The author mentioned someone switching from Firefox to Vivaldi because Firefox got on twitter, while Vivaldi is already on twitter. I see people make these same kind of brain-dead attacks on Firefox all the time, I don't get it. They just really want to hate Firefox for some reason. Like I heard someone say once that they switched to Chrome because they didn't like Firefox pushing AI. Are you kidding me?!
post
Use Zen Browser if you still want Firefox based browsing with the better ergonomics; No AI, tracking or telemetry included.
Is it FOSS?
How is this different to Firefox? Vertical tabs, containers (workspaces), tab previews (glance).
Looks interesting but I can't figure out what makes this different to what I can already do in Firefox.
It is different in that it breaks every few releases. Otherwise Firefox is sufficient if vertical tabs is the aim. I used zen for over a year before I just got tired of the constant breaking.
Zen devs were incredibly bad about messing with my workflows that I had setup for Zen. So much so that I eventually just stopped updating the app and moved back to Firefox to let them get their goals together.
I use Zen for small things like research and whatnot, but Firefox will always be the only browser I use for serious stuff like banking and bills.
Zen is better these days, but the fact I can't get rid of the spaces crap really irks me. I don't need it, and don't want it, but it is a "core part" of their ethos so I am stuck with it. I just renamed it to ... and stopped worrying about it as much. Still recommend giving it a shot for smaller stuff, but definitely not banking and the like.
still breaks. I'm not a fan of it.
I do like Floorp though. slightly bit more customization, fairly solid Japanese dev team that doesn't release something until everything is rock solid so you know updates aren't going to break anything. I can't even recall the last time Floorp broke if ever.
I stick with zen because of spaces. I have a few, e.g. common browsing, work or serious topics, finances, shopping. Each of them I assigned default containers that they will run. And each if them have different pinned tabs related to the spaces.
It's been so long since I switched that I honestly forgot how Firefox base is. I think before I switched I used sideberry to do all that spaces thing but zen is more integrated feeling.
There's just something that hits it for me that it's indispensable for me.
I've been contemplating the switch in the past few days. How long have you been using it? What are some pain points that you had?
Been using zen browser for quite some time. I use a session saver add-on and that one works weirdly due to how Zen has spaces and how that works. The way I understand zen's spaces is like they are browser sessions that can be run simultaneously. Each of them have their own pinned tabs for example, can have default containers they open in, on top of the universal whole browser pinned tabs they call essentials tabs; that's limited to 12 for now.
Sideberry and tree style tabs might not work as you expect because of the changes the zen team made
Just use Waterfox instead
Waterfox is nice
I am not in the AI==bad camp because I believe in nuance. I see a lot of people shit on Firefox for integrating LLM-related features. What the blog post points out and people fail to recognize is that if Mozilla stopped maintaining Firefox, almost all of its forks would die. People make similar arguments about Canonical and Ubuntu. Would these people pay Mozilla or Canonical for their work? The corporate investors do. I'm not saying I agree with it all, but that's how it works.
Would these people pay Mozilla or Canonical for their work?
I think we know the answer to this.
Mozilla? Maybe, but they need to step it up to be worth paying. They were captured by Google supporting them for too long and need to break from the "Yes, Daddy!" dipshittery. Dumping slopboth trash into everything while my SSD replacement is 6x what it was last time I checked just makes me want to slap you. Especiallyh if it's bloody pointless, and for those who want that crap it can run via a bookmarked site or as an extenion not part of the core fucking browser.
Canonical? Fuck no! Not only is Ubuntu a complete joke, and was nearly twenty yhears ago when I tried and tossed it to go back to Slackware, but the only project they ever put out worth anything they abandoned and let it fall toa poorly supported community project making the phone OS.
I see a lot of people shit on Firefox for integrating LLM-related features. What the blog post points out and people fail to recognize is that if Mozilla stopped maintaining Firefox, almost all of its forks would die.
You're misreading why people are shitting on FF. It would have been nice if Firefox had actually worked on literally any other features in the last decade, like not trashing support for PWAs. Instead, we got nothing but stupid partnerships with companies for features not one wanted, and a succession of failures in the CEO seat of Firefox.
So, yeah, I guess I don't think it"s realistic for Firefox to have ignored the LLM craze entirely, but man, they could have managed that Google money better.
if Mozilla stopped maintaining Firefox, almost all of its forks would die.
That's an assumption. You're severely underestimating the amount of work open source maintainers put into those things.
Would these people pay [...] Canonical for their work?
Plenty of nice distribs exist without being maintained by a corporation. Good on them, for getting to have a bunch of money of the opensource, but it's not a necessary model for the opensource projects to survive.
I see a lot of people shit on Firefox for integrating LLM-related features
And that's good, as it should be. They crammed this bullshit that nobody asked for, and reluctantly gave a button to opt out a year later, and it's still on by default. This is bad behavior regardless of your stance on it.
