top 77 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 72 points 2 months ago (7 children)

This person vs me have very different versions of 'snapping', and mine involves much stronger vulgarities than 'haha'...

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 2 months ago (5 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 70 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    I hated this shit when I was on the job hunt. Turned a 5 minute application into a 30 minute one.

    Then multiply that by a bunch per day.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    I got frustrated and eventually just skipped any that did this. If my resume isn't sufficient, why do you accept it at all? Just don't take the resume, or don't take the form. Pick. Not both.

    Not worth it. The places that did this never called me anyway. Never.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    The problem is that resumes are extremely hard for a computer to parse. If you're dealing with potentially thousands of applicants, you need to be able to weed out people who don't meet the minimum requirements or else you'd be spending weeks reading resumes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    I’m aware of that and don't care, that’s the problem of whomever is poorly and impersonally doing hiring.

    If they don't want thousands of applicants, there are tons of recruitment strategies that avoid that problem, like job fairs, employee referral bonuses, direct recruitment, and working with agencies for placements, to name only four off the top of my head.

    If they want to send their ad to the wolves, they won’t get good results, but they will get a lot of them. They are also probably an exceptionally shit place to work because they can’t even recruit talent because they are “suffering from abundance” without resorting to screening out people who can’t do data entry or have better things to do than jumping through hoops.

    Yeah cool. Good for them. Easily fixed problem, but everyone wants unicorn workers, so they don't need any training, and that requires casting a very wide net and screening out the catch they don't want.

    Fuck ‘em.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 47 points 2 months ago* (13 children)

    How about we... standardize application forms?

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (8 children)
  • [+] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    As someone who built a system for reading and parsing resumes: no we didn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    We let it die and made commercial systems to sell to companies instead claiming to streamline HR.

    We constantly leave good systems behind because some chucklefuck wants to monetize something

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Résumés are the complete opposite of a standardized format.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    The funny things is that the non seeking websites don't want to implement this, because it could help their competitors, so we have what we have.

    I think the most likely way such standardization would happen if somebody would develop an open source format available free to use without any royalties and people would adopt it. Something like a QR code that would contain the details on some markup language. I think XML is better, but seems like JSON is more popular now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    And also for flats. The portals themselves do have a standard to get that info (OpenImmo, HR Open Standards), but since the portals prefer lock-in, the userside is stuck with custom applications.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    That's basically what the screenshot shows ? The uploaded resume is just for the interview.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    and they ask you to bring in a physical copy of it, i was thinking why they dint have it on thier computers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago* (6 children)

    Considering what I've entered into job applications and still gotten the job, I am pretty fucking sure nobody actually reads your resume or application until 15 minutes before your interview if ever. I'll put some crazy BS in mine just to see if they read it and have never been asked about any of the crazy shit I have on there. Like being a manager of a non-existent company when I was only 3 years old. Or using myself as my references.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    As someone that was hiring that is correct and I didn’t read the other 200 resumes sent in either. Picked 5, interviewed and hired 1 out of the 5 resumes I read

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    So, a lottery? Yay, that's dismal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago*

    No, its not. I also hire and we take the time to look through the CVs of relevant candidates. If I call someone in I will have questions about their CV for the interview.

    Where the lottery actually exists is whether you are the same type of person as the interviewer, because that has more of an influence on whether you get hired.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago

    speedy job apply browser plugin

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    I actually just filled out an application on indeed because I figured why not. The questions are getting strange. It's not a government job, no clearance required, so why are you asking if I'm a citizen of Syria?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Guessing it was for a work from home gig? Companies have been getting in hot water recently for unwittingly hiring people from countries like North Korea and inadvertently breaking US sanctions by paying them.

    This is probably just a way for companies to claim in good faith that they were attempting to do some sort of screening to prevent it .

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    I haven't worked for a company that hasn't done a background check. How on earth would place of birth not show up? Hell even the movie theater I applied to in 2006 did a background check.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I would have to guess that they use stolen identities. Also a lot of the companies that claim they are running background checks for employees often do not. Usually the threat of doing so will weed out people, and they don't tend to be cheap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • These days I have to check online on the status of them and what not. Years ago I'm sure a lot of companies may have just lied like your saying because how would you know. That said in 2020 I changed my address on something to Sofi stadium because I was being dumb and had paid something off I thought but they contacted me years later in 2020 saying I owed them $280 or something. Turns out I sent them the amount I had owed the month prior, so the interest that accrued over the month left a balance of like $25 or something and they just let it sit and add late fees until that collection company called me. Being stubborn I asked them if I could pay the $25 and call it even, they said no so I hung up and changed the address on the account because California has more protections about harassing people.

