[–] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

oh hell yeah, the lemmy liberals coming in HOT with the dehumanization again! are you gonna go to homophobia next? i can't wait for you to show your true colors. or are you gonna claim to be a "leftist" or even a "socialist" of some kind? must be the national socialist kind then.

edit: oh no, not the return of the impotent and ultimately ineffective downvotes! whatever shall i do? eat shit and die fascist, you pathetic fucking coward.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago

    Wikipedia is an inherently biased pro-Western source. BBC is an inherently biased pro-Western source. The UN is an inherently biased pro-Western source. The United States Government is an inherently biased pro-Western source. The OSCE is an inherently biased pro-Western source. The Conversation is just a publication, that uses the UN report as its (inherently biased, pro-Western) source. The UN report itself provides no evidence for its claims. Throughout your sources is evident that no-one bothered to ask the Russians what's up with these allegations. So I'd concur this as whataboutism, as well as cope and seethe. Keep crying, fascist.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

    That is true, and I hope they too learn to break through their preprogramming. Remains to be seen I guess. Edit: going through their modlog, it seems they are an unrepentant racist and repeat offender shitslinger. I hope they continue eating shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    I replied too fast, got thrown off by you putting the global south into quotation marks. Why did you do that, what did you mean by that? I'm struggling to understand your points.

    For what it's worth, my home country (in the EU) has some 550 000 immigrants living here, about 10% of the population. I suspect those are mostly people doing "shit jobs" (ie. cleaning, thrash management, other manual labor) that the locals refuse to do (because the work is hard and the pay is shit), preferring the status of labor aristocracy (ie. white collar jobs, tech sector etc.) and petit bourgeoisie (ie. small business ownership or other such) over those they see inherently lesser than them (as a consequence of the culture of white supremacy they grew up in). This would be aligned with European post-WWII culture of unequal exchange with the countries of the global south. I understand that these camps wouldn't be used (at least immediately) against already established labor force, but against "illegal immigration". My question would be who is responsible for determining which immigration is illegal and what is stopping them from narrowing the scope of legality (say, deporting LGTBQ+ people fleeing repression in Russia to some third country, thereby placing them in even more danger because immigration from Russia can be deemed illegal at will). Even more disturbing is the (imo) very real possibility of the EU sinking ever deeper into the same kind of fascism as contemporary US, and eventually using these same processes of deportation to silence and remove internal dissidence (eg. anti-war, pro-socialism).

    Btw, it is not the "bourgeoisie" where anti immigration parties are the strongest but their stronghold is among the working class, interestingly not limited to those without immigration background.

    Again with the quotation marks. But indeed, it is thanks again to the white-supremacist culture in which these anti-immigration working class people have grown. There is an important sentence in the communist manifesto: "The ideology of all hitherto existing societies is the ideology of the ruling class". This ruling class in capitalist societies is the bourgeoisie. This page and that part especially explains the concept of ideologies in Marxism and its contradictions within the working class.

    My comment wasn't based on the current existence of European deportation camps, or even their stated use. But when capital goes into a crisis and the contradictions within capitalist societies heighten, what I wrote could as well eventually come to be. Who do you think were the first ones into Nazi concentration camps, or what kind of a society was the one from which Nazism awoke, or whose colonial practices those camps were based on? History doesn't always repeat, but it sure does rhyme.

    Edit: I see many downvotes, but zero replies or elaborations. Curious. If you have replied, then I have blocked you previously. You can keep eating shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    One-way ticket into a concentration camp in an undisclosed third country in the global south. Brought to you by the liberal, rules-based world order of the EU, I remember reading about the legislature surrounding this (possibly earlier this year, but weeks are like decades sometimes). The US is on the back-foot, throwing its various vassals under the proverbial bus to save its own ass, and in the wake the EU is receding to fascism to protect the capital and bourgeois rule. The situation in Europe seems increasingly unstable, as rioting swells in multiple countries with leaders in France at least unwilling to make really any concessions to the people, whose problems are consequences of the bourgeoisie's actions. The bourgeoisie here has been calling for increased military spending to make the continent ready for war by 2030, though they call it "preparing for invasion" to manufacture consent for increased military spending as a way out. In reality that spending will be used to further surveil and control you to prevent the people from organizing against the state, and to empower and arm the police to be used against the people in future riots. The bourgeoisie will never consider the working class's well-being over their own class's well-being.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Old money, new money... the problem is capitalism, the answer is proletariat organizing. It's true though, many people in Europe see the problems of unfettered capitalism in America, but somehow seem to fail to consider that it could, will and is happening here also.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    It is evident that there are people capable of thinking around the Euro elites. But time after time they seemingly decide to trust their own judgement better than the experts, and just double down on "exploit the working class". But then again, as long as people keep obeying (voting) nothing will change.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    So the USA is turning into a fascist military dictatorship because of capitalism and misinformation campaigns swaying voters etc. etc. How do you (as a USian or not) view what is going to happen in the immediate-to-near future regarding civil liberties & disobedience, especially the current secret police and/or ICE (just getting a big, beautiful budget increase to unbeforeseen heights); and also thinking civil war and outside intervention?

    For me, the current situation seems hopeless for the state. The bipartisan system is in its core a laughable excuse for an actual functioning democracy (then again are there any real democracies in the capitalist world?), as both parties are controlled by the same organizations and lobbyists, with governmental administration occasionally changing hands from one to the other only to unmake what little "progress" the currently "progressives" had made last time they were in the administration, forming but a pittance of what the people actually want. But the current administration seems to be too much akin to the Italian fascists or the German NSDAP of yore, and its attempts to control all media too see-through for some, who mostly seem to be in the bluer (richer and thus more better off) states. I think this stark divide between the population will be the force that rips the nation apart, as most people in the bluer more progressive states probably aren't as big on the secret police appearing unmarked and unannounced and armed, ready to take people away to concentration camps in undisclosed places in foreign nations in unmarked vans as the people of the redder and more conservative states seem to be.

    So the question becomes how will the people react? Civil disobedience probably sounds nice right up until they start gunning those disobeying down, and deploying the National Guard and Marines against them (which I think might be unconstitutional there? not sure though because it happened already). The US Armed Forces apparently have 1.3 million active members (without a draft mind you) and even though there are people in this group who aren't as morally bankrupt as the administration is atm, I think they'd still have enough members positioned around the world in enough places that there isn't a single force in the world to oppose it willingly and easily. I bring this up because if (or when) push comes to shove and the civil disobedience in the blue states becomes too much for DJ Dump and his christofascist capitalism buddies, and they start driving their military might against their own people with increasing force, who will be there to come in to save the (non-militant minded) people? I think the US administration would consider this a declaration of war, and respond to it as such. So as I see it the US is on a surefire highway to the danger zone to Civil War part II: Electric Boogaloo, and in the end will either rip itself apart or pull the entirety of the western (NATO) countries to war with it. So thank god my country just got in! Wouldn't wanna miss this one, boys!

    Anyway post your prophecies on the manifesting destiny of the US below, we'll eventually see who got it right.

    view more: next ›