Scientists are the ones who figured out that dinosaurs had feathers. Whenever science is proven wrong, it’s with more/better science.
post
Shaved rabbit:


Look at those lil ‘staches! That’s the best thing I’ve seen all day
Is this a certain type of rabbit or is it normal to shave them while leaving a moustache?
What the animal's skeleton looks like. Or How the animal's skeleton looks.
Check out the coffee table book, All Yesterdays. It's half reinterpretations of known fossils, half artist renderings of contemporary animals based only on their skeletons. We're obviously misinterpreting a lot of creatures going just off their skeletons and we'll never know how they really appeared.
As I recall, this is from the skeleton of a contemporary species of monkey, as an example:

That's the most foul, cruel, and bad-tempered rodent you ever set eyes on! He'll do you up a treat, mate.
Oh my god wait does this mean T-Rex was a cutie-wootie-rootie-patootie? 🥹
Just in case though... let's prepare the holy hand granade... juuuuust in case...
But to which number you have to count?
Their spines are fascinating. They're designed to store a lot of potential energy and release it in short bursts.
Rabbits can fuckin' move, and the biomechanics behind why is absolutely enthralling.
Look, all I'm saying is we have no proof that the dinosaurs didn't drive cars.
Artist/authors John Conway and C. M. Kosemen have a book called All Yesterdays about this subject.
This has always been the one thing that has always bug me with the creation of dinosaurs in book, tv, movies etc. If you look at the skulls of hippos or elephants, they look far different than the actual living animal.
we used to have bunnies and ducks and one time we were cleaning up the bunny place and transferred rabbits to a nearby coop. The ducks gathered around it and started quacking at bunnies in this bully manner the ducks do - and then one of the ducks stuck their head into the coop and mama bunny fucked up this motherfucker and turned the coop upside down in the process. that duck got the scarface nickname as a result.
@pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org this doesn't alarm you?
It's
"What * * like" (What it looks like)
OR
"How * *" (How it looks)
It's never
"How * * like"
How is this so fucking hard to get right.
All Todays
Just to add context, there is a good book called All Yesterdays about how earlier assumptions of dinosaur appearances based on fossil records have been challenged over time by new evidence. A lot of the artists who have developed visual recreations of dinosaurs in the past were working under assumptions of what dinosaurs were supposed to look like. But skeletons alone aren't always the best reference to use to base appearance off of, because soft tissue (lost to time) can often contain the most iconic aspects of a species.
So just to riff on that idea, the book contains a section called "All Todays" in which artists take modern animal skeletons we are familiar with and recreate them as if they were dinosaurs. So you end up with these gaunt creatures that are missing distinct features like ears, noses, fur/features, and coloration.
No room for wings? What if they found them elsewhere and placed them thinking this were a flying mammal?
I am convinced that dinosaurs looked completely different than is being guessed with their skeletons.
Look, lizards are lizards. They had other priorities than looking cute back then. Still have.

cuuuuuutie

top 72 comments