all 31 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 23 points 3 months ago

All you need to do is send them more personal data to confirm it is really you. Then they will delete it all, promise.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago

    More data collection should be opt in only from the start but at least this is something

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

    Lol. No, they can't. They can request that their data be deleted in one request. They can't actually go delete the data from all the servers and backups from all those websites and companies. They can't verify that anyone else has done that. They can't verify that even if they theoretically have it doesn't work like the systems where things are just flagged as redacted or edited out.

    For the statement they make to be true this would a thing with an overseeing body with enough power to ensure that all companies and websites store their data in the same way or with perfect knowledge and access to that data and all backups and the ability to fully wipe any data or backup data tied to a given name, email address, social security number, and whatever selection of browser and device fingerprints the user could supply and ensure that data was unrecoverable.

    I can make something way better than this. Since any folk requesting that are concerned with places keeping their data, they wouldn't even have to give their name let alone any other personal information. It would just be a very pleasing and official looking button, and when they click it there would be a reassuring popup informing them that:

    "Success! Your request for every other person, company, website, UFO, talking animal, or fantasy creature who may be spying on you in this entire universe and any potential alternate universe to immediately stop doing that and delete any information they may have collected has been sent!"

    It would be pretty much just as effective and universally (multiversally?) legally relevant as this is.

    tl;dr: Lol

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Or as we summarize in security, "how do you know?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    You replied before my edit. I really want to make that website now.

    I wonder if I should add a little footnote warning that due to relativity in this universe and the potential for variations in the speed and direction of the flow of time in any other than may exist some recipients may not receive the request before the relatively brief lifetime of humanity as a whole has ended.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    I don't think this is quite as easy as everyone thinks. They do this in Tennessee but it only works for situations that almost never apply.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    How about shipping them from gathering the data to begin with?

    Because I guarafuckingtee you that those deletion promises are exactly that: promises. They'll tag your data as "deleted" and simply continue using it anyway

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    watchout for actually enforcing this

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Here is my question.

    How does this affect LLMs. Because as I understand it, once they are trained, you cannot just, "deletr the data out."

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I'm looking for a job. I'm pretty sure it won't make a difference if I just post my CV publicly on Facebook or CraigsList at this point. Seeing how many AI rejections I have gotten, I'm sure every major tech company knows all my details by now.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    Oh yeah... There are like only a couple companies that handle the background profiling of candidates, this was true even before AI, but now they use AI as part of those systems. Once you are rated by them once, that's it. They just will reuse that profile and you will be ignored in all future postings if the profile isn't "desirable" based off their metrics.

    I highly recommend you find someone who professionally assists people create CVs and applications that understands how modern AI applications work. They will know how to refashion everything so your application looks new to the AI and will give you tips to game the AI.

    They will probably charge like $250 for the help, but it will be well worth it. If you have any colleges, especially community colleges near you, they might offer this service for free to basically anyone in state.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Or just reject working with any company that cant be assed to have a human review applications.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago* (7 children)
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    I'm pretty sure as much as possible if our data is being collected, too.

    The fact that it's not as fucked up as in the states is little protection, just look at how chat control got shoved up our bums.

    Laughing at America is a splendid cynical feel-good distraction, but let's not kid ourselves and fight for every bit of privacy they are going to try their hardest to wrest away.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    GDPR already allows us to delete data with just a request, which is what the comment you're refering to references.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I and I am saying not to get complacent.

    Have you used the GDPR to remove any data?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Link to said website, anyone?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [M] 7 points 3 months ago*

    In the future, please provide an archive link or a link backing up the statment: https://cppa.ca.gov/announcements/2025/20251113.html

    Edit: Rule 7

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago
    [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    And they absolutely won't just collect it again...

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Now do the other 50 States!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Werent they few months before going for age verification on OS?

  • source
  • 18 comments in c/programmer_humor@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 141 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    How about passing a law that makes it illegal to sell any of someone's data without express written consent for each sale.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah this is just whack-a-mole.

    Multibillion dollar business idea: shitload of shell companies that keep your data constantly in circulation, undeletable. Subscription service that just re-sends your data to companies after deletion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    passing a law that makes it illegal to sell any of someone’s data

    A nice thought, but how to enforce this law? How to prove they gave or sold data? It's easy for them to hide/delete records of data transferred.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Something I never see mentioned in discussions about privacy and "deleting your data": all of these websites store information in databases, and databases are (usually) backed up on a regular schedule. This means that the databases in their entirety are written to tape or optical drive or whatever format, in a form where they could be remounted/restored in their entirety if necessary. Even if your data is "deleted" from the current active instance of a database, no company goes into all (or any) of the backed-up copies of that database to delete that same data there (and even when you delete something from the current active instance of a database, the deletions are logged in the audit tables and so are never truly "deleted").

    So it is impossible in a practical sense to truly delete your personal data, regardless of what any law says. It's not even possible to make it inaccessible to AI, since most likely when websites sell their data to AI companies, they are selling database backups that predate AI.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago

    This along with the present "child protection" efforts around the world doesnt really target the underlying fascist mess which encapsulates the digital sphere. Deletion like this is a move forward, dont take me wrong - but in a way it is a strategic diversion for fascists to more discretely sell your data.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago

    How about letting me sell my own data for my own financial gain. That way I can sell the parts of my life I want to sell

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Why is this in programmer humour?

    Why is this funny?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [M] 13 points 3 months ago

    Thread locked because it's off-topic to our community. (Although there were some interesting discussions, thanks.)

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Grant Certiorari

    Nice lawyer joke there.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Truly hilarious

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    At this point I'm seriously considering just running something like openclaw with a basic model to just keep clicking on random stuff and browsing the internet, changing personalities each day at random, to flood my IPs data.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Yeah, that's never getting deleted - it just sets a flag that 'this account is more interesting'

  • source