And this is why you don't play games that require kernel level anticheat.
post
I would take it
Why do they even have access?
Anti Cheat software is a root kit, they can and do collect everything.
I'm not saying this is impossible, it certainly is possible, and clearing or disabling the TPM is always a good idea on used PC hardware or even new hardware. And I'm not saying I know if that's what actually happened here. But I have to put on my "press F to doubt" hat, and point out that realistically it always seems to turn out that like 95% of the time when someone claims they were "banned for cheating and this is the reason why" no matter how dramatic the story, it turns out they were actually cheating, because the kind of people who compulsively cheat at games are the same kind of people who compulsively cheat their way through life by twisting reality into these wild narratives that sometimes they actually even believe themselves. Riot giving a bunch of detailed information about how their anti-cheat detected this guy seems implausible, and meaningless since they won't unban him anyway. They have nothing to gain from allegedly explaining all that, and if they're unwilling to unban the person they might as well assume it's still the actual cheater they're talking to, and why bother telling them anything at all?
This all sounds like a load of baloney to me. Plausible, believable baloney, but still baloney.
F to doubtβ
π±οΈ Run as Administrator
the following command:
# wmic cpu get serialnumber
Hmm... I've always used
`# wmic bios get serialnumber
The old bat file that company depends no longer works because windows forced update uninstalled wmic, which was the day I learned what wmic was.
I doubt this is true. Hardware bans are an extremely rare occurance. Last time I remember PunkBuster did that, but only for attempts of tampering with the anti cheat software itself
Want $5 bucks for it?
He wouldn't have this problem on Linux.
e: for the Windows users: ('cause he can't play Valorant anyway)
The joke is that you can't play anti cheat games on Linux; This scenario would never be a problem for a Linux user, because they can't use the service in the first place.
How the hell. Does the CPU have a serial number that's visible to the system?
It is unclear how Riot uniquely identifies processors. While CPUs report a hardware ID to the operating system, they only reveal which model it is. A Ryzen 7 5800X3D, for example, is not distinguishable from another Ryzen 7 5800X3D without further ado.
Intelβs Pentium 3 processors from 1999 untypically had unique identifiers. At the time, they caused protests: data protectionists feared that the readable serial number would act like a permanent cookie and make users trackable without gaps.
Riot could create hardware fingerprints for tracking, for example, with a combination of clock behavior and voltages. Each processor behaves slightly differently and can thus be identified.
data protectionists feared that the readable serial number would act like a permanent cookie and make users trackable without gaps.
oh no, our age is showing. quick, cue gen Ξ± brainrot!
brainrot mobile game when?
I pray you don't go to playstores.
We survived shockwaveGame brainrot,
weβll survive J2MErot.
It's bad bad bad bad bad bad bad.
I couldn't care less for mobile games. I don't even use normal Android or PlayStore. My reply was more of a joke. Currently we are also living through AiGame braintrot, especially on PC.
My reply was more of a joke.
same. look up the dates of shockwave & J2ME. I am implying we always had brainrot. The issue is that some choose to be addicted. We choose to circumvent.
I guess that could be done through the TPM 2.0 Endorsement Key (EK), which I believe is stored in the CPU fTPM (and not the motherboard) when dealing with AMD
Does the CPU have a serial number that's visible to the system?
"I didn't read the article that attempts to explain this and explicitly states CPUs don't have a unique ID."
πbe constructive instead insultive:
@artyom@piefed.social please take the time to read the article that further explains how all modern commercial hardware is compromisable & serialized
βI warned you soβ doesn't even remotely describe how I feel about this.
yes, my bloodlust hasn't subsided
If you don't even try informing yourself, why should someone else help you out? Just to encourage your laziness?
"I didn't read the attempts to explain this but I'm going to accuse you of being lazy anyway"
"I didn't read the attempts to explain this"
You're one to talk. lmao
Ironic, isn't it?
Well not really, given nothing they said suggested they didn't read your 6-point excuse to comment on material you haven't read (I did); you just asserted they didn't.
Actually they did. Calling me lazy suggests they did not read it.
Holy fuck the amount of calories you douchenozzles spend on shit arguing shit
Ah what a wonderful contribution you've provided...
You've got no fucking leg to stand on, calling people lazy. What a clown.
I did read this, and i find it is a weak excuse for people who want to blabber about things they do not have put an inkling of thought into.
However, from the studioβs perspective, it would be much easier to write identification hashes into the Trusted Platform Module. Because this TPM sits as a coprocessor directly in the CPU in most PCs, the hash remains when switching to a new PC.
ATPO.
And FPO apparently.
No entries found in UDic
elucidate me π
Apologies. It would seem those are specific for Intel CPUs only. My mistake.
For AMD CPUs there seems to be a unique serial number. It is engraved physically on it, but I have yet to find how to view it through software check.

all 58 comments