top 96 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 74 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 35 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    No. The last chance was 2024. They lost. That was the last fair election. There is no way that the fascists have come this far and gained total control only to give it up because of an election.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Voters do. Democrats don't. This is a voter issue at this point and framing it like a political party is gonna come save you is why people are apathetic.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    "a landslide defeat for President Donald Trump in November’s midterm elections is exactly what is required if the country is to start reversing his deliberate and rapid erosion of its democracy"

    that... seems unlikely to me. I mean, he's not popular, but his approval ratings aren't significantly worse than the last time he was president.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

    Polling show that Dems are unenthusiastic about voting in general lately.

    I guess the question becomes who is angrier at their default party and will now refuse to vote with them: previously-republicans or previously-democrats? The largest registration anymore is "independent", by a lot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    That means the propaganda is working.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    If I understand your comment, you are framing this as republicans looking to split the dems using propoganda. I think its much more complicated than that. It's a fact that traditional Dem voters are far past focussing solely on republicans as the root of all of our problems. Dems and republicans have 26-27% of the voter registrations each and independents are 45%. You can only eff Dem voters in the rear and ignore their problems so many times (while committing a massively unpopular genocide for donations) before Dem voters stop considering their party as representing them-- and they'll sit on the couch when they do.

    Its convenient for people to pretend its a dem vs republican fight, but its really dem vs republicans vs couch. Couch is doing really well lately. People are sick of Trump's idiocy and also sick of the DNC's incompetence, self interest, and outright treachery. There is no democracy here until we make it happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    you are framing this as republicans looking to split the dems using propoganda.

    Yes, and it's working. Splitting the vote with couch isn't as effective as winning over a vote, but still effective for an unpopular party. And when we're in a low trust society, doing nothing feels more appealing than picking a poison.

    The issue is two fold here: 1) you're mad at 2 poisons to pick at election day but 2) do not want to put the work in primaries or before primaries to make a better pick. Someone like Mamdami doesn't just appear from the ether. And it feels defeatist an outright lazy that your preferre candidate didn't make it if you did nothing to support it.

    Your lowest effort civic duty is to vote on November, and if you can't even do that I don't know why you're in this country. We tore it apart centuries ago over lack of representation and we want to throw that away? For what? Faux doomerism disguised as perfomative protest? What's really your goal here?

    It’s a fact that traditional Dem voters are far past focussing solely on republicans as the root of all of our problems.

    Yes. We can realize that we are in quicksand and focus on getting outselves out while also realizing we later need to stop dinner from burning. But one is clearly more immediate than the other. Dinner will be the least of our worries if we sink here in 2026.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)
    1. They are pretty bad. The scarier thing is how partisan the approval is. It's been something like 80% approval among republicans and that may have only very recently slipped into the 70's
    2. Yes, the last time it happened. 2018 happened (when he still had adults in the room to limit his crazier plans), the House was taken back, and he was impeached the first time over tariffs. Not convicted by Senate of course, but it at least sent a message

    If we can slip both house and senate this time, the worst case will hopefully be to obstruct all his BS for 2 more years and leave him a lame duck. If we assume Novemeber goes smoothly (it won't, but how bad it gets will depend on so many factors).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    70s from within your own party, especially Republicans, is pretty freaking bad. He wasn't impeached over tariffs in 2018.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    He wasn’t impeached over tariffs in 2018.

    well, my info was horribly wrong. I thought I might have confused one of the failed attempts at impeachment from the first term, but it wasn't that either.

    70s from within your own party, especially Republicans, is pretty freaking bad.

    Bad for these hyerpartisans times, yes. But this wasn't the norm, even as far back as 15 years ago.

