Moira Akers was prosecuted and convicted of the murder of a newborn in 2022. She claims to have given birth to a stillborn baby in her home in Columbia, Maryland, in 2018. Prosecutors doubted Akers’ story, using her online searches for abortion services and lack of prenatal care as evidence of ill intent. But it was a “forensic method” devised in the 17th century that proved key to Akers’…

Source


From Truthout via This RSS Feed.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
16 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 78 points 1 month ago (6 children)

“The hospital physicians attending told the police who had arrived at the scene not to speak to her for at least two hours after surgery because she was put under general anesthesia,” Akers’ lawyer, Debra Saltz, told us in an interview.

“So the police, rather than wait two hours, interviewed her. I think it was approximately an hour and 20 minutes later, they began an interview.”

Saltz challenged the admissibility of the interview in court. But presiding Judge McCrone ruled that Akers “sounded okay” after reviewing a recording of the interview. [emphasis mine]

Who needs practicing anaesthesiologists who've spent years at the bleeding edge of science learning how sedative drugs affect human consciousness when you have Timothy J. McCrone, (now former) judge for the Howard County Circuit Court, who can eyeball a video and say "ah, fuck it"?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Like wtf SIDS is an extremely well known occurence, so what if the baby had air in its lungs? Not to mention any of the methodological issues with this...

    Wouldn't a fucking autopsy be the right call here?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago*

    SIDs isn't a real diagnosis beyond "we can't prove what killed this baby and people generally aren't big fans of infant autopsies to find out it was a unknown heart defect or whatever"

    It's also only applied to babies older than a month, the implication being not to apply it to stillborns or infants that simply never had a chance. That's just not what the label is for.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Holy shit did these people literally use Monty Python logic to convict a woman of murder???

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Fuck sake. Next they'll take the accused to the corpse to see if it 'spits blood' in the presence of the murderer. Old as the practice was, what happened in this Maryland case sounds almost as uninformed and ludicrous.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Bring back phlogiston therapy!

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Bet she wasn't white....I hate this reality

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Not really applicable but sure

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    I think the fact that she had no pre-natal care and was searching for medical information online instead of asking a doctor suggests, to me at least, that she was very much in the lower strata of economic class.

    A wealthier person could have spoken to a doctor about abortions and had the protection of doctor patient confidentiality, rather that having her search for medical information used against her.

  • source
  • parent