Mr Lovenstein | Mastodon

Bonus Panel

Alt TextI hope the reboot is faithful to the original guy with a spear.

Transcript4 Panel Comic

Panel 1: Two hairy cavemen sit on rocks and talk. They have long, unkempt hair and beards, as well as uni-brows, and wear short loin clothes. One of the cavemen on the left gestures while speaking to the other who is bush drawing in the dirt with a stick.

Caveman 1: Hey, you remember that cave painting of the guy with the spear?

Panel 2: Caveman 1 listens with a smile on his face. Caveman 2 is excited to discuss this masterpiece, his stick forgotten.

Caveman 2: Of course! That painting is the best!

Panel 3: Caveman 1 drops some knowledge on Caveman 2 who grabs his hair in shock and horror at the revelation.

Caveman 1: Would you believe that was made 20 years ago?

Caveman 2: Whaaat?

Panel 4: Caveman 2 covers his face with his hands to hide his despair. Caveman 1 somberly agrees with his companion.

Caveman 2: Fuck I’m old…

Caveman 1: Same

all 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 17 points 3 months ago (7 children)

It’s this supposed to make me feel better about being old?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 months ago

    At a previous IT job, the department had been around quite a while. User accounts didn't provide a start date - at least not one that I could see - but there were ways you could estimate the general length of time the user had been with the department.

    A few times, some aspect of those ways would cause a configuration or processing issue. For a while I was the only person handling ... That department. Almost universally, after I fixed and explained the problem, the people having these difficulties would, mostly jokingly, complain about being old. I would say "you're just a legacy user!" (or similar things) It almost always made them laugh.

    So - I wouldn't call you old. You're a legacy and I appreciate your tenure!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago
    [–] 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Guy with a spear is closer in time to massive hut made of mammoth tusks than to now

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Reminds me of a school textbook we had. I don't know what the reason was, I guess they would just trying to be funny, but ot had little quotes in the margins that sounded sensible when you first read them, but fell apart if you thought about it for 3 seconds.

    One of them was: Cleopatra was closer in time to stegosaurus, then we are now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Would hunter gatherer societies count years? After maybe a year or two ago would it just be "a while ago"?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    @cannedtuna with the advancement of tech and the downfall of democracy into technofuedalism, it feels as if a million years have passed since now and 2004.People who weren't alive during 9/11 may as well be a different species to those who were. Its similar to someone from 1890 being dropped into 1960. Except its a much shorter timeframe.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    22 years were always long, especially when you are talking about the edge times just before there were massive changes.

    Take for example 1913 vs 1938 in Austria. (Ok, technically it's 25 years, but it's not much more than 22 years.)

    In this time span you had:

    • Monarchy, Austrohungarian Empire, at peace
    • WW1 starts (1914)
    • Austria loses WW1 (1918), Monarchy fails, first Austrian Republic is created.
    • First radio station goes live (1924)
    • Roaring 20s
    • The head of government makes a coup, declaring the Federal State of Austria (StΓ€ndestaat), a fascist dictatorship. (1934)
    • The Nazis take over Austria (1938)

    You can find similar periods of rapid change in every country. For the US look at e.g. the independence war or the civil war. Or the time before, during and after WW2.

    Yes, we are in a time of somewhat rapid change, but neither is that unique, nor is it especially rapid.


    And the comparison between 1890 and 1960 is entirely invalid. Much more changed in this time frame than between 2004 and 2026.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago

    some things never change πŸ˜‚

  • source