all 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 43 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In the upper photo it's more like 15 people at most. The inefficiency of cars astounding once you actually start paying attention to it. Moving to cars for every transit mode is in the 10 ten worst decisions humanity has ever made.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I see 7 people getting a coffee in the top photo.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Honestly seems more of a critique of grind culture we've got in the US. Used to be you had time in the morning or afternoon to enjoy a cafe but now you've got a job you can't afford to quit in a town you can't afford to live in and need to drive an hour to get there with gas you can't afford... that last part because there are no trains anymore, too.

    Yeah, halfway through that, I admit it's also still bullshit car culture nonsense, too. Lol

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    People absolutely stop by coffee shops to get something to go in an urban context too. But the queueing that happens inside one of them, maybe even spilling out of the premises, still requires very little area and is pretty benign in an urban context. Especially if you wind up having a little chat with someone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    That's the thing for me. You take away any comeraderie (sp?) and societal benefit from this style of capitalism. Nobody knows their neighbors anymore. It's all just a grind and you wind up selfish because you see people as NPCs. Even just a chat with someone for 10-15 mins would give people some sense of empathy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Yeah, I think a lot of us frequently hear from suburbanites about how urban living is all "in a pod", but then … they really should check their mirrors. Throwing stones from glass- and metal boxes, and all that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    I get it to a certain point. Just because I live next to you, doesn't mean we're friends. If you've ever had an intrusive neighbor you'd understand. But at the same time, at least getting to know someone builds community, even if accidentally. We'd be a much closer community with more caring and empathy if we were forced to exit our bubbles for even a small amount of time. But selfishness is built into American culture.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Nah that top photo is at most 10 people getting a coffee.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago
    [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Even the architecture of the Starbucks is so inhuman. It looks like a fireplace in an AirBnB that's just a TV that shows a video of a fire.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    I dunno, sharing a single coffee with 30 other people sounds like a pain whether everybody's in cars or not.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Coffee too expensive to get and not enough money to enjoy not just coffee, life as well.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Is that the Inception cafe?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I mean I agree, but have any of you been to a busy cafe or restaurant? Listening to 30 people inevitably shouting over each other while I try to drink coffee isn't my idea of enjoyment.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Personally, I dont want to sit with that many people. Get in my car and drive away from them as far as I can

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 57 comments in c/fuckcars@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 80 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    There are 15 people at best getting coffee in that first image

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    The average Starbucks does not have a throughput that should legally allow them to have a drive though.

    It takes like 5 minutes per car and one near me used to regularly back up on to the road and block the adjacent parking lot.

    It just doesn’t make sense to go to the start bucks drive through ever, so I don’t know who is foolish enough to form these lines.

    Notwithstanding that Starbucks is an awful corporation with either subpar coffee or comparable sugar levels to ice cream.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Back before I kicked my Starbucks habit (and my car habit), I used to go to one with a drive through every day. The drive-through line was always backed up like the one in the picture. I always got my coffee quicker by parking my car, walking inside and ordering. Once I could order through the app, it was no contest. I was out the door in the same time it took drive-through people to move up 2 spots.

    Even at the height of my car dependence, I never could understand the appeal of drive-throughs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 58 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    That's more like 10 people on the first image

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    I was gonna say, these people moat likely dirve by themselves. And probably live less than a km away

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Eh, don't be too sure about only living a km away. I know growing up the nearest grocery store was about 12 km away. The nearest place to get coffee was further away.

    Fast forward to today the nearest grocery store is only 1.5 km away, but there's no sidewalk and the road is so narrow that you can't walk on the shoulder. You could ride a bike, but there's no bike lane so you'll be hoping the whole way that no one runs you over.

    The car issue is a lot more complex than "American Lazy LOL" it's an infrastructure issue that was set in to effect almost 50 years before I was born. Designed to serve the car manufacturers and to sell cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    And to keep out icky poor people and brown people from suburban neighborhoods. Don’t forget that part. In fact that was a large part of why the car manufacturers were able to have infrastructure built this way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    The nearest Starbucks to me is a little over ~3km and I live in a major metropolitan area in the US.

    My work is ~6.4km away and the Starbucks would be roughly on the way. It takes ~15 minutes for me to get to work by car. It would take ~2 hours to walk there, ~35 minutes to bike (weather permitting) and ~1 hour by bus.

    Stopping at the drive thru on my way would still take less time overall and I’d have coffee. I don’t do it because Starbucks’s coffee is trash.

    I’d love to not have to drive so much but infrastructure changes take a long time to happen so until alternative transportation is competitive I’ll be driving.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Biking for half an hour sounds fine to me if infrastructure is ok.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Sure, except ~3months out of the year I’d show up to work soaked in sweat and a different ~3 month period I’d be riding through accumulated snow or ice.

    They do plow but usually not the bike lanes and the paths (what few there are) aren’t ever cleaned until midday.

    Ideally I’d work from home, and I’d have a small electric car big enough for two humans and two medium dogs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I counted 18, but that's only outside

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    My main takeaway here is that people drinking Starbucks are not enjoying their coffee

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago*

    I live in a country where drive through isn't that common. But when a huge local e-shop introduced pickup by drive through, I decided to try it out. I tried it twice. First time it was relatively empty so I though "Hah, that's actually pretty convinient and fast". Second time it was pretty packed and I thought "Omg this must be the stupidest idea ever. What am I doing here? I'm sitting in an artificial traffic jam which I literally can't leave while employees handle a fraction of customers at once. And why exactly? So I don't leave my car?"

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    USA vs the world.

