top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 120 points 2 months ago (33 children)

Most junk food in the US has gone off the rails in terms of price. Like seriously, don't spend money on food that has zero nutritional value and is actively harmful to your health. You'll feel so much better and your bank account will be so much bigger.

I guess I have corporate America to thank for no longer buying chips, candy, or baked goods that I might've otherwise splurged on as a treat. Can't justify it with prices the way they are.

  • source
  • hideshow 33 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago (15 children)

    I was with you, up until baked goods. What's wrong with baked goods? A nice loaf of bread freshly baked from a bakery? Or maybe a baked potato with cheese and bacon? Or maybe a big bag of pot.........wait, sorry. Wrong kind of baked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago* (11 children)

    😋
    I think baked goods as a treat would be cakes or cookies.
    Also from what I hear in USA bread is generally of very poor quality, but probably better from a baker.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    Mass produced, store bought bread is trash, but you can also find some of the nest quality bread you'll ever taste if you go to specialty bakers insteadof supermarkets. I live in Wyoming and I can buy breads made with heirloom grains that are actually highly nutritious. The same applies to cookies, etc. Remember, the USA is a major producer of grains. We grow grain of exceptional quality. We just don't sell it to our own people at a discount. We export the good stuff for profit and eat the low quality high yield stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I was in California in the 80's, and the store bought bread tasted very well back then IMO.
    I bought some at a local shop, and used as part of my breakfast I made myself in my hotel room to save money. 😋

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Depending on the brand it might have been better 40 years ago. Or if it was wonder bread, you just liked the sugar in it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    No I hate added sugar in bread. So there was definitely no added sugar, or at the most very little.
    It was one of those kinds that are supposed to be more healthy because they use whole grains.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Good bread is available here but people are cheap and lazy so they don’t go looking for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Funny, some of the best bread here is also some of the cheapest.
    As a Dane I eat a lot of rye-bread, and Schwarzbrot is the best IMO.
    It is also cheap, because it is very simple to make. And being simple to make, makes it high quality because there aren't a lot of additives.
    But AFAIK the cheap bread in USA is simply illegal in EU, because it uses additives that aren't allowed here.

    Anyways, yes of course you can get quality, but bread should not be expensive just because it is of proper quality, the ingredients used to make good bread are dirt cheap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Wonder Bread, which is the OG American fortified "white bread," is definitely available in Europe. I don't think any of the ingredients are illegal in Europe, it's just that it's wholly devoid of the nutritional value imparted by proper fermentation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    OG?
    No Wonder bread is not available in Europe. At least I can't find anywhere where it is.
    And my guess is that if some specialty stores import it, it is not sold as bread but as an American specialty.
    But I don't see why anyone would import it, it's just a generic white bread with no particular quality.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Baked goods are also carbohydrate delivery vehicles. As far as your body is concerned they all raise blood glucose the same (candy, bread).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Legit. I sound like an old man but I remember when junk food cost at least 3 bucks or something. In my area its 6.79. 6 fucking 79? Fuck offffff. This shits predatory and crazy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I might've eaten a disgusting amount of Costco sized Doritos during the early pandemic. A giant bag for $3.50. Now those bags are closer to $8 and I can't remember the last time I bought chips.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Frito Lay fucked up by charging $7 for a bag of chips. It took a chunk out of their profits when people stopped buying them. They have reversed course for now.

    https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2026-04-07/how-7-bags-of-doritos-cost-pepsico-billions-in-sales

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago*

    During the pandemic... PepsiCo raised prices ... By the third quarter of 2022, net pricing was up 20% from a year earlier.

    senior managers made clear they didn’t want to go backward on prices,

    the company’s stock down more than 20% from a peak in 2023

    company tried anything else that might lure customers: promotions, shrinkflation. None of it worked.

    PepsiCo ... planned to lower prices ... Up to 15% off some snacks, Laguarta described the cuts as “very surgical.” It also underwent a series of cost cutting measures, including layoffs.

    PepsiCo CEO Ramon Laguarta receives an annual base salary of approximately $1.69 million, with a total annual compensation package—including stock awards, options, and performance bonuses—totaling roughly $23.9 million to $28.8 million

    Pictured: A Fucking Moron.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Like seriously, don't spend money on food that has zero nutritional value and is actively harmful to your health.

