Starts to feel like a wave of this kind of BS is hitting the world.

top 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 13 points 1 month ago

From now on, I deem them to be known as, "PERVVISION"

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    I get that they are totally sus, especially in this case, but.....are the glasses the MAIN issue here? It feels like he's just a person who needs to get his ass beat in general.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    How is this pervwear not the main issue

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Crashing out on customers, threatening to fight the husband, not giving back ID's, yelling at employees who try to return said property, etc. The glasses are a cherry on a shit sundae.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The GM's behaviour is one issue. The pervglasses are also an issue though and should be addressed first as they make people feel violated in a way the GM's behaviour might not.

    I have no doubt this creep was taking photos of the female customer's ID prior to being able to use Meta's pervglasses to streamline their process of creeping on customers.

    I would say the unchecked power the GM has had made them feel entitled and lead to them using the pervwear at work.

    Report the behaviour of the GM to local law enforcement, and have them confiscate the recordings etc, then fire the GM for wearing the pervglasses against company policy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    and the perv security cameras all uploading to the cloud ?

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    What a weirdly written article. Reads like the disjointed ramblings of a teenager. That being said, someone should beat the shit out of the general manager and break his perv glasses

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The comments on that story are fucking misogynistic as hell

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    When everyone is naked then nobody is

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago*

    This seems like an AI slop. Not an article at all but a catchy headline and story.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    video evidence is good protection against false accusations

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 39 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 82 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    While the glasses are definitely a problem, this seems to be more about the general manager just being an utter cunt.

    “At this point, my friend’s husband’s getting frustrated, and he’s like, ‘You need to give me my ID back,’” Marilyn said. “The GM threatens to call the cops on my friend’s husband and threatens to ban him.”

    "OK, call the cops." is what they should have said.

    which resulted in her considering other gyms entirely.

    Considering!?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    “OK, call the cops.” is what they should have said.

    If you are ever in a situation that you need the cops; it is almost always in your best interest to be the one who calls. Cops are dumb AF and will blindly believe the reporting party unless things are extremely obvious otherwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Yup, the answer is always, "don't worry, I'll call them for you." But only if you absolutely have to call the cops. Otherwise, don't ever call the cops.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Yeah, the looney manager was clearly bluffing. I reckon withholding your driving licence would justify calling them. That can't be legal. I'm kind of baffled why they left it with him in the first place.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 1 month ago

    did AI write that article? what a mess of words

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 1 month ago

    I don’t think newsbreak expects people to actually move past the headline and read the article because most of it is incoherent bullshit.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    now we have fucking start putting signs to ban recording glasses too? fucking hell just be a decent human being so we don't have to drown in rules.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Generally recording at gyms is already prohibited, but this was the gym manager using them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Yeah but soon users will start using them too and when confronted they will say they didn't know and then owners will have to start putting up signs because there is always some people that just lack the basic amount of common sense that is required to grasp this (on top of those who disobey it with bad faith).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    Most gyms already have a "no photographs/videographs" sign, don't they?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The source for this article is not great. Maybe OP should consider that before sharing it here.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 12 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I'm not sure how the glasses provide protection. Seems like corporate must get a constant stream of complaints and accusations about this bozo but recordings of him being such an ass would not really be much of a defense.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Cause the manosphere likes to tell every man that if they haven't been falsely accused of something, it's just a matter of time. So if they record everyone constantly, then they can "prove" that it was just a misunderstanding.

    Of course, if the accusation is that they're been a creep and recording people without consent....

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    The title isn't even accurate to what happened

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I saw an article the other day about women in Spain not sunbathing topless anymore because of all the "nudify" apps and pervert glasses. Are gyms going to be next? And I mean "going to the gym", not "working out topless".

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    The gym already has security cameras, the fuck does he mean the glasses are for his "protection"?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    I'd imagine that in that job—if you're not a perfectly fit young dude or a woman—there's a lot of accusations of "being a creep."

    Imagine you're the guy working that job and someone complains that there's a mess in the women's locker room. What do you do?

