top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 141 points 3 months ago

You buy a new one so the c level can buy another yacht

  • source
  • [–] 82 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    My car is so old it makes its own cloud!

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 36 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    True. But actually I don't have a car. My last car decades ago, had a cassette player. But that had Auto Reverse. When it reached the end of the tape it would play the other side without you having to eject the tape and turn it over!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    F that noise. 8 track for the win!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    String quartet squeezed in the back seat or GTFO.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Look at the queen of England over here with a car quartet! We just had a couple hillbillys with banjos in the rumble seat of our jalopy AND WE WERE THANKFUL.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 70 points 3 months ago (12 children)

    In a sane world, there would be a law that forces certain types of features to always work.

    Cloud connectivity can have benefits but honestly, 95+% of a car’s feature does not need the internet

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Most cars throughout history have had zero need for the internet. I just hope it does not end up like video games, where they can sell an unfinished product and patch it later. Though there are benefits to that model, but recalls exist for a reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I just hope it does not end up like video games, where they can sell an unfinished product and patch it later.

    Too late. This is already the case, I don't know of a single EV that wasn't buggy on release and still buggy a year or two afterwards as the manufacturer hunts bugs in a leisurely pace. It already is like in the gaming industry. Don't buy an EV that isn't at least one year old on the market or you will become their free of charge beta tester...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Anacdotaly I suspect most car software bugs aren't hunted or patched at all, unless an exec at the company happens to run into the bug in their personal vehicle and flags it for the development team to fix.

    I've heard too many stories of car software issues where the dealer gives it back with a note "reset the battery and tested good" but the bug is still easily reproduced.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    We need a Stop Killing Cars movement

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    A lot of people don't realise SKG is a foothold in exactly that fight. If you establish precedent on something as "frivolous" as video games you can use it on much higher value thing too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I still don't understand why people call the biggest entrataiment industry "frivolous" especially when some stories are better than many films i saw

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 68 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    In response to some customer concerns of a dead battery resulting from the DCM continually trying to access the 3G cellular network, which is no longer available

    https://www.theautopian.com/why-subaru-batteries-are-dying-all-across-the-country/

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    WOW... we were trying to hunt down why my buddy's forestor's battery kept dying....

    We even disconnected the wire that tells the alternator to stop charging the battery...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    So you'd also get screwed if you routinely are parked somewhere without any cellular access? Nice design.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago

    Just picture it - You drive your Subaru, the off-road adventure car company, to a camp site in a remote area. You wake up after a few days of hiking and camping to return to your car.

    The battery is dead. If you camp too close to the car, the key fob being close to the car will leave it in a "standby" mode which drains the battery on top of the car pinging the server for updates.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 49 points 3 months ago

    vehicle … cloud

    Flying cars sure turned out differently than we imagined in sci-fi.

  • source
  • [–] 46 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Is this article presuming that this isn't part of the plan? Auto manufacturers think our brains work like "oh no, my connected service was end-of-lifed. Guess I gotta buy a new car."

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    People already have been brainwashed on "how many years of security updates does this smartphone model have?", and being paranoid about older-than-a-few-years devices, so you're not far off.

    (Not trying to diminish the necessity of software security updates, but at the same time I could not find any Android exploits that do not involve users installing malicious apps, supply chain attacks, or state actors)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    This is what the GPL was meant to fight against. Having boxes running software that is still under the control of the manufacturer.

    Instead people complained that it was hard to use the code at work. YES. THAT'S THE POINT.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Sure but that’s also the reason stuff like this isn’t GPL. For-profit software simply isn’t going to use the give-away-for-free license.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    You know it might make sense for automotive. The car is the product after all. The quality of the engine is ultimately what drives sales and most of the entertainment is traditionally third party. Making the on board stuff open helps them make a platform for third parties that are safe from manufacturer trying to push them out or collect fees. That environment also helps the manufacturer in its own sales as their cars are where the cultural impact is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Sharing code makes sense for everybody. It lets them spend a lot less resources on fixing shit if everyone else is also doing that somewhere upstream. With FOSS you can have your cake and eat it too. At some point Google calculated that committing one developer upstream for the Linux kernel can save a company the equivalent of a couple dozen specialist developers downstream in bug prevention and feature alignment across vendors alone.

