So surprised the Supreme Court would allow this. /s

Let me guess: 6-3 vote? Edit: yup. Just read. 6-3.

Noncitizen voting is extremely rare. All states are required to conduct voter roll list maintenance under federal law, and states already have processes to identify any noncitizens who do accidentally make it onto the voter rolls

Definitely something to end an article on instead of leading with it. 🙄

There's a provision in the law where they can't do any mass purges within 90 days of an election. So this ruling is limited to "individualized queries" for the rest of the 2026 cycle. But you can expect it to be a much bigger deal in the 2028 cycle if it doesn't get overturned.

(This is a situation where Congress has the power to change the law. Hint, hint.)

Check and double check your voter registration.

Why would Trump be purging voters? Is he in charge of state-run voter rolls now?

As the Trump administration encourages […]

Ah- he isn’t. Bullshit headline.

Even when so, the voter should have enough time to appeal before election day.

In court papers, Solicitor General D. John Sauer said that the district court’s ruling “threatens the integrity of upcoming elections” by preventing the government from responding to state requests to verify the citizenship of potential voters.

anyway:

Noncitizen voting is extremely rare. All states are required to conduct voter roll list maintenance under federal law, and states already have processes to identify any noncitizens who do accidentally make it onto the voter rolls.

So States can suck it when it comes to election? /s

On election night they will just tell every registered Democrat they're not allowed to vote.

Datenbank, bitte.

Countdown to fascism: X-1