    Oh fuck off with this holier than thou horseshit. It's a chocolate bar. People aren't living off these things as their only meals every day of the week. It's a treat coming home from work, or for a job well done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    If you need a $7 candy bar "as a treat" for a job well done I'm not sure you're an adult.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    My local grocery outlet still has gummy works in the plastic thing for like $2, and Marshall's still has treats for a decent price. If you're expecting cheap stuff from your local grocer, that's on you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 65 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Wow they really do make it hard to find the "And I raped kids" version

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    The one thing I miss windows for :^(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago (14 children)

    At least it's snap eligible

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    Ya...and you can only get snap if you work 80 hrs a week, have written consent from your boss, your past 4 bosses, the blood of a tainted saint, the pubes of a dead god, the hymen of a virgin, And 3 hearts from a slain dragon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    Lol tell that to my meth head mother that gets SNAP without having held a job in her life. She sells her snap for more meth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    Either she's lying to them or you are lying. Bring me your mother 's last used needle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Of course she’s lying to them lmao. She’s a tweaker. Has been for 20 years. She also gets disability because her stupid ass hurt herself 15 years ago during one of her mandated community service assignments when she got arrested for possession, and that disability waives her work requirement. Even though her only actual disability is that she’s dumb as fuck.

    But I’ll also give you context. I grew up in Oklahoma. Half the state is on meth. The overlap of people on SNAP in Oklahoma and people on meth is almost just a single circle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Well man, that's tough titty. While I don't support your mother's life style, I won't through rocks in glass houses. I've been down bad for drugs and I'm honest to folks when I say don't do anything harder than you.

    I like my weed and once in a blue moon some molly.

    But if I was to give ant statement to what you have said...it be plain ol I don't care. I don't care if she sucks big horse dick for her meth. I don't care if she tripped on her own pee in wallie world and sued them to kingdom come and used it all to buy meth. I do not care. Give her snaps. In fact I believe most folks should get snap. Hell in my eyes make it a global thing.

    No one deserves to go hungry. No one deserves to go without food or to feel that pain of not knowing when they will eat.

    I do not care if she finger pops her pussy on down to a Ford F Fuck fifty event and squirt slides her way out of orbit. She should be able to eat. And that goes for everyone. Food should not be a problem of "well who get some food and who doesn't. " it should be about if the food we eat is safe. That's it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Um. Ok?

    Not sure what any of that has to do with this conversation. The whole thing was about

    Ya…and you can only get snap if you work 80 hrs a week, have written consent from your boss, your past 4 bosses, the blood of a tainted saint, the pubes of a dead god, the hymen of a virgin, And 3 hearts from a slain dragon.

    Which is just flat out not even true. And that was my only point. It's not 9 thousand impossible hoops to jump through.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Well for me they wanted me to jump through hoops. Mainly cause I run my own business cleaning airbs and houses.

    My point was that itndoesnt matter what someone is or does, food should be available for everyone. No one should go without food.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    And I never said otherwise. You just made it up to argue against for some reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Sorry didn't see your reply until now.

    I really don't know what you mean. I think we may have a miscommunication here.

    I'm just saying it shouldn't even be a thing. I'm more in the boat of everyone deserves food. Give it to everyone. We have plenty of it.

    My bad if we crossed wires dude.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    Am I uneducated about how SNAP works, or is this a rare Texas W?

    I think it's outrageous that you can't even buy hygiene articles or medicines with SNAP, and in that way it'd make sense that something so non-nutritious like candy shouldn't be allowed? Alcohol isn't allowed either for example, despite the fact that beer would be (at least marginally) more nutritious than candy.

    So other than increasing the stigma already associated with SNAP, is it really problematic to ban candy? Even if it's not a major cost point, the principle of "poor people are too dumb to budget themselves, so we won't let them buy necessities like diapers and tampons... but we'll gladly let them buy candy" just feels wrong to me?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago

    But if you break it in half, you'll have 2 bars, and that's like 50% off! Break it again, 50+50 that's 100% off! Why stop there?! Trump did say he was gonna cut prices by 700%.

    Promises made, Americans wept 🙃

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago

    Canadian here, I remember years ago going to the US, we were at par for money, and a candy bar in the US was like $1 or $2. So the $2 chocolate bar was $2 for us too.

    Now this US$6.49 is basically CA$10, it is insane!

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    What type of store is this in?

    Gas stations, or department stores around me gouge the shit out of you for snacks/candy. Easily $5-6cad for a chocolate bar. A dollar store though, usually sells an Oh Henry (~58g) for $1.25 or $2 for a 'share size' (the 2 smaller bars in one package ~82g).

    Still not great, but much better than $6.50 (USD I assume)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (5 children)

    a king sized snickers costs 3 bucks.

    this candy bar is a deal compared to that, lol.

    edit: I'm wrong, that says 2 Bars on the edge, not 2 pounds (why is lbs short for pounds anyway?!)

