all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 36 points 1 month ago (6 children)

macOS has been able to do this for over 20 years. Nice of Microsoft to catch up now that nobody wants to use the windows ever.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -18 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Let me know when macos catches up in almost all other aspects, since nobody wants to use a mac ever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    since nobody wants to use a mac ever

    Statements like this remind me just how utterly removed from the reality of tech the average Lemmy user is, lol. People fuckin love macs, unless there's a joke I'm missing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Shit, with the M2 chip (and I guess later versions), I saw tech people I would never have imagined as Mac users jumping over to Apple.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    They are just prepping for putting everyone on subscription based thin clients.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    If only we could do this in linux

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I think it is possible, but without a lot of funding for uptime and bandwidth it'd be a bit impractical for most distros.

    Plus, could bring up privacy/security concerns if the hosting address/device gets compromised in any way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    How so? This is basically a net install procedure, which operates right out of most distros package system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I've never actually done a network OS install, but aren't those generally a "local" network install, ie the file is on another computer you or another admin control? Grabbing the file from somewhere else might open the door for a third party to provide their own ISO

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    You're thinking PXE/netboot, which netinstall disks are often used for, but you can use them independently of netboot.

    Generally you have a minimal disk or recovery partition that initiates boot and offers the package manager, basic file and disk utilities, and a script to install a list of important packages. Basically nothing else. A handful of distros offer them, but they're easy to make too. I usually have one in a partition alongside by boot partition. This is very similar to the distros that offer a "recovery" boot option.

    The point is that instead of downloading a static version of the OS at 2GB+ these days, you have a tiny boot disk that downloads all the latest and greatest versions of the files you need, or allows you to fix breakages. This is what MacOS and these Linux distros have been offering for years.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Now I just need you to go fuck yourself.

    Wait, that thing already did..

  • source