    But it's part of why GOP congress is still spineless. A lot of their constituents still think Trump is doing a "good job". Or at least that's what they say out loud.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago

    It would help if they publicly said they will remove him and his criminals from the government. I don't wanna hear anything about it being a time for healing and reaching across the isle.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 3 months ago

    Lets give the DNC football to Lucy. This is for the game, folks. It's all up to Charlie Browns kick.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago

    “Democrats have one chance” …so we’re fucked.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Fully believe Trump will send ice and militias out to attack polling stations or something like this.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I also think this. But I also thought the No Kings protesters were going to be masss murdered and the world cup teams were going to end up in detention camps, so hopefully things won't be as bad as I think this time either

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 3 months ago (14 children)

    Democrats will likely win but then they'll remember who holds their purse and the billionaire Epstein-class will tighten their grip on us plebs even more.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    Only if people don't vote in primaries...

    That's the part I never understand, all these fucking accounts saying it's not worth fighting before the general, complete fucking silent during the last primary, and won't dona damn thing before the next one in two years

    If shits half as bad as you all say it is:

    Go fucking volunteer with your state party and make it better.

    Sitting online telling anyone with a D by their name is the same is the shit Republicans and Russians pay people money to do; don't do it for free.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    I’ve been voting in primaries since the year 2000. When will it start to work?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (2 children)

    It's starting to work now. DSA is winning primaries all over the place.

    It took the French hundreds of years and multiple revolutions to overcome their nobility. 25 years is not that long in the wide view of things. Especially when you want to achieve change peacefully, which we should.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Part of the problem is the DNC rigging past primaries against exactly the sort of change people want. But this time will the DNC pinky swear to run a clean and fair primary?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    This isn't nationals. There's too many races here (every House seat and 33 Senate seats) for them to fight every progressive candidate. That's why you occasionally see them give up and endorse a few progressives here and there.

    Also, most of their work is done in the primaries. They tend to just accept the D candidate once that is done and over with. That's what happened with Mamdmi. Mostly because that's honestly more important than the real election, and also because they kind of have to to keep the ruse up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    It really is mind-melting to see how liberals respond to the Clintons relative to Trump.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    What, voting for them and then ragging on them non-stop for stupid shit like ending welfare and supporting Iraq II: Nookyoular Boogaloo?

    You know he ran against Bush the I and Bob Dole, right. And she ran against the demented rapist crook.

    Seems pretty straightforward really. Unless you meant the Australian Liberals, then, probably, yeah.

    Yeah yeah, primaries, Bernie, DNC, i got ya. But look - on voting day a competent liberal is better than an incompetent rapist sycophant, n’est-ce pas?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    You know he ran against Bush the I and Bob Dole, right.

    Then worked hand-in-glove with Phil Graham and Larry Pressler to dismantle the US regulatory state, sure.

    And she ran against the demented rapist crook.

    How the Hillary Clinton campaign deliberately “elevated” Donald Trump with its “pied piper” strategy

    But look - on voting day a competent liberal is better than an incompetent rapist sycophant, n’est-ce pas?

    First show me some of the former. A congo line of Andrew Cuomos and Gavin Newsoms and Gretchen Whitmires and Bob Menendezes and Michael Flynns have not been kind to the liberal party over the last generation.

    How many Democrats spent a decade sucking up to Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg for a bucket of money, back in the Obama Era? How many worked hand-in-glove with Amazon and Boeing and Palantir, in the name of economic growth? How many sat on the board of Walmart and Goldman Sachs and Ford Motor Company, while pretending a liberal populism?

    At some point, you have to take the blinders off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Both Clintons were extremely competent and did good things.

    Yeah Clinton was freaked out by Fox News’ takeover of the Chud-Americans and Congresses full of Klansmen and yes he got seekrit blowjobs and liiiiiiiieeeed about it which affected his plans but championships are a crapshoot, you get what you get.

    Do we need to scrape up some “what good did clinton do” to make that case? I’m sure people who weren’t alive or whelped then may need some additional context in the lefty hole here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I hate these accounts that pretend both parties are the same and strategically forget that when the republicans got power they stacked all the courts they could leading to this point.

    If Clinton had won over Trump the world would be a better place just like if Harris had won over Trump too.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    Democrats are complicit. They have no motivation for the bulk of the citizenry to win.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    establishment Dems, sure. but there are insurgent leftists winning national primaries all over the country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    My only concern is the money musk is pushing for the right. Money equals votes and always has, the dnc refuses to help anyone not establishment. I hope the money won't matter, but I think it will.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    We've seen quite a few time that Musk has ended up spoiling votes. Because he did quite a good job tanking his own rep with the DOGE BS last yeast.

