Officers for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) will be equipped with much-delayed body cameras by the end of next month, it was reported on Friday. But experts have questioned the transparency of a policy that allows the ICE director to restrict the public release of footage unless “it is in the best interests of the agency”.

top 35 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 130 points 3 months ago (6 children)

So, by the transitive property, if the footage is not released then it assumed to be not in the agency's best interests?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Also every camera malfunction they try to claim, or footage gone missing, it's all just an admission of wrong doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago

    and what little might get released is carefully crafted to support their own (and most likely, totally bullshit) narrative. the rest of the clip, the rest of the videos from all the other cameras.. they don't exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • So now, as a potential grand juror, I can now be certain that anything a prosecutor says is absolutely not true unless they produce the video evidence unequivocally proving it so.

    Thank you for helping me make a better decision.

    (I know ICE doesn't have jurors, but I assume this will be officially adopted by other departments.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Logically, I don't think so. They said basically that if something's released, it's in their best interests. So, Released(x) --> BestInterestsOfICE(x).

    You can't derive !Released(x) --> !BestInterestsOfICE(x) from that statement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Yes you can actually. You'd be correct if they were supposed to release everything, like a daily upload to public channels of every single bodycam in the organization, but that is not and never has been a thing.

    You can derive that under the conditions that exist every time releasing footage becomes a consideration. Yes that is not how general logic works but general logic is not universally applicable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 3 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    They'll edit it down to make protesters look bad and them look good and release that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    See how that protestor assaulted the ICE vehicle with their body?!?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    "Oh that Rodney King murder tape, it all depends on how you look at it...."

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdHvwBwTnAc

    An aside: JFC, Bill Hicks seems more relevant than ever these days. I know, I know, he was a "boomer" though, so we should probably all ignore his body of work...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Every agency of the government should have only one interest, the well being of the people.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    And just why is this left up to them?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Of course they won't. The number one principle about ICE is that it can not and will not be held accountable to anyone but itself and the President.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago

    Our taxes paid for that footage. It belongs to all of us. Period.

    We need representatives with some backbone

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago

    So like any other piece of shit police force

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago

    the transparency of a policy that allows the ICE director to restrict the public release of footage unless “it is in the best interests of the agency”.

    Lets see how made up department policy stands up to a FOIA request in front of a federal judge.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago*

    So it's along the same lines as regular cops except instead of the hardware/footage mYsTeRiOuSlY "malfunctioned", "corrupt footage" or "deleted" every time they are under investigation for excessive brutality or gross negligence the getapo ice can just say "fuck you, no"

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago

    The audacity with taxpayer salaries. Fuck ICE.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago

    So if they don’t release it we can assume they were in the wrong. Now we need the media to start reporting like that’s the case. “ICE refused to release the video because it will make them look bad or show guilt, per their own statements”. Then the courts need to start ruling that way as admission of guilt when video and other evidence is withheld or destroyed.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    If not gestapo then why do gestapo things?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    All they've done is state plainly what has always been every law enforcement agency's unofficial policy regarding body-cam footage and made it official. ICE is what the police want to be but can't be seen openly as, a fascist paramilitary occupying force. The only reason police keep up the appearance of transparency and accountability is because mass movements and the threat of them has forced them to. ICE is as yet unburdened by that baggage, though they got a taste of it after the surge in Minneapolis and they briefly had to pretend to change by firing Kristi Noem.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    This was known btw when they started pushing for body cams.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Somebody needs to be following Susan Collins and screaming this, with a sign, 24/7

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    I feel like there was legislation passed federally after BLM that stated departments had to release body cam footage publicly if requested? I know atleast for police officers.

    Does that not apply for ICE?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Don't they then have to classify all footage and declassify what they want to use publically at the least?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago*

    well then they'll keep losing over and over in court and end up paying massive penalties. If their goal is to make dissidents rich winning easy court cases, and set precedents they dont like, I guess have at it. I look forward to my turn beating their dumb arses in court. Maybe getting rich off ICE misconduct can be the new American Dream.

    These dummies keep makingt the case over and over that they arent real law enforcement, which erodes their authority.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Of course not. They will kick out anyone who's not white and Christian. They will try to destroy or distort anything recording their activities.

    Fucking Kluxer department should rename itself DCE.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    I see a whole lot of black and brown people in ICE in videos. If things get bad enough, they will probably be purged, I suppose, but that probably comes last. Right now racist douchebags like Stephen Miller need useful idiots to carry out the job...

  • source
  • parent