    Unfortunately many companies continue to think about code as if it were potatoes. It doesn't fucking matter who owns the code, it's a functional spec. But hey, look at all the trouble we have explaining why standards are good – nevermind opening code.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Ohh for sure. That is also my position. I was just pointing out that people do not pick a car for the entertainment, but it can sway a purchase. An auto maker that keeps an open platform might have a stronger third party market that helps sway people into their cars, so even in their "we are trying to maximize our profits" still have a reasoning for it. Of course good luck telling senior management.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    It makes sense for everybody, except for those with a financial interest in selling and/or haggling over software licenses. That's not only the companies producing the actual software, but also legal firms and similar "specialists" who siphon off money from this system of complex IP law.

    IMO the only way to transition to more software being open sourced, is to deconstruct these vested intrests with regulation. We need to fundamentally restructure the way software development is funded, and transition away from a model where ownership is the only thing that's profitable.

    Doing that is delicate though, because as backlash from those vested interests, a lot of workers will likely lose their jobs. You need to make sure those people easily find new jobs working on open source, and communicate that effectively, so workers' job insecurity is as low as possible during the transition.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 74 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (15 children)

    I'll never buy a vehicle that requires cloud connectivity for anything. Not a problem!

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Well, most cars don't REQUIRE it, but most cars lose features if it doesn't have network connectivity.

    Good luck finding a car made after 2020 that doesn't have at least one or two features that require the Internet to function.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    I'm curious what you would pick today if you had to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    I guess I assumed we were talking new or newer cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Oh, we definitely were. If you don't want something connected to the cloud, your options are:

    • buy from a very small company
    • build yourself something, kitcar style
    • buy something from 20 years ago

    Everything else is a rolling data vacuum

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I feel the same way about the new cars which is why I'm still driving a 2012. I genuinely have no idea what I would get if I wanted something newer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    I'm rocking a 2006 VW Polo. Thing's a beast. Almost no power, endless tiny things wrong, but I got pushed off the road by a cement pump truck...and I mean...yeah it was "written off" but only because popping the dents and repainting it would be more than it's value. Most of what's gone wrong I've been able to fix myself for less than £100, and going to my friend's place to use his garage and big jack.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    I've had to pick a new car in the last year. I chose a 2012. fuck new cars. fuck their headlights. fuck their spying. fuck their complexity. fuck their non-ownership. fuck their cost. fuck their bloated sizes. fuck their blind spots. fuck their driver assistance that interferes with my control of the vehicle. fuck their touchscreens that are absolutely useless in sunlight.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    In my opinion it should be illegal to shutdown as long as they have cars. I would not buy any device that requires internet access to work with basic functionality.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Basic stuff like connecting vehicle to WiFi and apple play should be enough imo. Adding internet to a car is just an added cost

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • You can't really write laws that just require people to offer a service indefinitely though. That's how you end up locking some poor bastard in jail who honestly tried to start a good car company up, did the best they could, and then saw it all go under. No one would ever start a car company, lest they risk imprisonment if the thing went bankrupt despite their best efforts. Starting a car company is already a hugely risky endeavor. Now you're asking people to risk imprisonment if the company fails. I'm generally in favor of locking up more CEOs. But there are plenty of ones committing real crimes. We don't need to be inventing new ones to trap otherwise innocent people.

    The way to do this right is to mandate a long but still limited period of cloud coverage, say 20 years. And require companies to put up a bond to cover the cost of third-party hosting these ongoing cloud service in the event they go bankrupt. Then also require all essential functions to work without cloud connectivity.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 3 months ago

    It's crazy that "local first" has to apply to cars now.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    We must create some legalisation on this else a buch of smart cars are going to turn into dumb bricks.

    In contrary to what many are saying I don't think going back to plain cars is the solution. I think an open standard would be the solution here to provide an option to self-host or connect to provider.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Doesn't even need a technical solution. Could just be some law that in order to sell a vehicle:

    • A company has to maintain any cloud support for at least 20 years.