    Money can't trump voters when voters are paying attention.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -12 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Many of these leftists are soc dems who just want nicer capitalism unfortunately

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    yes, It cant possibly be the DNC centrists fault, who have been in charge forever. Its dem socialists who are to blame. Why did Omar and AOC do this to all of us?

    /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 1 point 3 months ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    You a Zionist bro? What the fuck?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    You're confused. I'm about as far from a zionist as you can be, and that comment I wrote wasnt zionist. Look at my comment history and show us all the zionism you're seeing.

    edit: or yes you can just downvote your ally and run away, also fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago

    worthless fucking article

    democrats are the FUCKING PROBLEM

    citizens have to fix this

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 3 months ago (26 children)

    What exactly have the Democrats done to inspire any confidence?

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago* (15 children)

    Nothing at all, but the progressives, the Democratic socialists, and the greens and everyone else who is fighting tooth and nail in the trenches against the far right extremists and chuds are giving it their all

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (14 children)

    And the Democrats are not going to let them win. At best they'll Co opt the progressives until they're ineffective, and at worst, they'll extinguish the progressives' flames.

    I'm appalled at how people still think voting for the Dems is an option.

    Start a third party.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    That's wrong, you need to coopt the dems until they are a progressive party. Same as how MAGA turned the reps into an absolutely insane party.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    With the MAGA movement, you had massive capital backing the propaganda. And if im not mistaken, the OG Republicans didn't really fight against Trump.

    With progressives within the Democrat party structure, you're fighting on multiple fronts -- against the party itself along with anyone interested in maintaining the status quo.

    MAGA didn't go against the grain, they slid with the direction of the Overton window, albeit faster than what some were comfortable with. Going progressive is, well, the opposite of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (9 children)

    And despite all of this, you somehow belief that starting a third party is a viable option?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Yes, there's a surprising amount of Rep voters who hates billionaires as much as the rest of us do, but Dems aren't truly working for the people either.

    There's different ideologies among the parties, but both of them are anti peasants, pro elite.

    Stuff like universal healthcare, free schools and proper psych wards are incredibly supported policies among voters of both parties. "European style" social welfare with a charismatic leader would get 60% of the votes in the US

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Why do all of the posters making these "let's start a third party" suggestion have accounts less than a month old?

    (Admittably, I've only encountered 2 of you so far, but still, what are the odds?)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago*

    Coincidence, or maybe Fediverse is experiencing a growth spike?

    Coincidentally we're also both European, unable to grasp why Americans can't understand the mechanics for why people are willing to vote for Trump, Farage or the AFD.

    Their bases are fairly similar, middle aged white men whom lost a job with good benefits to internationalism. Mostly through outsourcing production of goods.

    Simultaneously they suffered a loss of status, which arguably is a good thing. As status is more even today across the sexes than ever, but it can be hard for some to cope through.

    Furthermore the political system of all three mastodons highlighted here, are designed to ignore the few. So when the few yell foul about an issue, and nothing is done. More and more will eventually turn/agree with the issue and demand it solved.

    Most other parties are to some degree in favour of a status quo, but when the status quo means the world around you is continuously getting worse - You're willing to aim for any silver linings that challenge the status quo. Even if it most likely will accelerate society downwards, just at the off chance it won't.

    In systems that let's small parties show up, you're going to see most small parties die out again within a term or three. Because they're too extreme and the commoner will have seen them exposed before they get all the power. Well in the US and UK, there's nothing to expose before you have all the power.

    Germany should be better, but the no collaboration with AFD stance completely fucked it, as even more people were mad a huge chunk of society essentially got ignored. By the time anyone were willing to talk to AFD, they were already the largest party in the country - Just like the MAGAs were.

    If the Republican party had engaged the MAGAs when they had 2% support among the population, tackled their 2 biggest concerns and generally exposed their extreme ideologies - We would never have had a relevant MAGA movement. But ignoring the issues, gives extremism a chance to grow out of control.