    Sure enough all my background checks now have a section where the county that Inglewood is in has to state I don't have a criminal record there. I've never even been to LA, let alone lived there.. oops.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Yes I use the ol “see resume” a lot.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    The alternative is they make a program to read your resume and when it reads it wrong you get filtered out for that

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Not defending the recruiters for not reading resumes, but I've seen the recruiting queue and it sucks.

    Way more than half the applications are fake, from out of the country (for jobs that require you to work physically at the location), or just clearly entered for unemployment requirements. Across dozens of applications on each of the dozens of open positions each week.

    State/federal requirements mean the jobs have to be posted to a bunch of equal opportunity job boards that never produce real candidates.

    There's a reason recruiters are feeding all their shit through AI. It became an AI slop fight for both sides of the job application process.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago*

    yea ive been hearing some , alot h applicants are using AI to send, apply with 100s or 1000+ resumes at once in a given year or a few months. i imagine more than one of these are applied to jobs they dont really fit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    I don't work in recruiting at all. I don't read resumes.

    Office vs labor in my industry is weighted towards labor making more money.

    Non-union on government contracts requires prevailing wage pay at union agreed rates. A laborer (basic unskilled labor) can make $45/hour with fringe benefits at $25/hour. They make OT on top of that which the salaried office employees don't.

    Not every industry pays their workers garbage.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    The form is sent to HR, the resume is read by a hiring manager

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    This is a post about finishing college and not lying on your resume. With all the ID and AI verification process, big corporations are going to make a push to reconnect education with employment.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    its very time consuming and expensive which is why they skip all that and ask you to show your resume multiple times. theres a reason you have to pay for your official transcripts/unofficial transcripts from hs/or college, also for some jobs they require references, or LORs.

    It make sense for fields, like lawyer, MD or a professorship at a university, or some ivy league level requirement, theres an extra necessity for those jobs to verify your education.. colleges arnt just going to willing hand over the info, hence why they ask you for your unofficial transcripts(official is usually for advanced college programs), and any job that requires licensures or certs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -51 points 2 months ago (22 children)

    Real talk - if the applicant can't be assed to fill out a form or write a cover letter then maybe they aren't a good fit. Paperwork that people hate to do is critically important for many jobs.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Okay but do you want to do that hundreds or thousands of times?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (4 children)

    Like, 8 hours a day, at a desk, for money, over the course of an entire career...? Yeah, that's why I'm filling out this application.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    If you're filling out the exact same data into forms for 8 hours a day for 50 years, maybe automate it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    now we're at the victim blaming stage where we expect people to utilize 100k a year job skills just to fill out applications for burger king.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Who in Burger King spends all their days filling out the exact same data all the time? Most people I see at Burger King are making food.

    I was replying to the person saying that it's important that people show they can fill out forms with precision and I'm saying that filling out the same exact data into a bunch of forms isn't what anyone does at their job because if it was, that position should be automated away anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Insane mental gymnastics on display here. "Let us waste your time doing nothing of value or meaning to prove how you'll behave when given a task of value and meaning" is linkedinlunatics material.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Let us waste your time doing nothing of value or meaning to prove how you’ll behave when given a task of value and meaning” is linkedinlunatics material.

    You've never had a job have you ?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    I've had many. None of them did this to me. If they wanted to see what I could do they would put me in a real but low stakes situation with supervision and see how I performed. You've become accustomed to the inexcusable to the point where you're making excuses on its behalf. I pity you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    The form are important because 90% of the applicants for a job these days aren't remotely qualified because people shotgun resumes at a hundred jobs at once without even reading the qualifications and all their resumes are formatted differently.

    I don't have the time to go through that, so yeah - I filter out people who don't bother to fill in the fields because they probably didn't even read what the job is.

    The fields get the resume to my desk. The resume and cover letter get you an interview, and the interview gets the job offer.

    I hear about all these people sending out hundreds of job applications in every direction with no response, and it makes sense. When you're competing against a hundred people for a job, you won't stand out with a half-ass application. Focus on doing fewer, higher-quality applications.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    Why should I waste time putting effort into an application when you dont even read, let alone respond to over half of them anyway

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    When I have dozens or hundreds of applications to sift through, why should I look at yours if you can't be bothered to complete it when others have?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Because thats your job that you are getting paid to do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    No. I'm being paid to keep the city running, and finding someone qualified to fill open positions in my department is one part of that. Accurate record-keeping is an important part of our work and a legal requirement. Someone who doesn't understand or care that using a standard format for the recording and analysis of information is important isn't worth considering any further. Hiring someone so arrogant or lazy is worse than leaving the position open, because they cause more issues down the line than they resolve.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)