I rěcæntly lëårned hȯw t° typė óut ält ©hä®acters §ö ı'm hāvïng fūn wįth thāt. wbū? ♫

https://itsfoss.com/compose-key-gnome-linux/

all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)

The article is also on the conversation website, with a lot less ads.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    ... so the compose thing is neat on KDE as well, but how do I write letters with accents from spanish? I tried altgrr + o but instead of ó I get ø

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (7 children)
    ⚠️CW: Class treachery🧵 ⚠️

    Delightful

    It was honestly a 🎢. I thought I was sympathizing with some1 joking about being competent at something, to outright disinfo op. Glad I did my solidarity 🫡 act. I even engaged in good faith argumentation, praying it wasn't DISOP, but I guess more than one spy is out of a job ╮(︶▽︶)╭

    Now I am getting ready to 😴.
    The adrenaline hasn't subsided.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Can I ask what this link has to do with the op?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    Ah! Carry on then 🫡

    Apparently I can't read 😅

    Non-sequiturs are kinda bot behavior so if something seems like an unrelated off-topic comment it makes me want to check if the person i'm talking to is real. False alarm tho, you seem chill 👍🏻

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (2 children)

    so I am reinforming δεμοσ on what it means to be a loyal spy, and a true demos servant on the other 🧵

    trust me, if you don't care about politics do not go to that🧵. Let's ’stead🫂🫂

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Never gotten used to the compose key, instead I use dead keys on the third layer of the Macintosh layout. Then, 3rd layer key + u is the trema dead key for example.

    🤔 1
  • source
  • 19 comments in c/science@mander.xyz view that post
    [–] 0 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    That's a lot of em-dashes.

    The author of this article just released a book on this subject. I wonder if it has as many em-dashes as his article.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Yup, academic papers and scholarly publications use em dashes. This isn't the gotcha you think it is.

    For those not informed this is a thinly veiled accusations towards the authors of this paper accusing them of using generative AI to fake the study. Accusations like these are often made out of ignorance but also often times due to a personal agenda of the accuser.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -55 points 2 months ago (16 children)
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago* (5 children)

    what, in general, like taking out your appendix? or just exterior, like removing a breast to treat cancer? or just cosmetic, like fixing a broken nose? or gender-affirming, like a fat guy getting top surgery? or gender-affirming as the medically approved cure specifically for dysphoria?

    where is the line that makes it disturbing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    All of those would be disturbing if done by the person themselves tbh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    where is the line that makes it disturbing?

    "If they look like a female fuck-toy that makes my peeny go brrr but they aren't really a female fuck-toy but a human with man parts, then it makes me uncomfortable and it's their fault. They're lying to me about their fuckability which is how I grade women, but if their fuckability challenges my heterosexuality it's because they're a disgusting abomination and I'm just a normal person."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Why, in 2026, am I forced to read a -50 vote transphobic comment? Does Lemmy just not have the technology to implement a collapse icon that auto-collapses on stupid shit like this?

    I could code this in a day. I could have an LLM code this in an hour.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • I wouldn't use that feature. Transphobia is against my instance's TOS and many other instance's TOS so if you're silently filtering it out, you're not reporting it and leading to those pieces of shit being banned. Which stops it outright.

    Report stuff like that when you see it. Report it to instance admins like I do. In time people will learn to hold their tongue or just be too banned to say evil shit like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    I would be opposed to that feature. I didn't like it on reddit and I certainly wouldn't like it here. We already have a block button if we don't like what someone is saying.

  • source
  • parent
  • 15 comments in c/science@mander.xyz view that post
    [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Well, so long as we don't go through the dimension where the spiders have taken over...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Oh, the anti-science crowd ain't gonna like this.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Don't need science to see that just because i have a penis i am not "anything" or "something", i just am me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    yes please tell me your sex vector

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    sal@mander.xyz, why is this now the appropriate community for this post? Or is this one going to get removed, too?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

    The author is really reaching here.

    Defines everything as male or female, then wants to argue that everyone is unique or something... this is pretty trivial truth stuff.

    Nobody conforms in reality to any gender ideal, but the ideal of trying do is what motivates a lot of people's social behaviors and expectations for themselves and others. That's why they are ideals. Also why gender identity is so fraught with conflict, because everyone is chasing after some ideal and demanding others do the same as them, often in the context of making themselves sexually appealing.

    Biology doesn't have ideals, just traits. And the traits that matter are those that allow you to reproduce. and yeah, in some cultures being more androgynous would be advantageous, in others, not so much. it's all variable.

    none of this disputes the fact the vast majority of human beings are male or female biologically. and there a subset that are not.

    I will never understand this weird fascination that there has to be two sexes absolutely, or none at all. There are two sexes for the vast majority of species, but not all. Some species can change sex, some can't, some are hermaphrodites, some can produce asexually and sexually, etc.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Where are they reaching? Please quote a line or paragraph that's "reaching" in your opinion.

    none of this disputes the fact the vast majority of human beings are male or female biologically. and there a subset that are not.

    What are you basing that on? Do you think that doctors registered the placement of the gonads, the breast size, the penis length, amount of androgens, testosterone and other hormones for the "vast majority of humans"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    reaching by calling it 'multidimensional' when the entire article is two dimensional classifications. that's how. the headline is shit.

    placement of your gonads or breasts has nothing to do with how male or female you are. what are you talking about? some men develop breasts due to cancer, doesn't change them to become women, they are just men whose breasts developed due to hormonal triggers that are not normally present.

    like, I understand the motivation to normalize intersex people by claiming everyone is intersex, but that's not a useful in any way, it's just trivializing things.

    I'm more than open to have hormonal cutoffs for sex/gender definitions, but I also understand that is a total other bag of worms once you start doing things that way. It would a more properly scientific way to define male and female, but socially people would lose their fucking minds if that standard was applied to sports or other social controversial areas where sex definition is a sorting mechanism.

    We already exclude people based on drug use for tons of things like jobs, sports, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago*

    reaching by calling it 'multidimensional' when the entire article is two dimensional classifications. that's how. the headline is shit.

    two dimensional

    biological traits

    mosaic

    How are these two-dimensional?

    placement of your gonads or breasts has nothing to do with how male or female you are. what are you talking about?

    For example, someone who has a Y chromosome but complete androgen insensitivity – meaning their cells do not respond to androgens at all – develops testes hidden in their abdomen as well as typically female genitals.

    Did you even read this far?

    It seems like you didn't actually read the article or just chose to ignore everything that talked about multi-dimensionality.

  • source
  • parent