 115 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    God fucking damit, so many open source projects struggle for money and yet, that fascist jackass' dot file distro gets all the support. That's maddening...

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Just gonna shamelessly leave these two paragraphs out of the website of my own distro here.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 35 points 1 month ago

    Nazis back Nazis... More at 11

  • source
  • [–] 62 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    Because of course it would.

    I swear the move to replace the GNU ecosystem with Rust tooling has more to do with a corporate EEE push to remove all libre licensing than with memory safety or anything else.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (5 children)
  • [–] 31 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Which is very frustrating, because retiring C & C++ is long overdue IMO, but for reasons unknown to me, the Rust community is strongly against copyleft licensing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago*

    I think the fact it's statically linked plays a role. Common licences like the LGPL won't work, leaving the MPL or the less similar but more commonly known MIT license

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Wouldn't surprise if Creative Commons had something to do with this. The copyleft licenses of it, of anything more restrictive basically than MIT and "attribution", are listed as "restrictive" and "not open" or something. I think coupled with the complicated legal language versus "idk, whatever man" doesn't help for lots of new projects.

    That said... Most of the stuff I've done has been so "idk, man, I made a thing for me and figured others might benefit" that I just gave it the MIT license for that reason. And it may just be as simple as that reasoning.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    The rust community prefers freedom as in free to do whatever you want, copyleft has a different definition of freedom.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago*

    Thank you, Captain Obvious. The Rust community prefers that corporations have the freedom to embrace, extent, and extinguish open source contributions. Or maybe they don’t prefer it so much as they’re ignorant of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    seema like concentrated effort to steer linux desktop in a certain direction

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    seema like concentrated effort to steer a specific linux desktop distribution in a certain direction

    There we go, I corrected your typos for you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    While I agree Linux is inherently anti fragile and can survive enshittification by corporate goons, that amount of money that this dot file Linux installer will have a heavy effect on what projects get funded and which ones are left to their own.

    There's a nice donate page on the archlinux site and let me guess how much they'll get from this foundation when afaik the arch team had turned down whatever partnership the dot file installer guy wanted. Should come anyways no strings attached right? Considering they're funding hyprland. So using arch as a base would imply they would fund them no strings attached.... Right? lol

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 99 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    Its almost as if DHH and those transphobes over at Hyprland(not to mention Lunduke, Luke Smith, Distrotube, and the various cadre of right wing little bissh boys on YouTube) all forgot about Linus Torvalds.

    A screenshot of a comment from Linus Torvalds which reads: "I think you might want to make sure you don’t follow me. Because your “woke communist propaganda” comment makes me think you’re a moron of the first order. I strongly suspect I am one of those “woke communists” you worry about. But you probably couldn’t actually explain what either of those words actually mean, could you? I’m a card-carrying atheist, I think a woman’s right to choose is very important, I think that “well regulated militia” means that guns should be carefully licensed and not just randomly given to any moron with a pulse, and I couldn’t care less if you decided to dress up in the “wrong” clothes or decided you’d rather live your life without feeling tied to whatever plumbing you were born with. And dammit, if that all makes me “woke”, then I think anybody who uses that word as a pejorative is a f*cking disgrace to the human race. So please just unfollow me right now."

    As far as I'm concerned Linux is for the left. But heck when an ideology like fascism is born out of grifting off left wing ideology (i.e. See Mussolini's socialist/anarchist father), the right can just appropriate whatever they want...but they'll still always be little bissh boys to me.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Sounds like he may be a socially progressive liberal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    wouldn't even go that far, the examples he mentioned are pretty uncontroversial at this point

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    He lives in the US though so should we be using European or American terms? In American terms he absolutely is a liberal, based on all the stances mentioned, whereas in European terms, liberal more or less means capitalist

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago

    $1.5 million in compute = actual expense for Elmo is zero as Elmo's datacenter is massively overprovisioned and is currently leasing compute to all their competitors

    But of course Elmo needs to send a message to the world: "please avoid this distro"

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago

    How much compute does dot-files actually need...? /shrug

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I hate the phrase "X$ in compute" so much. What does that even mean? It could mean a 1.5 million dollar value worth of donated time on one of their servers, or it could mean a hardware donation, or it could be a cash donation that is earmarked for server upgrades/chip purchases. Ever since AI took off it's become such a common turn of phrase to use "compute" like this. As if the amount of money spent tells you anything useful about the amount of things they can "compute" now. Costs are so variable and spread out across many different areas that it changes day by day, and by which vendor you use, or what part of the world you are in, or all kinds of other things.

    Maybe I'm just behind the times and it has some specific meaning now I'm not aware of. Either way it annoys me.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Compute means CPU/GPU time and has meant it for ages

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    So what does "1.5mil$ in CPU/GPU time" mean then? It doesn't make sense. That's not a standardized unit of time. Are we talking tokens like with AI? Whatever SpaceX's going rate is to use their servers? Some other commercial service? That's why I don't like it being used like this. It would be like me saying I am donating 1.5 million dollars of "food" to the homless. Like that's great right, but what the fuck do I mean by food? I could be giving them rice and beans, caviar, or anything in between. Meal vouchers to mcdonalds, or working with soup kitchens. It's just vague.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago

    What a goddamn joke

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    lol some bigot loser 'we're not political! 'who never used Linux before getting all this money and surprise he has little understanding, hence still a shitty release.

    I tried it for a few weeks unfortunately just so i can see the trash first hand. and it is buggy, not intuitive to use, full of shit webapps for crap platforms and worthless because all of that agentic crap that you'd want can be easily done on a base arch install.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    After Chis Titus video, I am only going to ransack the quickshell configs. I really need some references on how to structure it. Don't worry, I also read some other configs and I am not aiming for ultimate eyecandy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    What happened or what information was the issue in that said video? I stopped watching Chris Titus for a long time (when he ditched Linux and went back to Windows, its years ago now).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Oh, he just made a point, that for him, it is worth to take some of its ideas and implement them into his own config. And I kinda feel the same about my sway setup.

    Basically, it has cool stuff and you can read the configs and take what you like.

    video in question

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago

    omarchy really doesn't make any sense as a distro. If someone really wants an agent, Why have all that slop prepackaged when you can just generate it yourself and have swim in your own slop.

    Are they really pegging their success on attracting people who can't even copy paste a basic Hermes agent install script?

    Yeah these people don't stay with Linux and they're attracting short lived attention and that's it.

    I kind of enjoy seeing these corporations donators burn their money and also their reputation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    There's obviously history here that I have missed. Can someone tell me about this distro and what makes it controversial?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 month ago

    Some Nazi nut took arch and made it worse by adding exploits like "any user process can escalate to root" or "web app notifications can execute any binary"

    Somehow the other Nazis are loving this mess and he's getting millions in sponsorships from companies that want to be boycotted

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago

    In fact it is surprisingly unimpressive on a technical level. An Arch-based Linux distribution with the Hyprland tiling window manager. That's it. The developer has grovelled to Musk and friends leading to rivers of gold flowing in. It's everything that's wrong with the US and tech billionaire oligarch class in general.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    isn't it SpaceXSI now 🤣

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 weeks ago

    Really laying it on thick now

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 weeks ago

    Everyone saw this coming.

  • source
  • Omarchy, Omarchy! It's Linux, for nazis!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    "Hey, Omarchy! Uninstall Omarchy."

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago

    American Aerospace AI company invests in new desktop operating system make it make sense

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    I use Arch*, BTW.

    ^*Arch=EndeavourOS^

  • source