    ?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    One unstated thing that helps create conditions for the above:

    The people above pictured don't have robust unions and labor laws that save you from being annihilated for being late not early enough one time.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    What's that area surrounding the cafe called?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Hopefully, we'll see more and more street reclamation, with cars pushed to parking lots and downtown streets reserved for walking, bicycling, and the occasional small electric vehicle for those who need them. Local laws need to change, so we all need to vote in local elections. Voter turnout for local elections is abysmal in most cities and towns.

    We used to have places like Der Wienerschnitzel and Taco Bell with tables outside, but you still had to drive there and park. I don't know if new places are built like this anymore, probably not many. The last gasp of this sort of thing in America.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Surely the bottom picture should be an Italian piazza. French coffee culture is not much to write home about (they lean towards robusta rather than arabica, as that’s what their colonies grew) and the coffee you get in a pretty café in the touristy parts of Paris is going to be mediocre at best.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    Drive thru coffee shops should be illegal.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    Road adjacent coffee stands without seating are probably the most common business here in vietnam, it works because its only for pedestrians, bicycles, and motorbikes, I've never seen a car stopped at one, blocking traffic.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    God forbid I get a coffee on my way to work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Is there no coffee machine at your house not at work?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    Espresso machines are very uncommon at homes and buisnesses in the US.

    If someone is waiting in a Starbucks drive thru for a drip coffee they are insane.

    No doubt someone does this, but the majority are getting something a bit more complex. Not necessarily good since it is still Starbucks after all, but still

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I make my own coffee at home, but this whole thread about shaming people for going to a coffee shop is crazy to me. Even if they want drip coffee, who cares?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago

    Well drip coffee is easy to make at home, i.e the equipment is cheap. An espresso machine and a grinder cost a lot more money, making getting overpriced Starbucks coffee a much more attractive proposition than with drip.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Does Europe have the bikini barista stands like we have out here? Those are Starbucks biggest competition.

    Well, that and unions.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    As soon as you land.... leaving the imperial core.... it is ssoooooo much better.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    In all fairness, Starbucks in Europe even in more car centric countries are a lot more like the bottom one.

    I don't think I've ever seen a drive-in to get coffee around these parts, and I've lived in several European countries.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    You are making a point, just not the one you intended to make. The first coffee shop is selling to people who want a nice place to slowly enjoy their cup of coffee. The second coffee shop is targeting commuters who want to grab a coffee to drink while they are driving into work.

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (10 children)

    One is a city (Paris) as a tourist hotspot, the other is a rural area. One seems to be people getting coffee to and from work (the shadows make it look early morning, so more likely to), the other requires they have time to enjoy. I don't really see it as a very effective argument.

    Tourist spot will always beat rural spot in terms of pure aesthetics - that's why it's a tourist spot. The streets around Cafe Palais Royal aren't even that pedestrian-centric, they are just small Paris streets with small sidewalks whose streets have yet to be really pedestrianized.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago

    A local cafe near Me has a seating area inside to enjoy a coffee with friends, and a window facing outside to get a coffee on the go. There's no car access, you have to walk there. There are always customers, many of them very busy, and it's a much nicer place to be than this picture of a Starbucks.

    Also I don't think this is rural. There's a six lane stroad visible on the right. This is a city. It just looks rural, because the Americans spread everything out so much. I don't think all these shiny SUVs are on their way to a goat farm. I think the Americans are sprawling everything out with hectares upon hectares of concrete and asphalt and then claiming to be rural.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    The cafe in Paris is indeed extremely central and I would assume also pretty touristy. Ironically enough it is on a fairly car centric road.

    All of that does not change the fact that modern transit/bike/pedestrian neighbourhoods, built for locals, not tourists, are much more like the Parisian cafe than the drive through hell above, that includes bakeries for your to-go demands.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    The US drive-thru urban sprawl hellscape is pretty unique to North America. The bottom picture didn't have to be central Paris, you could find a similar motif in countless places.

    You present it as if the bottom picture is the unusual one, when in reality it is the top one for almost all the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    when in reality it is the top one for almost all the world.

    I didn't know Cafe Palais Royal were so prolific! I mean, if you want to use bad examples because they are more photogenic, it's up to you. Plenty of less iconic shops with pedestrianized streets that image could have come from, sure. I think you have more of a point with the "urban rural sprawl hellscape" in US rural planning, but a place with more people density is going to have more of a soul regardless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    You don't need that many people to have cafés with outside seating. Basically speaking, if your town is big enough to have a pedestrian zone it's big enough to have those. Heck, my hometown lacks a café or a pedestrian zone but does have a bakery with outside seating and it's rural enough that you can smell the pig stables from any point in town.

    It's more a question of whether you're willing to dedicate space for people to be outside (rather than just traveling from A to B) and whether people actually want to be outside. Culture matters a lot here. Where I'm from people will happily use outside seating right next to a busy arterial road because sitting outside when the weather is nice is seen as desirable.

    As for urban vs. rural, a six-lane road practically screams "urban sprawl"; that's the kind of road generally associated with major population centers in Europe. I know that many municipalities in the States like to overbuild their car infrastructure to the point where you can walk nowhere and then wonder why there's so much traffic. But from a European perspective that very much looks like a commercial zone on the outskirts of a big city.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Every cafe in Australia has this same arrangement. Tables spreading outside, crammed inside, fucken amazing coffee and often tons of people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 month ago

    since there are café, like this one in every other corner of Paris... and it is not a Paris things, all city/village in Europe have a decent number of café even in the less tourist area ever. A 2k habitant village, will have its central café. The moment the café goes away, is usually a sign, the village is dead

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    You know that South Park clip where San Francisco is filled with dangerous levels of Smug and people who live there are addicted to smelling their own farts?

    Completely unrelated, but for some reason I thought of that. Neither of these images would be me.

  • source