all 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 90 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Whats with this passive voice shit? Its chooses to layoff, its not hit by shit

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Thank you!!!!! That is exactly what I was coming here to say. Lets take a look at the C-suite bonus and pay structure and see who got 'HIT' with what. Greedy fucks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 39 points 1 month ago

    New Orleans was hit by hurricane Katrina in 2005. That's a fair characterization of events.

    Disney's CEO is choosing to layoff. Disney is not the unwitting victim of circumstance.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    Disney Employees Hit By Layoffs, A Couple Hundred Workers Cut

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I'd probably phrase it more like

    Disney executes layoffs, over 200 people effected while executives face no consequences for mismanagement

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    It must be in the style guide: Never use Person + active verb + person when talking about what rich people or cops do.

    Disney has initiated layoffs

    involuntary staff reductions

    D’Amaro has overseen multiple rounds of layoffs

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago

    Poor Disney! If only they had made countless billions of dollars on their assorted IP over the last few years then maybe they wouldn't be so poor now that they have to layoff their beloved employees that they can no longer afford to pay.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Yeah but look at the bright side: Paying customers are being served ads now too! LMAO to whoever still pays for that.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    I’m sure a lot of people have been “hit really hard” with the streaming subscriptions they canceled over Disney’s stupid bullshit.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    trying to keep disney+ on life support.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Today’s cuts are said to impact a couple of hundred employees, largely in areas such as tech and HR, which is a smaller number than the two previous rounds of layoffs earlier this year.

    Disney employs around 220-000- 230,000 people. So this is maybe 1% of staff, to put that in perspective.

  • source
  • 5 comments in c/movies@piefed.social view that post
    [–] 28 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    "Hit" by layoffs. Damn layoffs burning the red light and just hitting poor little clueless disney.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Exactly what I opened the comments to come here and say. Are layoffs just a thing that happens to companies? Like a natural disaster?

    "Layoff Katrina just hit Disney, thousands displaced from their homes"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    trying to maintain the MCU slop generator, Disney+ no doubt.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    The number of people able to afford to consume their product (and any other non-essential product) will continue to decrease as a result of these and similar decisions. Prices or ad revenue will need to increase for the people who can still pay for it in order to continue to maximize profits. Eventually the product hits a price (or annoyance) point which too few wish to pay and their revenue will collapse. People could accelerate this process by voting with their money. Withholding or paying is our individual vote for or against a corporate entity.

  • source