    Extremism doesn't show up out of nowhere, often they have a few good points for anyone willing to listen.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Maybe. A new, third party will at least not have the baggage from years of broken promises and empty lip service. Progressives have tried to work with the Dems since 2008 to no avail, so why still insist that this time will be any different?

    Dems know the pickle Americans are in and have acted knowing that many will always give them their votes. Because what -- will you vote R? No? Then shut up and accept whatever shit we give you.

    Non voters are berated for not exercising their democratic right, but can you blame someone who's lost hope of American politics? Obama's campaign was such a breath of fresh air, the victory from which gave Dems power to enact some real change. All they did was to bail out banks and fuel the dumpster fire that was Trump's election 2016. And during that election cycle, they forced a very unpopular candidate on their voters. When COVID saved them in 2020, they still gave Americans Joe Biden and continued down the same, rotten path.

    Look at how they treated Zohran. I'm so glad he won because he shows that people want this kind of politics. If he was running for president, I think they would've tried their damnest to stop him.

    So yeah, why should someone vote for them?

    In my home country, the left party is sliding rightward, and this election I'm voting for a small party that actually stands for what I believe in. Some of my friends think I'm throwing my vote away, but my right to vote means my right to not be forced into making "mature" decisions about who I want to lead the country. That's been done for some 40 years now and has never worked. Enough is enough!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    You bring up Zohran Mamdani. You do realize he won by first running in the democratic primary, instead of running third party? That they did do their worst to stop him, and he still succeeded rather decisively? You do realize, that if Mamdani had run third party instead, New York would have a republican Mayor now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, but he was fought against by the Dems. His saving grace was Cuomo being the worst candidate you ever want running for you. And they still sided with Cuomo! Now imagine it was a presidential election and the Dems had a passable candidate. They would've done their all to stop Mamdani, and it wouldn't be far-fetched to think they'd succeed.

    The Dems are not leftists, they're not progressive. They're a right wing party that doesn't give two shits about its people. People think they're progressive because they don't mind gay people or minorities within their ranks -- for now. And they think they're somewhat on the left because American politics is so fucked that there is no representation whatsoever for leftist politics.

    Just because one person succeeded doesn't mean that more will. Zohran won because he's principled, skilled and faced a convicted rapist. So either hope for such odds every time, or start a new party with candidates that dont have an instant -100 in trustworthiness because of the D next to their names.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago

    And whatever advantage is gained by not having a D next to your name (Mamdani certainly won despite having a D next to his name) would be lost by having to compete with both the Democrats and the Republicans.

    A third party is not viable compared to coopting an existing party.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    take over the dems (long shot, been tried many many times) or start a new party. Lets try both. The republicans are a lost cause though, and we're clearly short on time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Not be nazis. The bar is tragically low

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    You may be forgetting that Biden sponsored the start of the genocide. Tens of thousand were murdered through his support. Its painful to hear and I'd love to just blame it on the republicans, but aipac utterly owns both parties and pretending that isnt so just keeps us trapped in this forever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Yeah, I'm not defending the democrats. I'm just saying the reason they have support is they're perceived as not as bad as the nazis and it's really fucking tragic that America is at that point where all a party has to do to get support is be perceived as the only viable alternative to literal nazis.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Yeah but they've consistently supported Nazis abroad and done pretty much nothing to curb fascism at home. I guess they're not technically Nazis but that's like Nazi adjacent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Preselect a few socialists? (Not much)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

    Why does anyone think there are still chances left?

    edit: to clarify, I mean there are no more chances to "halt the erosion of US democracy"--it done eroded already. We're starting over now. The only thing we don't know yet is whether the coming elections will be free and fair. If they are, we can start rebuilding with a new movement to replace the old failed parties. If not, other steps will wind up being taken, one way or another.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Honestly this reply is a solid way to put it, there's a lot that can't be said until it's time to talk about it. It does come down to November and if we have elections that are fair it should be a sweep. We're seeing already in smaller red districts huge flips, so if its anything but a totally blow out something was going on. My guess is Dems stopped saying what they're going to do so a plan can't be made against it, everyone just locked in held their ground and shut up. Couple more months, america in the balance, somethings gonna happen either way. The most important midterms I've ever seen personally.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    This comm got so weird when the ml’s started camping next to the spawn points.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    I'm reading this comment section and shaking my head.

