The new order sweeps away decades of existing U.S. cybersecurity policy prohibiting private companies from conducting 'hack back' attacks or offensive cyber operations.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20260813215558/https://techcrunch.com/2026/08/13/in-a-first-us-will-allow-some-private-firms-to-carry-out-cyberattacks/

all 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 50 points 2 months ago (1 child)

Shadowrunners, start your engines

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    As usual we’re getting the shitty cyberpunk future. The franchise nation-states, the corporate metanationals, the incessant spying, corporate control, collapsed environment etc… with none of the cool personal tech or flying cars.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    What? Your 5inch oracle isn’t cool enough?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    God, I wish mine was that long. And it's no oracle, it makes awful decisions as often as I do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Only in the U.S. would cyber warfare be privatized...

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    I thought most of the attacks we get from China are state sponsored

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    It's about private companies who are allowed to hack, not the government themselves. And China has those too, like Israel and the US.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Problem is, the device the firms might be attacking is possibly just a zombie. A victim themselves.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Laws today exist seemingly to decide who can win and who can't. I'd like to think they can exist to wisely guide our behaviors to encourage a better future, maybe I'm naive.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago*

    Laws have always been the way the upper class controls the lower classes. When we had more bargaining power they spent more effort to keep us happy, but as we gradually lose bargaining power we are seeing them take more and more.

    To elaborate: laws always existed to decide who wins and who doesn't. It just used to be more subtle mechanisms, like capital giving access to lawyers and skilled labor. Other times it was super obvious, such as with slavery.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Reminds me of the thread two days ago about the regime issuing letters of marque.

    I also found this relevant thread from a year ago while searching for the other one.

    Trump's cronies really want to go all-in on the mercantilism, don't they?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    Didn't they used to do this with pirates and merchant ships?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    This will be be a fascinating period for future historians to study, providing there’s time for people to do that between hunting for mutant gilas and hiding from ruinstorms.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago*

    Future historians won’t be able to figure out squat, not since websites turn over fast and data gets lost in remodels.

    The only thing that may be reliable is the trash, the physical trash. And all they can say about that is we were remodeling like we had the money.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    As a treat.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    And so a new golden age of pirates began....

  • source