At a rally in Nebraska Tuesday night, President Trump told his supporters exactly what he thinks about the well-being of the American people.

Trump first said that the price of goods and services, which have gone up thanks to his ill-advised Iran war and tariff policies, were “just a little bit high. It’s a small price to pay for keeping the world safe—keeping our country safe.

“They can take out a city. Let them take, let them take out Los Angeles. Let them take out San Diego. This is a very small price to pay,” Trump said. “And it’s going to be over with very soon. It’s essentially almost over with.”

Conservative activists have argued that Trump didn’t really mean that losing the two cities is a “small price to pay,” but that he was referring to high gas prices. In that generous interpretation, Trump was arguing that his war, which has killed scores of civilians in the Middle East and an estimated 23 U.S. soldiers, is preventing Iran from waging large scale attacks on American cities. But Iran’s targets during the war have been U.S. installations in the Middle East, and it wasn’t targeting American cities before the war either.

California leaders, however, have taken his words at face-value.

Advocating for the mass death of his own citizens?

all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11 points 1 month ago

Los Angeles didn’t start a pointless, unwinnable war with Iran — so why would Iran attack LA?

  • source
  • Aka False flag murder of millions of Americans by the traitors

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I would assume if Iran did have a nuke, they would put it straight up Trump's ass.

  • source
  • [+] 2 points 1 month ago (9 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago* (8 children)

    Ugh… this shit again

    It wasn’t an inside job. It was an inside failure of almost every western intelligence service to act on information they had. It was the result of arrogance and stupidity, not conspiratorial intent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    It was the result of arrogance and stupidity, not conspiratorial intent.

    I think the former serves the latter.

    Conservatives acted very suspiciously before and after 9/11. "We need a new Pearl Harbor," they said in 2000, and got it the next year. They appointed people to the 9/11 commission who deliberately tried to change the report to be less thorough and less accurate. The commission was denied resources and information, and was given a short deadline.

    There is reason to believe Saudi Arabia was involved in planning the attacks, but the US went after Iraq instead, falsely claiming that Saddam Hussein was linked to al-Qaeda and had weapons of mass destruction.

    The US used 9/11 as justification for its "war on terror", which included countless human rights violations including indefinite detention without charge and torture. The privacy-violating PATRIOT Act was introduced and extended repeatedly until 2020. War crimes have been covered up.

    I think the rich are willing and able to use every means at their disposal to retain their power. I think they influence the global narrative and provoke people to act against their own best interests. It's not as simple as saying "Bush did 9/11," but I think there was and still is conspiratorial intent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The fact that, after 25 years, no one takes this bullshit seriously should be enough of an indication that you have been, at best, misled.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    And syrup isn’t sticky.

    That doesn’t mean the Canadians did it, either.

    If you’d like to present some evidence, go on and do that. But it’s been 25 years, and your bullshit story is still just bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 74 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 117 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    treason

    The betrayal of allegiance toward one's own country, especially by committing hostile acts against it or aiding its enemies in committing such acts

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] [S] 30 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593 (2024) (holding that presidential immunity from criminal prosecution presumptively extends to all of a president's "official acts" – with absolute immunity for official acts within an exclusive presidential authority that Congress cannot regulate such as the pardon, command of the military, execution of laws, or control of the executive branch).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    It's still treason. They've just removed judicial/ legal remedies. Leaving only...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    Is campaigning an “official act” though?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    His invitation would be a mix of diplomacy and intell gathering, thus him in his official capacity.

    -His lawyers and the coming SCOTUS opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 81 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    Iran could take out the president, the supreme court, and all of congress. It's a small price to pay.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Much of Congress, sure, unless you're a "both sides" person, in which case fascism adores you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Iran could kill every single politician in the USA, from the most unimportant one to Trump and the world would be a better place due to the USA collapsing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Political violence doesn't solve anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    I consider myself a very left democrat. I'd probably align as a democrat socialist when it comes to policy, taxation, and spending. Both sides are not the same in terms of their policy. I find them to be the same in terms of corruption, although republican politicians are far more corrupt, and the corruption is on a larger scale.

    Today's democrats capitulate to corporate interests far too often, at the expense of their constituents because of lobbying and campaign donations.

    Today's republicans capitulate to corporate interests far too often, at the expense of their constituents because of lobbying and campaign donations, AND they want to take away our rights to abortion, and kill/deport anyone that isn't 100% straight, white enough to cry milk and fart chalk, and/or subscribe to their method of worshiping Jesus Christ. Republicans are also ok with rape, pedophilia, and foreign entities bombing large cities in California. They are truly a basket of deplorables.

    Both sides are not the same, but I do hate both sides, albeit for different reasons. I would shed no tears if they were all wiped out in a catastrophic event, with the exception of Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, Jamaal Bowman, Cori Bush, Greg Casar, Summer Lee, and Delia Ramirez.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    I don't have energy or passion to write a full reply at the moment, but we're probably 90%+ in agreement. Still worth fighting against "both sides" because fascism in power affects human rights way more than establishment (i.e. shitty) Democrats, much less progressives, although one does have to have sufficient numbers to really foment change. But anyway, I pretty much fully agree with ya :)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    I would shake their hand if they did so. The conservatives have kneecapped America with a golf club, and kept doing it ever since the establishment of the Heritage Foundation.

