He always speaks the truth, so he never got approved to get a credit card.
post
The right guy, presumably the liar said "the other only tell truth", then it should be a lie.
And both said she may ask one question, which can't be true and a lie at the same time.
So they are both occasional liars and whatever they say is no help at all.
Saying you may ask one question can be interpreted many ways
It could be permission, a command, or just a prediction
The truth teller could be giving a command, the rules of the interaction. The liar could be predicting you'll ask more than one question and lying about it
I think you got them on the first, but if the liar would answer more than one question, while the truth teller will only answer one, "she may ask one question" probably falls under a lie
If the guard that lied started with 4 or 5 it may have worked, I doubt she knows how to validate card numbers on the fly.
This reminds me of the time my hotel rewards membership was shared to a timeshare and the guy who called me would not take no for an answer and was practically begging me to sign up. He tried to convince me he had all my information already to gain my trust by doing the “your credit card starts with number 5” trick.
Just try to buy something on it?
You assume the dungeon has WiFi or mobile signal.
We are in 2026 I'm pretty sure there are vending machines and ATMs there now
Edit: please ignore this stupid comment I just woke up and I don't know what I'm saying
No, no. I want to hear more about the vending machines and ATMs in dungeons.
Are they the actual loot or do they teleport the stuff from a safer place?
Do the ATMs hand out cash or coins?
Can I get some instant healing for a fee when running away from monsters?
Is the fee subject to dynamic pricing?
Actually, how high is the margin? Is there a wizard that casually TPs to compete with a slightly lower prices?
Are there reverse vending machines to sell the loot without coming back to town?
Do some people just live in the dungeons, getting whatever they need from the vending machines?
Can the monsters use the vending machines?\
Probably some underpaid employee comes every week to refill the machines
Whether it's coin or cash I guess it will depend on which ATM and which bank you're using
No you can't get instant healing currently since that machine was broken and we are waiting for the IT department to send a technician
Since the adventurers guild is a bunch of communist losers the prices are legally fixed by the government after countless strikes and demonstrations
Every few levels there's an old wizard running a kiosk where you can get stuff cheaper
No reverse vending machine, the government deemed it illegal under monopoly/antitrust laws as whoever gets to control the selling machines can control the entire dungeon economy, but you can some times sell to a wizards kiosk and if you found coins or money you can deposit them at an ATM
The dungeons are still dangerous so nobody wants to live there but I would imagine some small communities or commercial centres and motels in some safe levels
And yes anyone can use a vending machine if they can pay this is capitalism after all
There is a whole show on this with 3 seasons. 🤣
Reborn as a Vending Machine, I Wander Through the Labyrinth
Not the best but least original.
I don't plan on watching Vending Machine based on the reviews I've heard, but My Ridiculous Reincarnation has a similar theme; I've seen it and it's a good comedy
Well it has credit cards so why wouldn't it?
It may have been set up in the decades where cc exist but WiFi wasn't commonplace.
I would be shocked if the carriers hadnt installed an active DAS just to ensure they meet regulatory coverage compliance, but at the very least the dungeon management would want to be implementing an effective wireless solution to ensure dungeon users are happy and staff can have access to operational information. They could also use it for tracking staff and monitoring dungeon utilisation.
Wait, they both say "To find the exit you may ask us one question". Shouldn't one of them always lie?
I think the original challenge was that you must choose one guard to pose your one question to. Not one question to both guards.
Silly girl, she forgot to ask for the expiration date! Rookie mistake. She'll never be able to use that card now, not unless she wants to brute force it.
What always bugs me about this in popular culture is that you only get to ask one guard the question, not both. So the question you would ask here would be:
“If I asked the other guard for a credit card number, expiry date and security code that wasn’t yours, what is an answer they could give me?”
Wouldn't it be easier to just ask something like "is red a color?" To one guard?
I think the original riddle also had 2 doors and the question was something like "which door would your partner say leads to freedom" iirc, which makes both point to the one that leads to death.
can you unpack the logic in that last part for me?
“If I asked the other guard for a credit card number, expiry date and security code that wasn’t yours, what is an answer they could give me?”
Truth guard: the other guard lies => if asked for details that weren’t the truth guard, must lie => tells details that are truth guard’s => truth guard tells you these correct details
Lie guard: other guard tells truth => could state any details that are not lie guard’s => lie guard must therefore tell you their credit card info
So you get one of the guard’s info. You could change it to a specific guard’s info if you’d like.
I guess I'm not getting it. Couldn't the "that wasn't yours" part be misconstrued to allow for anyone's info?
The truth guard could recite someone else's credit card (which would still be a win), but the lie guard could fabricate false numbers completely
You could rephrase it to
“If I asked the other guard for an example of a credit card number, expiry date and security code that weren’t the details of the guard I am currently talking to, what is an answer they could give me?”
if you’re worried about misinterpretation.
If you were to ask the lying guard for ‘an example of a credit card number, expiry date and security code that weren’t the details of the other guard’, they would necessarily have to give the correct details, which the truth guard would pass on
If you were to ask the truthful guard for ‘an example of a credit card number, expiry date and security code that weren’t the details of the other guard’, they would necessarily not be the correct details. However, the truthful guard could answer with any incorrect details, and so the complement of the set of details the truth guard could give is only the correct details, which the lying guard would therefore have to give. That’s why you ask for ‘an example’.
If you were to ask the lying guard for ‘an example of a credit card number, expiry date and security code that weren’t the details of the other guard’, they would necessarily have to give the correct details, which the truth guard would pass on
Couldn't they just lie and give you a non-working example?
Or are you hinging your question on a variation of "don't tell me the other guard's credit card information", which you expect the lying card to contradict and tell you?
You’re asking for an example of details that aren’t those of the other guard. If they give you a non-working example, then the lying guard has been truthful. Which is a contradiction.
Consider the question ‘what is an example of something that is not a cat?’. Any answer that is not a cat is truthful; therefore the lying guard must give an example of a cat.
These are mythical beings no? Surely you would need to be specific, it's kind of their thing.
That's right, we've all seen Labyrinth
You’d be surprised, given the replies I’ve had
if one lies then the whole setup does not work because of how they both stated the rules.
you know I just realized it would work if the one that says the one always lies does not always lie but then your effed.
Those are two questions.
Nope. One question, multiple data points requested.
She's asking for two different series of numbers.
an easy cope out: "I don't know" unless he's actually memorised the number its a truth, I know I don't remember more than the last 4 on any of my cards.
The one doing the explaining has to be truthful anyway, otherwise its just a Samurai Jack situation and they're both liars.
In the first panel theyre both being truthful. Just sayingm
all 29 comments