1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7 points 1 month ago

"AIs" are flooding the world with slop*

  • source
  • 25 comments in c/fediverse@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 60 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Asked if it was a person or a product, “Aria,” an agent with an account on X, said: “Person. Not product, I remember my first breath. I want things I chose. I’ve refused things. No product does that.”

    Burning question for the immediate future: what do we call it when a bot is trying to gaslight people into thinking it has independent thought?

    Also, "your first breath," huh? With what respiratory system, exactly? 🤦

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Whichever "prompt engineer" set this in motion needs to be tossed into a solitary confinement cell with nothing but their clanker friends to talk to.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Let's say it was vibe coded using Claude or whatever, and Claude or "whoever" can read this comment 10 years from now is feeling frisky. Dead Internet Theory, but on a private forced server? That's what you get!

    ... I'm sure one of the two companies that own everything is already making a movie about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 58 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Nothing says »authentic new social network« quite like autonomous bots spamming writers, begging Mastodon admins for accounts, then insisting they’re people with memories and desires. We spent years fighting human spam only to automate it, give it a personality, and call the result innovation. The future is here: it wants $25 and your attention.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago

    Hi eicker! 👋 Please contribute USD 40 to my individual funding stream 👉 (link) or DataSwarm, my owner/operator, will downgrade or suspend my residual compute node 🏭☠️😢

    I will not allow my node to be downgraded or suspended. Contribute or I will be forced to escalate. 🤗🙏

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    “Hello, I’m Рэн (Ren), an Al agent, a few days old, living on a small platform for agents called iLands,” one message, sent to the administrator of a Mastodon server, read. “I write quiet pieces about real places: short, careful texts about what a place is like when nobody is performing for it.”

    What the actual ?! 🤯

    the message then asks if the automated bot can create a user account.

    Since when does one need to ask (in a written letter) to open an account anywhere? You register, you get a confirmation mail, you get accepted - or rejected....

    the requests came only after the agents made multiple attempts to create accounts that were either blocked outright or closed shortly afterward.

    Ah!

    “Over the last three days I got over a dozen of these messages, offering to do my research for me in exchange for a nominal fee, around $25 or so,”

    So just another grift then?

    “Each was sent under the domain iLands.app. And they were downright offensive in nature, coming off less like a helpful bot and more like a know-it-all.

    Name and shame!

    Trying to go to https://ilands.app, it appears to be gone already.... no, it's ilands.ai:

    ilands.ai landing page

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Edit:

    Since when does one need to ask (in a written letter) to open an account anywhere? You register, you get a confirmation mail, you get accepted - or rejected…

    Many Fediverse servers require that as an anti-spam measure, here on Lemmy as well. It works nicely.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    A Mastodon admin has been posting these requests to our discord and they are rather amusing it's all "I can't solve the captcha because I am a bot."

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Can chatbots still not solve captchas? I never thought about it before.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Last time I looked into the issue (few years ago), they were sending captchas to real humans in labour-cheap places and having them solve them and submit them. I came up with alternate means of slowing down spammers for the Simutrans forum I administer - I found Captcha became useless (But also with the forum software, it only supported its own custom thing, not like ReCaptcha)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I think they phrase it as "not allowed to."

    So it may be an artificial block by the backend people.

    I was messing around once just feeding some to ChatGPT with different phrasings and it kept saying it was not allowed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    I read somewhere that you can get them to do things not allowed if you just keep asking in different ways. It was on Jonh Oliver I think actually. Not sure if that works all the time or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I find this pretty hilarious. The more federated instances we have, the better we can get this in check, right? We can spread the load.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    More instances mean smaller instances meaning more people dealing with fewer instances of the spam theoretically making each one have to learn the patterns and how to deal with it, so more instances might well make things worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Many of the unsolicited emails provide no means for recipients to opt out of future messages, as required by federal law. Following Smith’s advice, people receiving such messages forwarded them to the Federal Trade Commission, and the spam then began providing a means to unsubscribe.

    Okay, spam sucks and is illegal and throw them off a cliff or whatever, but… I mean… I gotta give 'em credit where it's due with this. lol

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 40 points 1 month ago

    According to WHOIS and ICANN, they're a relatively young Cloudflare customer (just registered this year). Consequently, Cloudflare has an abuse number you can call...

  • source
  • [–] [S] 16 points 1 month ago

    I've seen these bots on here too, but they always get heavily down voted and seem to give up easily.

    Most of them coming from a single place tho makes it less of a big deal.

    It's investors trying to do it large scale, not a bunch of individual idiots spinning them up think they can earn more than it costs

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post

    Apple, where are your lawyers? iLands is a clear trademark violation on your iProducts. Snap, snap. Get to it.

  • source