    • They have to put up a bond that will allow such services to continue even if they go belly up before those 20 years are through.

    • All vehicle features where cloud connections are not essential to their function must be operable without any cloud connection. So it's fine if after 20 years you can't pull the contacts from your google account to display on the car's screen, or if GPS map updates no longer work. But the door locks or seat heaters better not be cloud connected.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Enforcing 20 years of support would be difficult since they'd presumably be going bankrupt/closing anyway so they don't really have anything to lose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    The cloud? I've owned many a vehicle who's company doesn't exist anymore XD No car should be tied to any cloud or connectivity crap for use

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    Pontiac says "hello" and Oldsmobile is hitting on Saab.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    Holy shit how did this comment make me feel so old. Saturn was the only one that came to mind but I recognize all of those.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago*

    Daewoo is the one I wish was still here.

    Fun part about Pontiac, they were where most of the Saturn people came from. So those people got to watch gm kill two of their dreams.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 3 months ago (13 children)

    Slate Auto: "Cloud? Oh, you mean that completely optional telematics thingy that's intended more for business fleets! Yeah, that's excluded by default on our vehicle."

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    I preordered one. I think I might see how to use meshtastic to add remote start. Should be able to have bidirectional status and huge range.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    You have my attention... but with Meshcore and a repeater magnet mounted to the roof.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    a repeater magnet mounted to the roof.

    What's a repeater magnet?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    It's an electric truck. You don't need remote start.

    I presume you mean remote climate control.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Yes but Kleenex and Google. Its a generic term for turning your car on away from the "start" "ignition" button.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Sort of like the gas pedal in my leaf.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Wait. You don't have to press a button to turn it on? That would take a bit of getting used to

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    No, i was giving an example of something that is called by an outdated term. A Leaf is an EV, but I still call the accelerator the "gas pedal". (Its not even the gas pedal on a modern combustion engine car, its the air pedal)

    The car has a button you push to turn it on like a normal car with a pushbutton start.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    My car is a 2009. I'll be keeping it for the foreseeable future. I'm pretty handy, so as long as the engine doesn't wreck itself (interference engine), I'll just keep changing out parts, oil, fluids, etc...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    my 2008 is now a piece of shit and things keep breaking that I don't bother to fix, but I'm considering keeping it alive even though I bought a 2012 to replace it. might want to start investigating that misfiring and why it's eating oil...

    after fixing most of the issues required to get the 2012 safetied, I've come to the conclusion that I got a bit scammed and the vehicle might have been partially flooded, so who knows what else might go wrong. every task I've started on it has had a hiccup, even just replacing the license plate light bulbs - the brackets the screws for the bulb cover going into disintegrated, so I had to remove the whole trim piece to replace those. since when do things like that rust out‽

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I have yet to own a vehicle made in the 21st century.

    I'm terrified of having to get a vehicle that requires software updates that eventually will stop receiving support. I'm also terrified of getting a vehicle with just generally shitty software. My gf's car has awful software and there's nothing she can do about it.

    Just give me 90s era cars again. They last forever and they're easy to repair on your own.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    There's lot to be said for physical safety features like side and curtain airbags, or better crumple zones that don't crush your feet, but those were pretty much standard by 2012 so you can have those without all the computer nightmares.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I wonder how much cheaper a car without any crap in it could be today if they still manufactured them at scale

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    I know I may get flamed for this since it has funding from Bezos but take a look at the Slate Truck (https://www.slate.auto/). Not cellular modem so no tracking (other than app based things. They say like charging and whatnot but you never know). No carplay or android auto, not entertainment dash at all. Hell the windows are old school cranks for rolling up and down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago

    You just throw it out and buy a new one. Duh.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago

    We'll need new regulation to stop this. And, we won't get it with the capitalists in charge.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    No worries, your cloud vehicle will not survive the cloud. Its electronics are so noumerous and irrepairable that cloud cars will never reach the age of cars build in the past.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    1 comment in c/stallmanwasright@programming.dev view that post