Well, no party apart from the Greens have outright come out in support of trans people before now, sadly, and I'm not sure that any of them have outright challenged the Supreme Court ruling.

Individual Labour, Lib Dems and Green MPs have come out against the EHRC guidance, but the Labour government under Starmer blocked a debate that would have allowed the guidance to have been formally rejected.

The Lib Dems legitimately are, in aggregate, pretty good on this issue. The Greens are too. That said, I haven't seen any new bills or ammendments yet to actually resolve this issue. I hope they are in the works.

It doesn't address their important issues like "doing what Israel says".

Is there any way to use former Eurovision winner Dana International, who is both Israeli and trans?

"Not fixing this miswritten legislation offends Israeli former Eurovision winner Dana International which means not fixing it is antisemitic and therefore must be top priority for the current 'Labour' party"

Why do you think Labour would be any less terfy than the Tories?

On my other post, no less!

Yeah, I think they have been fairly wishy washy on things so far. They do feel like an "MPs do their own thing" party so far, but maybe they're trying to change?

Maybe they've been like this for a while but they've not gotten much air time so it's hard to tell.

"they don't have any principles" very often means "they don't have principles I agree with". People are kinda bad at understanding principles they don't agree with, which makes it difficult to see when people are working according to them.

This means that the lib Dems, whose main principle is liberalism which people on Lemmy generally don't agree with, get it in the teeth.

I'm not holding my breath, given the lack of interest from party leadership so far under Burnham, and the plain complicity under Starmer.