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Lbs is a shortened version of the Greek word for measuring scales. So it actually doesn‘t mean a specific weight, but more like “weighed” or something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    While true that originally it also meant "balance" (in late latin we later got the word bilanx for scales - literally two plates), lb is for latin libra, and it was an actual specific weight (with a corresponding economical value in the Roman as coin) in use since the Roman republic, and it has remained in use for more than two millennia all over the world (with slighly different values depending on time and place, but usually between 350-450grams). It's not an accident the the UK pound stirling coin still has the same L shaped symbol £, same as the italian lira, etc

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Pound in other languages is "libra", as is weight scale ...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (11 children)

    How big are they? There is zero indication that I can see.

    I just looked up the prices for a chocolate bar here in Denmark, The price for a 40-50g chocolate bar is around $2 USD in supermarkets.
    We don't have the ones OP posted, but the price for a 50g Mars bar is $2.20 USD. And that price includes 25% VAT.
    Without VAT it's $1.84 USD.

    So the price in the image seems insane.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    They're about the largest ones you can buy lol. It's a super king sized that is two full sized bars in the package. Roughly 150g total, and 720kcal for the whole thing.

    This particular store is also inflated. The same thing is $3.29 at the store by me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (8 children)

    Yes I thought something must be off.
    I guess OP was infuriated about the wildly inflated price at this shop.
    Not about prices in general.

    But that is one oversized bar. 😋

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Prices in general are nuts, but cherry picking outliers like this doesn't help.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    No and he doesn't even write the name of the supermarket.
    Which is the real infuriating thing here IMO.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    I'm willing to bet not even a super market. Probably some overpriced gas station/quick stop kind of place. Those are the ones that tend to inflate the prices like this, catching people getting gas that want a quick snack.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    quick stop kind of place.

    Yes of course, that must be it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    I'm pretty certain you can buy these at Normal for about 20 kroner.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (1 child)

    What? Never been there, but I can see I have one pretty close by.
    Is that a 150g pack. 20,- kr is only about $3 USD, that is cheaper than in USA where it's apparently about $3.50.

    Probably not going there anytime soon, it seems to be heavily dominated by American brands. And we are not buying American in our household.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    I am so glad I am not the only one who thought that this was a 2 pound bar..

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    This follows my conspiracy theory that grocery stores in areas with high SNAP benefits ussge increase the prices on everything significantly. I have some family in an area where a lot of people rely on SNAP, and spent $20 on a pack of five hot dogs.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Don't buy it?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    They better get used to people not buying their candy bars.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    It's junk food, not fancy nice food. It's bad for you, full stop. Nobody is going to pay that price for junk food. This also goes for fast food that now thinks it's some luxury food, it's not, it's still junk. For God sakes, stop giving these soulless,oney sucking corporations your money. It's that simple. This bs stops when the money stops.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Seriously, for that price you could eat real foodlike substances, perhaps even something that was in the ground more recently than it was in a factory.

    Gotta disagree with the "no one will pay for it" part of your comment though. People can't get enough of anything that's bad for them! Most of them will sit there in their micro plastic shedding clothes, not getting exercise, under a UV light, smoking a cigarette while drinking alcohol and downing Tylenol and Advil by the bottle, while blasting their eyeballs with blue light and huffing VOCs before they ever touch a raddish.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    One bar is 5.25 oz so... 43.6 USD/kg In Norway a 51g bar cost me 684.31NOK/kg. At today's Google fex rate is 73.33 USD.

    But then it's an import from the US and who knows what gets tariffed and taxed like fuck these days

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago*

    Funny how they say it's 120 calories per 1/8th of the pack 🙄 Yeah guys, that's how people eat candy bars.

    1/8th at a time.

    The online nutrition information for a king size is similar, in that it says 150 calories for 1/3 of the bar. So the individual one is about 450 calories, while 2 of them is 960, 60 calories more than it should be.

    Or I'm reading the fine print on the packaging wrong, in which case it says 120 calories per 1/6th of the pack, which would bring it out to 720 calories, or, two bars smaller than the "king size," which seems deceptive, considering the packaging says it's a "super king 2 bars."

    Just deceptive marketing and shrinkflation, all wrapped up in one shitty package!

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Pure lunacy, I'd never.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Any amount of money for most US 'chocolate' is too much.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    Reeses lovers are a cult. They know the chocolate is bad, they just want the peanut butter which is over roasted and hopped up on sugar.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Im willing to bet most people do not look at the price tag before buying it. Same with soda, chips, etc. Maybe they don't even look at the register. They just swipe their card, same as always.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Huh. And hereabouts I can generally get a good 250g block of chocolate for the equivalent before tax of US$3.40.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›