    I want to live in a America that doesn't suck.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Conservatives hate their perceived domestic opposition more than they hate the country they entered into an unprovoked war with.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Conservatives hate their perceived domestic opposition more than they hate the country they entered into an unprovoked war with.

    If you watch the video clip of him saying that, the crowd enthusiastically cheers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago

    On brand for that child rapist.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago

    Just a reminder that that Denmark still has an offer for California, and we would not suggest a foreign power take out any part of it.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago

    I would love to know how one interprets those comments as being somehow related to gas prices. But it’s hard for me to get in that mindset, seeing as my mother refrained from smoking meth while pregnant with me. And what’s really sad is that Iran would never even consider taking out any American city. Because we live in a world where the fucking Ayatollahs are the voice of reason in global politics.

  • source
  • [+] 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago
    [–] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Imagine saying like 15% of the U.S. economy or whatever Cali is is a small price to pay. He is stupid as shit.

    EDIT: I was just guessing but was close, it's apparently 14%.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    I hope Iran takes out the White House and Congress. A small price to pay for a better world.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    i have to admit i didn't have "POTUS totally fine with sworn enemy attacking cities full of people he doesn't like" on my WTF is this timeline bingo card

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 24 points 1 month ago* (4 children)

    i didn’t have “POTUS totally fine with sworn enemy attacking cities full of people he doesn’t like” on my WTF is this timeline bingo card

    I did

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    to be completely fair i'm totally fine with florida falling into the ocean, however non-moron non-climate change-deniers have plenty of time to get out

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    however non-moron non-climate change-deniers have plenty of time to get out

    Some of them do. Some of them are children, and some of them are financially trapped.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Wait, does "POTUS totally fine with virus destroying cities full of people he doesn't like" not count? 'Cause I've had that square on the board filled in for six years already.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    He's wanting a green light nuke and rally the right. Disgusting fucking treasonous criminal.

    He needs to be noosed asap. Or guillotined.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    I would prefer Iran to take out Mar-A-Lago, followed by every conservative leader. Because, let's be frank, the war was caused by those dickheads.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Wtf does Nebraska bring to the economic table? You fuckers need us.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    Even by Republicans standards, he is quite the asshole. And that's saying a lot.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    TREASON is allowing a FOREIGN ENEMY to ATTACK the Country! NOT liking Data Centers!

    -Republicans!

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    This is partly why I dislike when people, particularly on Reddit, dismiss any and all far right talk as Russian bot troll farms.

    This was live in front of real flesh and blood US citizens who cheered.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    He need to be either in prison, or under one. I couldn’t possibly care less which one it is, but one it must be.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Did you ever see that show Hunters? The gist is that a team of Holocaust survivors and their children/grandchildren spent several decades hunting down remaining Nazis that had survived. Long story short; Hitler survived and escaped to Argentina. They find him and catch him and he's put on trial in international court. Ironically, his court-appointed lawyer is a Jew who genuinely tries to do his job and get him to plead insanity. Hitler being Hitler ignores him because he's Jewish and demands to be questioned by the court. He's allowed to take the stand and goes on a rant that guarantees his conviction. He's thrown into a solitary confinement cell in the Hague and spends the rest of his days screaming to nobody because nobody can hear him.

    I'd be happy with Trump getting a similar punishment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)

    I have never heard of that, no. But I kinda want to watch it now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    It was several years ago when I watched it, but it was pretty good. Had al Pacino, Carol Kane, Saul Rubenek and a bunch of other great actors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Where's Harvey Lee Oswald when you need one...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Iran isn't interested in attacking dem states, they'd rather aim for Donald/republicans since their the real aggressors

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 month ago

    Iran isn’t interested in attacking dem states, they’d rather aim for Donald/republicans since their the real aggressors

    That logically makes sense, but I wouldn't expect that subtlety to be recognized by Iran. It's all America. I mean, do we, in mass, recognize the regional differences in opinion from around Iran? No. To the average person, it's all Iran.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    ??? How does this help you Donald ???

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    "conservative activists propagandists" ftfy

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    "Oh, come on, librul! He's just joking!"

    • Some MAGA idiot in Orange county.
  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Ya I'm sure iran would really rather nuke us here in California than Nebraska. We have a huge Iranian population and love them just as much as anyone else. My kid's closest friend is Iranian American and goes to Farsi school on the weekend. Go fuck yourself Nebraska. Keep saluting the Ten Commandments or whatever the hell u ppl do out there.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Nah. Soon that funny caramel guy who cleans the table or the floor in the white house will go boom in front of that Orange Miscarriage.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Tuesday night? Did I time travel or did this happen last week?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I don't think Los Angeles and San Diego will let them though.

  • source