    I mean, Democrats deserve a lot of crap, and I have and will continue to give them crap, but we're in primary season. I seriously don't get the nihilism and defeatism about a primary. If you want any option in the general, now's your time to vote for who you actually want the most.

    How did NYC get Mamdani? Was it burning our vote or discouraging people from voting because the establishment Dems and billionaires wanted freaking Cuomo, and woe is us because the fix is in? No, it was taking a stand and believing that you can make it happen.

    We'll have different debates in the general since I'm sure progressives won't win every primary. But right now is the time to send Santa your wish list and stop dooming.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    We still seem to have a lot of "both sides are the same" mentality here, as if there aren't shades of evil out there.

    People who still think that after the past 19 months are either complicit with the destruction, severely uninformed (or lacking real perspective), or are letting perfect be the enemy of good. We can critisize (and we should) the DNC while also realizinig their vote is the quicket way to stop the further slide into fascism. If we can find a progressive or DSA or whatnot, even better. But not all races will have those.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    Bothsiderism will be the death of civilization. Unfortunately, the corporate media has done a lot to build this and to continue to prop it up. There is a lot of money behind the effort to get people to check out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    The LemmyLeft can’t compromise. Violent revolution where workers throw off the chains of their oppressors and remake all financial systems overnight or nothing at all.

    No they’re not russian bots whatever would give you that idea.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Yeah, I really don't understand.

    I'm pretty left from an ideological perspective - universal free healthcare, state-owned or funded basic necessities, food and safety nets, guaranteed worker protections, eliminate billionaires and restore sane worker wages through sane tax and maximum employee/ceo pay multipliers, public-funded childcare services, free or nearly-entirely state-funded tuition through at least college. That cost is a drop in the bucket compared to what we spend on war and pork barrel. And the way you get there is by taking steps toward it to eventually get there.

    If one's position is all-or-nothing or that democrats are ineffectual so they're equally bad and therefore we must oppose both, that's basically saying to move from point A to point B, we must teleport rather than walk or drive or take the train. That ensures we never get there... because that metaphorical teleportation is fiction, and no, setting the world on fire doesn't magically create incentives or conditions that in any way help discover teleportation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Yep, very well said.

    I think we can all remember being in our late teens/early 20s and expecting everything to change now, because something something "my generation" and because now I can vote, and politicians better pay attention to the young people, etc., but then most of us tend to grow out of this position.

    Unfortunately there is a certain type that definitely does zero self-reflection, has no pragmatism or awareness of how the real world works, etc. and stubbornly sticks to this myopic (and frankly, rather selfish) viewpoint, and even worse, try to encourage others to either be apathetic or throw away their votes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    If you didn't experience Boing Boing's descent in ridiculously cartoonish hyper-partisan more-leftist-than-thou purity testing and virtual struggle sessions/Oppression Olympics before they took the comments behind a paywall (! lol. rotflmao, even), it was really quite something. I'm sure that kind of thing has been repeated elsewhere, but this was quite public.

    You can still see the old comments, by the way. I would try to find some older thread that perfectly demonstrates this absurd "leftist" circle jerk/circular firing squad, but since they tended to excise anything that made them look stupid (quite easy by the way), one would have to a lot of reading between the lines about what happened after their Stalin squad got done with things.

    At least here, there is not an insane cadre of mods and prominent commenters running the place like a Mean Girls spinoff...here, I tend to block the moronic people that want to play the terminally online communist armchair theorists. I went to college; I had my fill of their utopian boring bullshit back then and don't need lectures from them on how to do leftism properly now, either.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Don't forget to vote BLUE no matter WHO! UNLESS the Blue PROMISES to make your Life BETTER then DONT VOTE AT ALL!

    -Democrat Leadership!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›