    You ask a woman if there's anyone else in there, maybe shout that you're coming in to clean it up, etc. Then you walk into the women's locker room and someone—anyone—sees a man walking into the women's locker room. BAM! Instant creep status.

    Are Meta's glasses the answer? Fuck no! But I understand the "I need protection from accusations" argument.

    What's the alternative? Cameras in the locker room? Hidden cameras?

    The guy probably thought that the glasses were big, ugly, and obvious (because they are) so no one could complain that they didn't know they could be recorded in that guy's presence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    What about a simple camera watching the floor with automatic deletion of data after 48 hours? Why should fucking META of all companies and the garbage manager have unlimited access to this material instead of being stored in a way that doesn't fuck all clients over?

    Why do you have such insecurites that need a fucking all encompassing nanny in form of an abusive GM?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I assume he doesn't actually have access to the business cameras because he's just an employee of a much larger organization.

    Example: I work for a large organization and I do not have access to any cameras anywhere. I wouldn't even know how to request it!

    Also, the recordings need to last a lot longer than 48h. A month makes more sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Imagine you’re the guy working

    Idk, An employee entering whatever gender toilets to clean it isn't gonna be seen as creepy imho, unless they're being actively creepy, like by recording videos with creepers' glasses. I mean, menployees clean women's toilet all the time and womenployees also clean men toilets.

    I can't believe many if any business is currently paying gender-specific cleaners for gendered toilets. An employee would just grab that yellow rolling cleaning cart and deal with the thing and move on. It's a scenario that happens literally everyday everywhere unless the place doesn't clean their toilets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The difference here is that your typical janitorial staff will look like janitorial staff. This guy is just a generic manager (a uniform change when cleaning would be a good idea though).

    The other issue is that most businesses don't have locker rooms; they're just bathrooms.

    A bathroom has stalls where you can't see them whereas a locker room will often have naked or nearly naked people just walking about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    You don't go into an opposite gender bathroom to clean without propping the door open and putting a sign up stating that it's being cleaned. You don't want to be in a stall cleaning something up, while someone else walks in and starts changing without noticing you in there.

    Heck, even if it's a same gender, they often do that so they can take care of the whole job quickly without getting interrupted.

    Recording while walking around in the bathroom/locker room is never and has never been the answer to any problem that has ever existed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Call them creeper glasses.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    “He’s like, ‘Hey, you know, what happened with my wife earlier?’ The general manager then responded, saying, ‘Do you wanna get bonk with me?’  Like, do you wanna fight?” she recalls.

    Is this what passes for a manager these days?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    I feel like stupid is consistent. Someone who is stupid will wear these glasses, and also act like the manager in this story.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    I have a hard time believing this story. The woman claims she brought her friend in on a guest pass but then when there's an issue, that friend's husband appears in the story out of nowhere and happend to be there working out at the exact same time under his own membership? The claimed over-the-top responses by the manager and the fact that she then deleted her post makes this all very fishy.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    From now on, I deem them to be known as, "PERVVISION"

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Dickhead with glasses for no real reason vrs victim content creator

    Trash TV

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/technology@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Wow. That's like a super badly written article.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/DeMeta@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 16 points 1 month ago

    The manager with the glasses claimed recording was for his protection, for anyone confused about the wording.

    The husband should have backed out of the situation and called the cops. It's a rare situation that cops are a good solution, but this is one of them. The minute a cop walks through the front door, the manager will find the ID. That is, if you can get a cop to show up for this at all. You'd need to emphasize that the manager was threatening to start a fight, I suppose. Also, I'd love to see the cop ask to watch the recording of the incident. Fucking fool thinks the glasses are for his protection, that's not how it works.

    Finally, if he actually needs a camera "for his protection" there's no reason to use pervert glasses, he can just mount an obvious camera and put up a sign, as has been done for decades. "Smile, you're on Candid Camera!", although that reference is lost on anyone under 30 now.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    You know, the specific situation aside, because fuck that guy; but I kinda get why someone would want something to serve as a body cam. There's benefits to it, particularly if you're in public a lot.

    Yeah, it's not fucking cool the way the glasses do it, but I still get the use case. It's just a shame it's impossible to use something like that and be privacy friendly

  • source