There is zero reason to not use both. The are supposedly a FOSS organization yet they alienate FOSS users.
They alienate people who can't cope with change - but change is needed if Firefox doesn't want to disappear into irrelevance. They need to have as many communication channels open as they can, and they need to implement features that might pull in new users. They actually go out of their way to make sure new features are optional, so that legacy users can keep their experience, but even implementing the possibility of using LLMs in the browser (which is pretty much a standard thing in browsers nowadays) made these FOSS users screech like harpies - it's not like implementing a side view window (they already had those) that integraties a few API calls was a huge investment in manpower or resources. This behavior extends to the vast majority of FF forks.
I was using Librewolf, Zen Browser and Waterfox (on Android) before. Their immature screeching made me switch back to Firefox after many years. Privacy-wise i am pretty sure the loss of Librewolf's features are more than compensated by being part of a much larger group of people with my browser / extensions choice.
Their stance regarding LLM code is simply not sustainable, because in the foreseeable future discerning between human written code and LLM code will become impossible. Every tool that can identify LLM code is at the same time the tool used for adversarial training.
In the end, it is not important where the code came from. What counts is that people who submit code take responsibility for their code, regardless of how it was created - because you won't be able to filter for LLM code, but you can filter for quality.
Firefox is our last best hope for browser engine diversity
Browser engine diversity died a decade ago. As soon as Google helped extend the standards, making browser engines the overengineered mess of today,xyou can barely get past basic html and js without a multi-million-dollar company/orgnization.
We need to start anew. You can do simpler with the same capabilities, if you drop the right "features".
I just use Floorp with my linux and windows installs. on OpenBSD my options are a bit more limited so I need to either try to compile Floorp for it or find something else (if there even is anything else)
Hell Floorp is even on Haiku. It's a rock solid firefox fork made by a Japanese dev team that doesn't release/update until things are absolutely rock solid. I can't even recall the last time floorp broke, if it ever has. good browser, always my go to FF fork.
Nah, Vivaldi still has a much better anti-ai stance. Runs faster and still loads uBlock. This will likely change soon, but I'm not rushing to Firefox until I need to. Firefox is funded by Google anyway.
Vivaldi is:
- Chromium-based and thus funded by Google
- Proprietary, meaning any claims about what it's doing under the hood are unprovable
Firefox is funded by Google anyway.
That sounds like Firefox only exists because Google/Alphabet pays for it.
In reality Firefox/Mozilla have made a deal to make Google the default search engine on the default home page.
That would be a pretty stupid business decision to not have free money, what are they gonna do? Have Bing as the default search engine?
This is a bad article. Embarassingly bad at points.
The author claims Firefox is good because of only one reason: inherent moral value to be Not Google.
Firefox is our last best hope for browser engine diversity and competition.
But when Mozilla returned to Twitter - basically tweeting out an apology - the author suddenly forgot to hold Firefox to that single standard, and created an excuse for why they had to ditch the moral high ground to pursue user growth:
I’m sure the reason Firefox is on X is because they’re hoping to reach out to new users... they desperately need to reach out wherever they can.
- If Firefox's only claim to fame is to be Not Big Tech, it has to not follow in the footsteps and align itself with Big Tech.
- And if Firefox eventually makes itself ethically indistinguishable (or worse!) than the corporate alternatives, then it loses its reason to claim even moral value.
Here are some other thoughts.
The latest [complaint] was a post from a prolific blogger who has switched to Vivaldi because Firefox is now on X. He is somehow able to reconcile this with the fact that Vivaldi is also on X...
Probably because Vivaldi doesn't spend a ton of its time and money marketing itself as an alternative to big platforms. Maybe because Vivaldi realized talk is cheap and put it into action by hosting their own Mastodon server. Maybe because when Mozilla went back to Twitter, they did it with their strange apology.
the over thinkers on Hacker News come up with convoluted reasons to hate on Firefox every time the subject arises. It makes me wonder if it’s a bot campaign by Google
"Everyone I disagree with is bots" is the lowest point of this whole post.
you desperately need to help [Firefox].
The author of this post must not know that it Mozilla has rigged the game in favor of Google: you cannot "help" Firefox with a donation. That money only goes to the Foundation, which is currently spending their time lobbying against antitrust legislation. Only their corporate partners (read: Google) can give money to Firefox.
But Mozilla has been doing everything they can to make users dump Firefox!
Maybe the author should have written their article with a different truism: The straw that broke the camel's back. Mozilla keeps on disrespecting their users and chasing mirages of profit.
(Not that the phrase "throw the baby out with the bathwater" is even very good here - the author assumes Firefox is good, because Firefox is Not Google, and fails to expound on any positive qualities of the browser besides some implicit ethical value. And given Mozilla's recent behavior, it is lacking in that department.)
no comments (yet)