Hey I dunno, perhaps you can explain how Harper's inclusion at this fire sale of public assets makes you "happy"

Don’t waste your breath trying to reason with him. The guy spent 24 hours crying that everyone in this thread is a "Carney cultist," and the second someone brings up marginalized people, he unironically starts running PR for Pierre Poilievre.

He doesn't actually care about policy or vulnerable people. He’s just so desperate to win an internet argument that he’ll happily whitewash the CPC's social conservatism to keep his tantrum alive.

Poilievre, to the best of my knowledge, has not indicated he would re-open the abortion debate, ban Muslims or implement anti-trans legislation.

But the whole problem with this pile-on is that this event has nothing to do with Poilievre, he's just the handy trope that Liberals self-soothe with when they have to face the fact that Carney is a monster.

Carney, who is in power, laughed at Trump "joking" about murdering crews of fishing boats with drones, cheered the start of the US-Israeli strikes on Iran, and refuses to condemn Israel's genocide of Palestinians.

He did not push back against the US ending the 'X' gender marker on Nexus cards, which was called out by many trans folks as a failure to stand up for trans rights.

Regardless, slashing public services will always hit marginalized folks the hardest, so it's a bit rich to imply that the PM who is making the largest cuts in modern history is somehow a friend to minorities and queer folks.

The fact that you're saying people agree with me so I should be less "abrasive", while simultaneously telling me I'm wrong about Carney, is also pretty telling.

Carney has already made multiple concessions for nothing in return, and poilievre has not indicated that he would have signed whatever it was that was put on the table. Carney's environmental and fiscal policy are indistinguishable from the Build Canada and O&G demands, which Poilievre would have also been aligned with. Please try again