I'll give some examples:

  • defunding the prevention of food born illnesses leads to them becoming an issue in 2026

  • understaffing IT departments because "we don't have issues" then issues magically appear when support is taken away (surprised Pikachu face)

  • a magic witch preforms a yearly protection circle around your house, but you don't want to pay any more because the gremlin infestation is gone, but they come back after the protection circle dissipates

  • they put armed guards on merchant ships to prevent somali piracy, but then the pirates slowed down so the companies got complicit and now somali pirates are becoming an issue again

  • i (in my infinite stupidity) don't take my medicine because I feel fine, then after a few days I turn into a disaster pile of suicidal ideation and take my medicine to fix it

  • screw worms or something idk

but like the problem is in a loop where it just repeats forever because people don't realize what's preventing the issue

all 40 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 46 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Chesterton's fence

From a parable by G.K. Chesterton, suggesting that one should not remove a fence until one learns why it was erected in the first place.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Chesterton%27s_fence

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (7 children)
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Your link is broken, and that's the source anyway so I thought I'd just link directly

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    "Complacency" is a related idea but a bit more general.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    Complacency gets close, though I think it's more for things where you don't act when you should, and what OP described could almost count as sabotage - the difference between not increasing the range of an alert system (complacency) and taking it down, in both cases because "we haven't had an alert in X time"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 53 points 2 months ago
    [–] 19 points 2 months ago

    In 2013 Ruth Bader Ginsburg made a famous analogy about the US Supreme Court gutting the voting rights act. She said it's like "throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet." That comes pretty close to your sentiment, OP.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago

    In software development this is called a regression, and it is why we have regression tests. If you don't run or check the regression tests, the problems they're testing for can (and do) come back.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Like God said to Bender in Futurama "When you do things right, people won’t be sure you’ve done anything at all". I propose calling this Bender's Paradox.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago

    The best existing phrase I have is, "Dropping your guard."

    It doesn't necessarily imply anything about why you dropped your guard, and only slightly implies that the bad thing happened while your guard was down.

    We could coin a new phrase here by brainstorming. I'll start:

    Fumbled the shield

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Historical Recurrence

    The gremlins always return. That's why the magic witch offers an annual subscription plan, to protect your investment from up to two types of folklore creatures, ranging from classical antiquity to the early modern period.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    Chesterton's Fence is the first thing that comes to mind

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago
    [–] 5 points 2 months ago*

    There should be a word.

    My father-in-law was not feeling well recently so we took him to the doctor. He presented with very high blood pressure and we were all asking him what happened to the blood pressure medicine he was taking for a decade. He replied, "I stopped taking it because last time they checked my blood pressure it was fine."

    This absolutely needs a word.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    In most of your examples I think the word is kakistocracy.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago*
    • These are all types of weak regulation, I think
    • Efficiency is an aim that can lead to this
    • Systemic Fragility, or low resilience is the result
    • Chesterton's Fence (a fence should not be removed until it is understood why it was built in the first place)
    • Short-sightedness is a cause
    • Not being able to see the wood for the trees is another
  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Chesterton's fence is mentioned several times here and it's a good heuristic to avoid the issue. The issue is called the Preparedness Paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preparedness_paradox

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    The concept you are describing is stopping preventative maintenance and discovering the consequences of said. I just don't have a word for it.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the results of the USA's (first, in case this ends up needing extra specificity later) civil war are a couple other examples.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago
    [–] 2 points 2 months ago
    [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    yes - recrudesence.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    I don't know a specific word, but I always think of it as "closing the umbrella because you're not getting wet"

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Rebound?

    Like if you have migraine headache, take a preventative but when you miss it the headache comes back worse, that's a rebound headache.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    To a certain extent you are describing normalcy bias but with an added bit of object impermanence.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago
    [–] 1 point 2 months ago*

    survivorship bias preceding confirmation bias? i think this what you were looking for. for example, survivorship happens first because, antibiotics work on bacterial infection, the infection dies down and backed by science, and personal accounts, then cofirmation bias sets, you are getting better, so you stop the antibiotics prematurely because you cant be still "infected". the infection comes roaring back, now immune to antibiotics, person blames the doctor/Rx or hospital for giving them useless meds. you can apply the same to all the other 4 situations.

    i think 1 is different, theres an intentional motivation to do it, the food companies have to pay alot more to sanatize thier food, if they eliminate it, then they dont have to spend so much time doing it. 2)is also intentional, the company cuts corner, they are aware of breaches(baking it into thier profits)

    3,4,5 all fits with surviorship bias preceding confirmation bias.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago
    [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Fucking around and finding out

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    In honor of his excellency “winning” the Iran war so many times, I propose we call it “pulling a Trump.”

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago