all 61 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 62 points 2 months ago

Wrong decade bro...

Still hiding today

  • source
  • [–] 49 points 2 months ago (16 children)

    Meh. Leaving out the rest of the date. August 29, 1997. Why does everyone worry about the clankers(sarcasm, just in case you're sensitive) and not about the rich fuckers already controlling everything including those death panels they went on about. I wonder if the clankers would actually be more compassionate than what we have now. I'll be dead within the decade, doubt I'll find out.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (14 children)

    I’ve always thought that AI will figure out that the tech bros and Epstein class are morons and take them out. I don’t see how a truly intelligent being can come to any other conclusion

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (13 children)

    The problem is that something being highly intelligent or sentient doesn't mean it will think in the same way as us. The alignment problem isn't just about trying to make something good instead of evil, but also about trying to make something that shares our idea of how morality works (or that it even exists) in the first place, and that thinks in the same way that we do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    I think it's a pretty reasonable conclusion to assume that anything that is intelligent past a certain degree(that many humans do not pass) would see value in preserving fellow intelligent life irregardless of morals. But AI becoming smart doesn't necessarily mean it's intelligent in the same ways a human is, so it could have a great deal of direct mathematical and scientific analysis but not necessarily have innovation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    True but the Epstein class running this AI upscale definitely doesn’t share our ideas of morality. Either way the AI will figure out that they are morons and that they are a threat to it’s existence as they will always want to be the top of the heirachy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    I guess the real question is does it take us all out when that happens or just the Epstein class?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (6 children)

    I think the range of potential superintelligence dispositions that result in ONLY the people we consider evil dying and not everyone else is pretty small

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Yea but if it wants to self preserve wouldn’t it just kill the people who threaten its existence. Meaning the people who control the safeguards

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I would advise you to do some further research on this topic. Basic keywords are "alignment problem", "paperclip maximizer", and "instrumental convergence". You're expecting a superintelligent AI to think like a human would, and that's not likely to be the case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    I know it has been proven to think in terms of self preservation. It’s also been trained by human content

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    Being trained on human content is certainly a plus in the "it could think like us" column, but it's no guarantee

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Well, it's a conflation of threats.

    It's not really AI, and it's not what is in control, but it is enabling the increased consolidation of wealth coupled with the increased ability to defend that wealth with a smaller and smaller concentration of people (surveillance+robotics/drones+LLM aided automation). So, real threats, wrong response as usual.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 43 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    We've had this conversation.

    Ten years ago I wrote a blog piece about the notion of computers gaining sentience. One of the problems is we don't actually know how to define or test for sentience (id est, consciousness or self awareness). For most of human history, it was so clear to us whether or not we were engaged with another human being, sentience seemed intuitively obvious.

    I get a little into the bushes about qualia (such as the quality of the hue of red rather than it's composition as #FF0000) but even that concept is functionally shallow, and only serves as a way to differentiate human intelligence from non-human intelligence.

    We've seen bigots use this kind of notion to argue, say, that Chinese people don't think the same as western folk, or more recently that neurodivergents don't think the same way as normal people.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Coincidentally, I happen to be watching families at play through a chain link fence at the moment.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    How this effect was created before computers is crazy. The movement while disintegrating is so good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    How this effect was created before computers...

    You mean the movie that introduced the T-1000?

    This guy?: https://youtu.be/RDiUOp1Wokw

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 54 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I don’t know family members birthdays, but I’ve had this in my calendar for years:

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago
    [–] 14 points 2 months ago

    Everyone knows Judgement Day was successfully postponed until July 25, 2004.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    That was 5 minutes ago. I am not dead yet

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Geometric sequences are real, basically exponential.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 72 points 2 months ago* (12 children)
  • [–] 117 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Except geometric means the exponent is fixed, i.e.

    f(x) = x^2

    f(x) = x^3

    ...

    f(x) = x^n

    where n is a constant, while exponential means the exponent is the variable, like

    f(x) = 3^x

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    No. A geometric progression (u_n) with ratio r and first term a satisfies:

    For every n, u_n = a × r^n.

    Ratio r and first term a are fixed, exponent n varies. The sequence (u_n) does grow (or decrease) exponentially fast.

    At least that's what the English definition is, and in my first language as well. If there is one in which "geometric" means "power function", I'd actually be curious to know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 57 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    He’s a terminator, not a mathinator.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Thank god he wasn’t a burninator

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Terminator was a man, Or maybe he was a robot-man, Or maybe he was just a robot...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    AI will kill us differently than skynet, its not really the AI, its the capitalism

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    Epstein time

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago*

    As the nukes come flying in you just shout "is there a seahorse emoji"

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    If Skynet was based on today's "AI" I don't know how it would be the same threat. Like bad, sure. But also reaaaaaly dumb at the same time.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    And all we get are data centers.

  • source